Why don't they teach these life-essential subjects in Hogwarts?

Why don't they teach these life-essential subjects in Hogwarts?

>Algebra
>Geometry
>Trigonometry
>Calculus
>Statistics
>Physics
>Critical Thinking
>Business administration
>Sexual Education

Other urls found in this thread:

harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Hogwarts_subjects
fanfiction.net/s/10070079/1/The-Arithmancer
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because they can solve literally any problem by throwing magic at it

How do you know they dont?

This.

Most people rarely use any of those subjects in their everyday life and work.

because realistic subjects like that clearly don't belong in the dullest franchise etc. etc. i dont have the fucking pasta

t. dumbass that didn't study STEAM

harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Hogwarts_subjects

>learning Physics
>when you can literally let shit float, explode, create out of thin air, breaking the law of physics

What did they mean by this?

>Hogwarts

Go ask tumblr, faggot.

that's the guy from the clash or something fun fact

Because it was written by a woman

Arithmancy is magical math or something.

This is legit the canon reason. The wizards are hilariously handicapped because they wield magic to fix their issues instead of getting shit done.

I'm recommending you a fic and no it's not HPMOR

fanfiction.net/s/10070079/1/The-Arithmancer

>life-essential subjects
>Critical Thinking
>Business administration
>Sexual Education

hilarious

>A
Fetch me some fries, you """artist"""

>Algebra
>Geometry
>Trigonometry
>Calculus
>Statistics
>Physics

Those are all related in some way, and magic pretty much defies the laws of physics thereby making the rest equally shaky.

>Sexual Education

Naturally, there would be spells to cure any stds and some spell version of the morning after. Feticus Abortus... **poof**.

Apparently magic interferes with electromagnetic fields and that's the reason wizards don't use computers and other technology.

>No pasta

>arts

Literally shit on a canvas.

Because Rowling never gave a shit about depth of believability beneath the immediate surface. This is just one of many examples of lazy writing in one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

I bet it's the midichlorians.

>life-essential subjects

i know most of those subjects and i still have less of a life than a lot of people who don't know shit about them.