So now that the dust has settled, was he truly the best Beatle?
So now that the dust has settled, was he truly the best Beatle?
Logan Harris
Other urls found in this thread:
Nathan Hall
he does all my favorite songs he was the only one that had a real soul
Oliver Davis
interacial sexual intercourse
it needs to be brought into the light.
No more hiding it.
Bentley Anderson
Well no. He would have had more songs on albums if such was the case. Def the most generic beatle sounding beatle though. Having 10 years of material in the can is why he had the solo career he did. Paul is leagues beyond its not even up for debate.
Caleb Nguyen
>Couldn't stand Yoko and John
Really stimulates my synapses.
Aiden Clark
No way. He was good and I really like him, but to claim that he was better than John/Paul is just plain wrong.
Tyler Jenkins
Yes. His solo diacograpy is better than john, paul.
Kevin Wilson
George has fewer duds than McCartney and Lennon but thats only because they make more songs than him. But yeah, McCartney was the better Beatle though I think All Things Must Pass is the best solo Beatle album.
Isaac Hill
Musically that is debatable, he had some terrific songs and "Something" is god tier, but Lennon and McCartney are a bit better. Personality-wise, however, he is only just above Ringo and way above John and Paul.
Hunter Bailey
Well like I said he is pretty generic. Got my mind set on you is just a typical 80s tune that culd have been anyone. Georges songs could have been sung by Jeff Lynne and no one would have noticed.
Ryan Reyes
Why are you pairing Lennon and Mc Cartney? Lennon is closer to George than Paul. Paul carried the band for the later half of thier careers.
Cooper Smith
Every member of the Beatles was as crucial to their success and musical output as the next. In this regard, every Beatle was the best Beatle.
Isaac Parker
Marketing wise sure. Thats why they kept the facade of being in a band even thought they were a collection of solo artists from sgt peper onwards. If paul is playing drums, it aint the beatles. They lost thier sound. They became a studio project. George Martin was actually the best beatle. He had to take those messy idieas and turn them into songs.
Lincoln Hernandez
Faul is the best
Aiden Ortiz
>He would have had more songs on albums if such was the case
John and Paul wouldn't allow it.
Kevin Diaz
youtube.com
Best song on the album
Adrian Long
Paul >>>>>>>>>> John = George
Ringo has the best personality of them all though.
Aiden Turner
This
Jacob Sullivan
Unrelated but why do so many British and Irish people look like they could be from Spain or just in general the Mediterranean?
Bentley Richardson
That's how most of them looked like before the northern conquests
Alexander Watson
He doesn't look Med to me, unless you're counting brown hair and eyes as automatically being Med. He had pretty fair skin.
Christian Moore
I like George's moodier guitar and world stylings a lot so sure why not.
Kevin Brooks
Thats not run of the mill
Liam Sanders
because a lot of western and even some northern euros have dark brown hair/ brown eyes
Mason Richardson
Why bother with this matter when The Beatles were trash in general
Dylan Collins
This to be honest. They all were really good at what they did and it shows by how poor most of their solo albums were, with a few exceptions.
Carson Morgan
The reason George is my favorite is because his solo works are better than the others. As far as solo music goes, it's gotta be
George > Paul >>> John = Ringo
Matthew Howard
nice bait