Who was in the wrong here?

Who was in the wrong here?

Attached: thinking.png (1393x531, 868K)

Jack "White"

yeah it wasn't getting above a 5 from p4k

fantano has shit taste but pitchfork has an agenda
fantano is always right when the two disagree

>Jack WHITE
>Gets 9/10 from Alt-Right Fantano and 4./10 from Leftist Pitchfork

Makes you think

>Alt-Right Fantano
sucks that Sup Forums, the group that shilled fantano and got him to where he is today, is turning his back on him and calling him alt-right when he's very obviously not

Both were wrong.
The album is a 7.5

He is a white male

so are you

what does Sup Forums think?

spbp

Both. The album is a solid 3/10. Literal trash that is on the levels of Arcade Fire's "Everything Now" in terms of middle aged white guys wearing womens' hats.

based

P4K hates white musicians.
They're on a crusade to only promote musicians of color or LGBT musicians.

Fantano just has bad opinions, but at least he doesn't have an ajenda.

Fantano isn’t alt right but his politics are shit. They’re better than most centrist liberals though. I’ve never heard him talk about Le Russia xD

Did you just assume my existance?

It was a joke you idiot. Because the Fader article called him alt-right because of his meme channel

He does have an agenda - he often counterscores to what the consensus is a lot of the times to make him stand out more. Fantano really tries his hardest to be tastemaker first, critic second.

>rating any kind of music on a scale of 1 to 10

I stopped watching hill while ago, so I'll take your word for it.
But even then, I'd take a wannabe tastemaker over a website with a political ajenda any day.

He also acknowledged that Obama made race relations worse and that Clinton was a garbage candidate. I strongly disagree with him on a lot of things but at least he isn't ultra obnoxious.

>politics

thanks

>Who was in the wrong here?
You for giving a fuck about Fartano

except it's not a joke because he was so heavily affected by the fader article that he was forced to sue for defamation

It's politics within the realms of music. That's like saying we can only talk about punk rock on Sup Forums.

wtf does 9 even mean if it's only decent

It's meant to be read as "Decent 9" not "9 - Decent".

How about you stupid faggots listen to the album instead of memeing? 99% of Sup Forums posters don't even listen to the fucking music just parrot others' opinions, it's like an election

You mean
>Rating on a vague scale without a context or criteria to base the scale on
There's a valid way to scale things but saying "album is a 9" is the same as saying "this lemon weighs 5.2". There needs to be context.

>give the same score as everyone and argument your opinion
>d-drone
>give a different score and argument your opinion
>c-contrarian
With Sup Forums you can never win.

not at all
now please fuck off back to your containment board

this

let me remind you they gave SATURATION a 6.5
the best album by a group of gay black guys with a few white guys

It sounds like a joke because it's ironic that an anti trump married to a black feminist woman has been called a racist alt right by some lefty magazine just because posting dumb memes that weren't even that edgy

Well what do you think?

Attached: 1522185633110.jpg (1500x843, 191K)

Fantano is right here, there's absolutely nothing to argue S80, GK, TP and hell UU is better than DAMN

he is correct in this case
damn really was nothing special at all, but it was solid

That's a bold statement

Damn is not bad hell I like it but I prefer to listen to any other project that Kendrick put out that is not the Black Panther soundtrack

kendrick is garbage anyway