Prove to me that the holocaust never happened

...

Other urls found in this thread:

jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/major_camps.html
fpp.co.uk/
encyclopediadramatica.se/MadThad0890
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Burden of proof rests on a person making a claim.

Thus, prove that it did happen.

RARE
F
L
A
G

Your argument is valid, but what I want is cold hard proof that it DID NOT happen

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
How in the hell are you going to claim homicidal killings of six million people and yet not one shred of forensic evidence?
Where are the bodies?
Explain the missing millions of pounds of bones and teeth.
The lies of the holohoax have unraveled and most sane people can see what a laughable farce it really is.

>what I want is cold hard proof that BIG FOOT/UFOS/EASTER BUNNY DID NOT happen
see how silly you sound?

This is a really ineffective way of arguing in classic debate. If evidence is not brought forward, there is no real argument; it's simply a negation.

Let's not even get into problems with defining the holocaust, the validity of evidence, or the ability to find proof concerning a historical event long past.

It happened. Get over it you fucking disgraceful losers. Thread reported.

>Prove to me that the holocaust never happened.
It did happen, we had holocaust of European lives.

I hope none of you are Christians.

I'm a Jew. Please disregard my arguments.

Point taken, but still, I need to redpill my GF, gimme something to work with

>redpill my GF, gimme something to work with
pro tip: never reveal your power level, summer friend. your girlfriend's reactors will meltdown.

I've never seen that picture until neo-nazis started using it as "proof" that the Holocaust is fake

anecdote = evidence.
Whether random leaf has seen a picture or not isn't criteria for determining validity.

suggestion: instead of trying to redpill your girlfriend on the jews, you should marry her, instead. Get her pregnant and raise a family. Build a career or launch a business and work hard so it's successful. Having lots of white babies is the only way to effectively combat the jew.

Fine. Here is what you'll find, as impartially as I can.

There were definitely race based laws and isolation in Nazi Germany; you can find not only the Nuremberg laws in German legal documents, but you also have reports of the laws in other non-affiliated countries, circa 1935.

There were definitely isolation/concentration/internment camps produced during the war; most nations at the time did have them in some form. The major reasons were those seen in the Boer War/WW1 on the Turkish front; there was a potential for "problem groups" to rejoin and fight as partisans, so the government intervened swiftly to make them more manageable. You can see the difference in partisan operations in nations that did have internment camps versus those that didn't.

The camps themselves did eventually get used for labor purposes in Nazi Germany; there are German reports of prisoners being moved for factory and labor work in the later stages of the war. It appears that early camps were mostly political and later camps became more based on tactical paranoia.

>Death camps
This is a bit of a difficult one to prove. Germany did not ever admit in its own documents that the camps were produced as extermination camps; infact, there is a lot of weirdness surrounding this. For instance, there were Jews living under Nuremberg laws in places that were considered of little tactical concern at the very end of the war. Then you add in the massive amounts of difficulty in managing such an operation, and the conflicting interests of those who liberated the camps, and you get a blurry picture.

>Nuremberg Trials
What you'll find at the trials is that most of the essential actors that would know the finer details of the operations were dead or missing. You'll also have to pay attention that claims between Nazis, and officials were wildly different, and the charges brought between the Soviets and Western Allies were difficult to reconcile in terms of numbers or intent.

You have to do it gradually. Start with fabrications that were proven, then move inward.

The math itself is impossible. Lets use the "lowest" number, the 6 million and not the now reported 11 million.

6 million divided by the 5 years of the war, not considering the camps were built one by one later in the war- 1,200,000 dead annually.
That means 100,000 died each month, roughly 3,333 died each day AND were cremated.

jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/major_camps.html

Now according to the Jews themselves there were only 7 extermination camps- that means each camp had to kill and cremate 476 Jews daily. An impossibility even with our current technology.

