>Scene supossed to be in 2017/2018
>People dress in a mix of 70s/early 00s clothes
Do people really wear crap like that in modern UK? Inb4 meme answes like: lel no, they wear burkas. I mean, the white old blood britons.
Copypasta fella is welcome
>Scene supossed to be in 2017/2018
>People dress in a mix of 70s/early 00s clothes
Do people really wear crap like that in modern UK? Inb4 meme answes like: lel no, they wear burkas. I mean, the white old blood britons.
Copypasta fella is welcome
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Me on the back right
sorry
this made me chuckle
That scene was just stupid and sloppy in general. why was it so hard to find older actors?
>the last Harry Potter movie came out 7 years ago
Someone make it stop pls
Old people? Yes. All old people everywhere dress like that.
>them britbong genes
Why would yhey find older actors? In your 30s you just look like an aged version of yiur teenage self. Older actors would make zero sense.
the real problem of the scene is that harry and ronald both have make up to make them look older
except for hermando
Wizards are shitty at muggle fashion. This explains Ron but not the two mudbloods.
Because the aging makeup was not convincing at all and it made a mess of the scene instead.
>scene supposed to be in 2017/2018
What? Are they meant to be in their mid-20s? I thought they were supposed to look like mid-late 30s with crappy age makeup.
It was five and a half years ago.
They should have given Radcliffe a receding hairline desu
But that is what he was saying?
>"No!"
Battle for Hogwarts was in 1998.
This is 19 years later.
You know the books all take place in the 90s, right? Deathly Hallows is 1998.
Ron's choice in color is complete shit, but yeah, I've seen a lot of people in their mid-to-late-20s/early 30s dress like Harry.
No, I didn't know the books took place in the 90s.
Can you fill me in on some CareBears lore, too?
Sure.
The franchise consists mainly of the Care Bears themselves, as well as the later additions the Care Bear Cousins. Both of them live in the Kingdom of Caring, which is made up of Care-a-lot (the home of the Care Bears proper) and the Forest of Feelings (home to the Care Bear Cousins). In 1989, Carole Ashkinaze (oy vey) of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution referred to them as "the whimsical, late 20th-century descendents of what we used to know as guardian angels: furry, friendly, adorable creatures whose mission is to guide small children and protect them from bogeymen. Running against a Care Bear is like, well, running against the Easter Bunny."
Accompanying them are the Star and Heart Buddies, who look out for the Bears and Cousins whenever they are on missions in caring; and the Birds, who are usually seen in the Forest of Feelings with the Care Bear Cousins and watch over them. A less recurring character is The Cloud Keeper, the portly gentleman who maintains Care-a-lot. He only appeared in some of the franchise's early publications and on the DiC-produced TV episodes.
The ten original Care Bears consisted of Bedtime Bear, Birthday Bear, Cheer Bear, Friend Bear, Funshine Bear, Good Luck Bear, Grumpy Bear, Love-a-lot Bear, Tenderheart Bear, and Wish Bear. Later on, additional bears joined them, as well as the Cousins.
i will never understand this scene, so after all hat harry learned and did he ended up like that ?
i mean the harry potter series is full of bs and contradictions for me but this scene really made me feel sad for harry
...
One might say that the way in which they dress is rather dull
I appreciate this style of arguing
Reminder they are making a new trilogy out of that stageplay
>scene supposed to be in 2017/2018 London
>there's white people
Fucking kek
Came here for >dullest franchise and i gotta say, im dissapointed.
OP here, I told him he was welcome. Maybe he is just tsundere.
who is this?
This
Elsa Jean is pretty much the complete opposite of my type but makes more diamonds than anyone who is.
I hate Harry Potter so much. Even looking at this stupid picture angers me.
...
The one for Tom Felton wasn't overly off, besides the hair obviously.
For Comparison:
>youtube.com
>Ron looks like he's ready to commit suicide after putting up with Emma Watson's BS all these years
>Hurry James Sirius Severus Albus Hagrid Draco Remus Neville Fleur Dobby Cho Cedric Dumdlydore's Goatfucker Brother Vernon Whomping Willow Dudley Aunt Marge Aragog Riddle Bane Lupin Filch Crabbe Dursley Evans Fudge Shacklebolt Potter! You might miss your train!
I really like to think it's just one person posting it, even though there are obviously a bunch of them around.
It's always an issue for what was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
...
Why do they all like they're on alimony?
>Image Related
Meanwhile Ron has to deal with the fact that while his wife is Minister for Magic, he is a failure who works in his brothers jokeshop, that his best friend gave them the money for.
I don't know why but I'm in tears laughing over this.
They didn't need them at all. They just shouldn't have reshot it without prosthetics.
...
They look pretty normally dressed. I don't get this meme.
>In 1989, Carole Ashkinaze (oy vey)
Well I mean ron had to marry emma watson which is enough to make any man want to kill himself.
You and I, we are the same.
That kid was brutally beaten up every single day of his school life. Worst parents ever.
>These are 36 year olds in England
What the fuck happened?!
Just UK things. It's a really shitty country.
Like clockwork
You. I like you.
>this guy is like 42
Life is rough in England. And nobody has dental care.
>Scene set in 2017/2018
>nobody is wearing a Make America Great Again hat
What is this nonsense?
British genes happened
Stupid canacuck
Why does platform 9 3/4 look so warm and magical in Philosphers stone and dreary and dull in this last scene?
Why couldn't JK bring it all round and have harry's son come onto the platform on his own and in the movies use Columbus's style for that scene instead of Yate's blue, unmagical gloom filters
Thats basically the entire movie series in a nutshell.
1 and 2 are comfy as fuck but 3 and beyond are just way to grounded and dull.
I personally hated the change where they could just wear normal clothes instead of their school uniforms.
>I'm retarded and can't pay attention to v what I'm watching
Your late
Why would we be wearing spacka yank hats.
It's magic, I ain't gotta explain shit.