What does Sup Forums genuinely think of Stefan Molynjew?

What does Sup Forums genuinely think of Stefan Molynjew?

He seems more like a meme than anything else at this point.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=4UjywNCbY8c
youtube.com/watch?v=l9A0IbcHxds
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

He's an idiot. He calls himself a philosopher but does not adhere to any accepted reason and resorts to stupid jokes and fallacies to "prove" his ridiculous claims. Some of the things he says are based and factual, but he backs them up with rants and pseudointellect instead of actual logic. He thinks himself way more important and intelligent than he is.

not an argument

Not an argument :^)

I like listening to his podcasts when I'm driving or playing vidya desu. I don't agree with all of his views but he's one of the biggest redpillers out there besides Alex Jones

It literally is an argument you dumbasses. OP, this is his type of logic - stupid quips that make no sense at all and make a mockery of libertarianism/the right.

Truth about series is great.

His pure philosophy stuff is great.

Everything else is hit or miss. Sometimes he's over the top with his tears in the eyes impassioned pleas. Remember, he was also a theater student.

Thanks Stephen, for making another thread about yourself. If you bother to check the catalogue, their are three threads currently. You didn't need to make ANOTHER one.

I'll send your a dollar when I get off work.

100% what you said.
Sometimes he misses the mark, injects too much opinion, or hosts straw men. However, it's a good way to get news and pass the time.

Hello John, are you acquainted with mr N.O. Tanargument?

Not an argument OP.

Gasbag

>His pure philosophy stuff is great.
No, its not. It's not philosophy. Go read Plato or Nietsche or something like thta if you want philosophy. Stefan has no respect for deductive reasoning and doesn;t introduce any solid philosophical concepts.

Gotta get my daily dose, it's like my morning coffee.

We're crashing this thread, with no arguments

...

this is now a molymemes thread

What he says is 99% of the times correct, but in the end he's unfortunately just another controlled opposition youtuber. Although he's doing his job a lot better then Shapiro or Bill Whittle and it's a lot harder to look through.
The argument: youtube.com/watch?v=4UjywNCbY8c

Only arguments and molymemes allowed past this post

OP didn't call for an argument. He asked what we thought.

He brings alot of redpills with him, i dont care about the rest

I want to see a cited source and example of these errors everyone keeps talking about.

Let's be scientific here and aim for something with evidence rather than posting empty sentences...

I like him but he takes himself too seriously and rants a lot.

Watch his "SJWs Ruin Everything" video. The caller starts with a question and Stefan basically ignores it and rants about something else, only to vaguely tie it together with what the caller said.

He's a fucking creepy fraud that is out to screw people out of their money. He and his wife have gotten into shit for their border-line cult-like practices that are almost as bad as what Scientology does to destroy people.

The only thing I don't understand is if he dies what he does purposely or if he is broken and twisted and does this naturally, without malicious intent.

YOUR HOUSE

DO YOU WANT ME SHOT?

IF SO THATS A THREAT AND AN INITIATION OF FORCE, THEREFORE I CAN ETHICALLY SHOOT YOU FIRST

Are there arguments here?

but Eire-kun, what is an argument?

Not an argument.

Is he actually a jew?

>Are there arguments here?

No, why should there be? No proposition was advanced.

pay arguments
these posts needs to be more argumentative

What does Sup Forums think of based Bill Whittle? Is he redpilled?

Nevermind, I guess this answers the question.

Well he talks about anarchy, but the end it will turn to fascism, it always does. People are too stupid to govern themselvs. And left alone they will be destroyed by outsiders

>No, its not. It's not philosophy. Go read Plato or Nietsche or something like thta if you want philosophy. Stefan has no respect for deductive reasoning and doesn;t introduce any solid philosophical concepts.
You have no idea what you are talking about. You have never watched his earlier stuff or read his books and you don't even know Nietzsche's works considering that you namedropped him in that context which makes you look really foolish.

>It literally is an argument you dumbasses.
And you don't know what an argument is. Embarassing.

>He seems more like a meme than anything else at this point.
Why? What did he do now?

youtube.com/watch?v=l9A0IbcHxds

That's all he is

not an argument

STOP

YOU'VE VIOLATED MY NON AGRESSION PACT

Old cokehead fools angsty teenage edgelords into thinking that his ramblings are authentic philosophy.

He's the modern Ayn Rand.

He has an amazing voice
He should really do ASMR videos

Not a fan, have watched a few videos but I can't stand his angle. The whole voice/intellectual/accent thing is a boring and unoriginal schtick.

Also when he brings on unprepared manchildren and then roast their "ideologies", it isn't entertaining to me but rather depressing and cringeworthy.

6/10 I welcome the niche and growing alt-right pseudo-intellectual crowd, it is a healthy and refreshing change from the hyperliberal/atheism crowd that used to be/is so prevalent on the interwebs.