Daily reminder this is a 5/10 to Scaruffi

Daily reminder this is a 5/10 to Scaruffi

Attached: F722CB19-A4D7-4DDD-B182-43F605B80142-195-000000ABC7224280.jpg (384x384, 43K)

and he is right,scaruffi is always right

Daily reminder that hating something everyone else likes is a great way to get attention.

Daily reminder Scruffy is a non musician.

Daily reminder that no one should care.

And half the songs are good, so I'm not seeing a problem here.

it's a 4/10 to me?

your point?

being a non musician reduces your point to a rich soup.

:^)

but how? it's all subjective. being a musician doesn't suddenly make your taste better.

Scraufiu

Attached: latest.jpg (627x612, 57K)

used to love this album and i still appreciate it but as time went on i realized how skippable some songs on here are

No but it makes you more qualified to discuss music, and weighs your opinion higher.

Also
>it's a 4/10 to me?
Spotted the non musician

>it makes you more qualified to discuss music, and weighs your opinion higher.

how exactly?

I don't get how Scaurffi thinKs this album is mediocre, while Blonde on Blonde, which has a bunch of boring and shitty blues songs, is a 9/10.

Scaruffi really doesn't know anything about music.

That's because Blonde on Blonde has circus music at the beginning

Of course, he's not a musician he knows nothing

Meanwhile Geidi Primes by Grimes is a 7/10
The Beatles BTFO

I can't stand Scaruffi but he's almost correct here

I'd say a 6/10

Do you know what specialization means?

yes

he's right though its the weakest album from that period of the beatles, and it used to be my favourite by them

Then why are you asking questions you already know the answer to?

Hi guys. Musician here. Revolver sucks. A few good songs, one great song, and a bunch of duds.

> Musician here
How many published works do you have?

what's with all the scaruffi based shitposting today

so let's say someone is a musician, just any kind of musician, they can play, say guitar, at a competent level.

does this suddenly give them the authority over deciding the quality of albums like Revolver that were was the result of the combined compositions and performances and production of several people?

what kind of musical ability makes someone's opinion The Beatles matter, should they have to be able to recreate what The Beatles did step by step?

You didn't answer my question.

Music is subjective, being a musician doesn't necessarily mean your opinion matters more

Educated opinions aren't better than uneducated opinions?

>Music is subjective
Scruffy implies the opposite of this

its possible to have an educated opinion on music without being a musician

>Educated opinions
What?
There is no better opinion, are you dumb?

I don't see the relevance of your question.

>Scruffy implies the opposite of this

no, he doesn't, and never has. read the introduction to his rock history, he spells out very clearly that he knows his reviews are subjective.

Didn’t know you have to be a musician to tell if something sounds good.

I'm not a fan of it either. I too don't see the appeal. It's probably because I didn't listen to Beatles albums as a kid.

I made a conversational Christgay thread last week. Since then there have been lots of buttmad critic h8 threads. lol

You don't have to be a published or signed musician to be a musician you massive faggoti

Then you just sound like a poser.

But their opinion would be trumped by an actual musician
It is when it's educated.
I don't see the relevance of your question.
>he spells out very clearly that he knows his reviews are subjective.
Prove it.
Read the thread, already addressed this.

>implying Scaruffi cares about attention
he's the most patrician human alive, like it or not.

>he's the most patrician human alive
But he doesn't know music theory

Scaruffi exists so that people can post
>not a musician
and feel smug about it.

Daily reminder that all shitty music is also made by musicians

meta

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 27K)

There is no shitty music. Just shitty listeners.