Thank you, kind sirs! Any more info is more than welcome

>baseless assertion
>ad hominem
>threat of violence

>muh wall of vague assumptions and random babbling.
Next time, bring facts to the argument. You haven't done your homework, clearly.
PRO TIP: start your research by reading David Irving (or watching him on youtube if you're a lazy millennial who can't be bothered to pick up a book)
related site: fpp.co.uk/

Black is jews in 1925. Half of Ukraine under occupation was jewish. No joos after ww2. Had to go somewhere.

Wow. I thought holocaust denial was just half-baked Nazi wannabes trying to rewrite history. You Rhode scholars have convinced me, though, that it was a massive conspiracy that millions of people who were actually there were all in on.

Excellent work, boys. You've cracked the case. Let me know when you disproved the moon landing.

isn't there a possibility that some where shot and dumped into mass grave?

>there were only 7 extermination camps- that means each camp had to kill and cremate 476 Jews daily.
No, just stop. That's not how experts conduct an investigation. All you're doing is making Holocaust revisionists look dumb.
Helpful Hint: Watch One Third of the Holocaust. It's on Youtube. It specifically deals with the transit camp (alleged death camp) Treblinka, where it's claimed that enough jews to fill nine football arenas were exterminated in homicidal gas chambers and their remains cremated in mass pits. Unlike Auschwitz, where it's claimed Zyklon Blue was used, the gas at Treblinka was alleged to have come from a diesel engine meant for a submarine. There are lots of problems with the facts not matching the narrative, so I encourage anyone who wants to investigate the Holocaust to start with Treblinka.
SPOILER: using GPR (ground penetrating radar), the Treblinka site was scanned by a young female researcher from the UK backed by jew grant money. She found some animal bones and a tile with a star of david that she claimed was proof of the holohoax. It was later learned that the star of david was really just a maker's mark put on the tile by the manufacturer, not a star of david.

There were some yes. The chose to report cremation, I believe, because they don't have to account for the bodies them. Think about it, why cremate when you could just bury mass graves? That adds an extra unnecessary step.

...

it's the height of the war, why would you exterminate the slave labor work force running your factories and plants?

He asked for a simple way, so I gave it to him.

The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence and vice versa

>I believe
that your way of saying you have zero evidence to support your claim?
>Think about it, why cremate when you could just bury mass graves?
So then where are these mass graves? Let's examine the forensic evidence. DNA technology could settle this argument. Oh wait, that's right, there isn't any evidence because there aren't any mass graves.

This. It would be much more productive to use that energy than to simply destroy it, heck to destroy it would consume massive amounts of resources. Resources that u can use to make bombs and stuff.

It probably happened
but not "muh 6 gorrilion"
max 100.000 jews

so now we're just making shit up and grasping numbers out of thin air?
>probably happened
The Loch Ness monster probably happened, too, but I still want to see forensic evidence before I make any conclusions.

Because you ran out of food to feed them. I don't doubt that they were locked up and starved. I do however have my doubts about any gas chambers, or ovens.

Burden of proof as you described it is a logical fallacy, so you need to prove it didn't. Burden lies on the accused, not the accuser.

>life info coming from a tripfag
Are you that same Thaddeus from Sup Forums that got convicted of possessing child porn a few years back?

No, I mean I wasn't there when they decided on reporting cremation as reason there aren't 6, or rather not 11 million corpses to be accounted for.

You understand I am agreeing with you, yes?

Zero evidence of any gas chambers has ever been found. Don't take my word for it, however. Look to the experts.

>Sup Forums
>the holocaust never happened, but it should have

never change Sup Forums

>Iceberg
Kek

No, I'm not.

If there were mass graves, that would be proof.
If there were cremations in ovens, the bone fragments and teeth would be proof.
In the last 70 years, zero evidence has been discovered to support either claim of mass graves or mass cremations. There simply are not six million jews buried or scattered as alleged by the narrative.

Are you sure?

encyclopediadramatica.se/MadThad0890

Trying to pull one over on us, Thad?

Why did the nazis destroy so many buildings (including identified gas chambers) in places like Auschwitz (where large stores of hair, shoes, etc have been found) if they had nothing to hide there?