What Anthony Fantano and Noam Chomsky have in common

Anthony Fantano got BTFO
youtube.com/watch?v=743EjjA_iO8

Attached: anthonyfantano.png (909x670, 572K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=idy8m5V8uLI
currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve
youtu.be/BgIz49hbjto
youtube.com/watch?v=a5iFwHM-WKs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Chomsky is based though. Smartest man in the world.

Also Peterson is an ignorant piece of shit who needs to shut his mouth regarding philosophy and politics because it's clear he is a reactionary asshole pushing misinformation on impressionable kids.

well while this faggot shit ...invasion? is going on, peterson is as obsessed with stupid worthless disney shit as any random tumblr shipper, who the fuck is fooled by him

the fantano/peterson overlap is way bigger than fantano/chomsky i bet (because fantano SUCKS, HE SUCKS)

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick, that made his ears burn
Whatever happened to the heroes?

Attached: Trotsky_Portrait.jpg (260x357, 19K)

I don't think he should necessarily silence himself, as that just feeds into the "muh oppression" complex. I'd like to see more academics pointing out the inherent flaws in his reasoning methods. i.e: his frequent use of unprovable and unfalsifiable claims in drawing vague conclusions that may or may not serve as dog-whistles for white supremacist/alt-right views.

>Smartest man in the world
youtube.com/watch?v=idy8m5V8uLI

every cutaway text comment is just confusing to me. They either miss Chomsky's point or are just plainly uninteresting

>Sam Harris fan
>that awful voice
hahahaha not watching this thanks

Most articulated and best debater in the world, perhaps. Many of views were proven totally wrong in the 70s and his fans think that being a smug well-spoken cunt makes him a genius though.

>me not like voice

Attached: 1509378239897.png (403x448, 53K)

Fantano has been cucked since the Fader article

Christopher Hitchens would have given him a run for his money, but Noam doesn’t usually engage in debates with people who are his ideological opponents, or of near equal intelligence. I would have loved to see it happen, as they seemingly respected one another, but it’s too late now.

Chomsky is like those conservative dudes who have made a career “BTFO” campus ideologues. The playing field is not equal… He picks / chooses people below his weight class to fight with.

I love the guy to bits, and owe a sizeable chunk of my understanding of how the world works to him, but have noticed he’s a bit cowardly at putting up a fight in the public arena.

>wahwahwah melonman was mean to my surrogate daddy
currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve

Zizek vs JBP coming soon boys

Who ya got? I vote Fantano as moderator

Zizek would easily point out Peterson's misconceptions of Marxism and it'd be over there.

what does this have to do with music?

Fantano is Sup Forums related

Music is half philosophy anyways

Zizek wrote an article attacking JBP, it sucked and was full with non-arguements. Saying this as someone who likes Zizek

It already happened
youtu.be/BgIz49hbjto

Is zizek even good at debating? I've never heard him in a 1v1 debate just heard his articles and talks.

cumtown > chapo

Hey guys I'm an intellectual I get my opinions from
>dave rubin
>sam harris
>jordan peterson
>joe rogan
>brent weinstein
>steven molyneux
>pragerU
>sargon of akkad
>steven pinker

The greatest thinkers of our time.
Chomsky? Zizek? Marx? Fuck that commie gobbledygook, why would I need that in 2018 when I got these thinkers?

Not gonna comment on Chomsky because I don't know much about him, but Fantano has no idea what he's talking about when it commes to politics. He never dives into anything actually interessting or substanceful, all he does in his """""political videos"""""" is to name meaningless Bernie talking points like "a living wage" or "free education" without ever making an actual point.

i am upset because there are likely thousands of people on this site that unironically believe this

t. 21 year old libertarian socialist

>being dogmatic about philosophers
Why do Marxists constantly do this shit?

Peterson gives off the air of authority through his way of speaking, but when you listen deeper to what he says, sometimes it's just plain bonkers. He sets up these assumptions in your mind while conveniently not fully bringing his assumptions to their conclusion, like he thinks lipstick and makeup are sexuality signals but then when called out on what that implies he'll say "Oh, I didnt say anything, I didnt imply anything ;)".

peterson's basically just a surrogate dad for losers online. he's also pretty much only notable because he didnt want to call a tranny xir. other than that he'd just be some two-bit little known academic teaching jung and complaining about disney movies

ever since that fader hit piece in particular it seems like fantano has really emphasized the drumpf posting and unconditional love of negro artists desu

Even if you're right wing, if you get your information and worldview from those people, you're doing yourself a disservice. Most of them are fucking Youtubers and podcast hosts for fuck sake.

Just because Karl Marx wrote a book 200 years ago means he's smarter than Peterson, Rogan, or Molyneux?

No it's because those people, Chomsky and Marx, fit into the world view he's trying to sell you.

joe rogan's a fucking comedian ufc commentator, he's the last person to look to as an intellectual and he'd admit that.

molyneux is a con artist youtuber who is barely above alex jones tier

chapo's take on JBP is worth a watch if you have time
youtube.com/watch?v=a5iFwHM-WKs

Look you don't have to like the guy. But you're really reaching for something to hate about him here.

Please don't tell me you're seriously implying Joe Rogan and Steven Molyneux are smarter than Marx and Chomsky.

How much Marx have you read?