What did she mean by this?

What did she mean by this?

What are you even trying to start here?

Shit bait thread

Link to tweet?

someone post it

Is that how they charge their magic crystals?

>yfw Newt probably touched himself in front of the entire Hufflepuff dorm
>yfw someone probably snuck polyjuice potion into his pumpkin juice to turn him into a girl
>yfw they all watched fem Newt play with her clit and spread her virgin pink pussy lips

Is that a light blue colored watermark of college humor?

waiting for the potter pasta guy to make me smile

Eh??????
why is she talking about children masturbating in a group on twitter? Imagine if a male author wrote that, what the fuck would you think

gringich?

It's not a real tweet.

My favorite part is the "No". Why is he even putting that in quotation marks?

Why is this bitch constantly trying to make things up when it comes to Harry Potter. Does she really want brownie points with liberals this bad

This board is full of bitter virgins

Alright then, let’s get down to business. In regards to the OP, wouldn’t you kill children randomly in plain sight too if you were forced to watch, let alone star in, an adaption of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

At least she wasn't posting on of the dullest boards in the history of image boards. Each thread following OP and replying anons from Sup Forums as they post assorted memes has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy subtext, the threads’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of images, all to make magic unmagical, to make activity seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Moot sold Sup Forums to Hiro; he made sure the board would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for Hiro's passes. Sup Forums might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least there's some good discussion
"No!"

The writing is dreadful; the threads are terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time an user posted, the author wrote some meme "big guy, for you"

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time a meme was repeated.I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. user's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that they have no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Sup Forums by the same Moot. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids continue to shitpost, only memes will be left" And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you post on "Sup Forums" you are, in fact, memeing.

imagine if it were though

Although sad there's nothing more pathetic than liking one of dullest shitposts in the history of Sup Forums shitposts. Each shitpost following /lit/ NEETs and their pals from /r9k/ as they fight assorted kinographers has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the lack of film analysis the shitpost's only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of images and pasta to make fantasy unfantastical, to make witchcraft seem plebeian.

Perhaps the die was cast when Quentin vetoed the idea of shitposting on /lit/. Posting the pasta on Sup Forums, he made sure it would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for his (You)s. The shitpost might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly anti-intellectual in its refusal of critique and watching for the plot. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the shitposts are f-funny though
"No!"

The writing is dreadful; the main text is terrible and the troll jpg isn't much better. As I read, I noticed that every time he shitposts, Quentin writes that "Atlas Shrugged is a God-tier form of art."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that shitpost was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several hundred thousand times. I was incredulous. The shitposter's mind is so governed by spamming and repetition that he has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of the shitpost by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of: "If these kids are shitposting at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you shitpost you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>high tier
>Sup Forums
>Sup Forums
>Sup Forums
>god tier
>/sci/
>/lit/
Hello tumblr, are you enjoying your stay here? You have to go back now, you Filthy nigger

Who? I'm just someone who enjoys Newt's freckly pink cunny.

Are you so far up your ass you don't realize the fucking image is bait?

this is that fake news you hear about