IS THIS AIDS SKRILLEX

New aids skrillex video? He's saying something and getting yelled at by a black dude...

youtu.be/fxLT0Gc_4Ms?t=2743

why are they speaking so fast. i see the timer, but y tho

wtf

Why are they speaking so fast? wtf is this?

Are you talking about the guy who moves into the camera and sits down at 3:30?

Don't give us a 2 hour video with a timestamp, retard.

boy don't know about moving away from the mic to breathe in

That's how school debates work.

Each team is on a timer, and since the judges generally reward points based upon how many arguments each team makes, teams have to shotgun as many points as possible in order to have a competitive edge.

>quantity over quality
wow that's fucking dumb

quantity + feelings > quality + facts
get with the times man, it's 2016.

No. Nothing like him. This guy is normal weight to a bit overweight. AIDS Skrillex literally looks like a dying aids patient.

That's just Policy debate. Spreading's not as common in Lincoln Douglas, and rare in Public Forum because it also awards Speaker Points

but.. i don't want the world to be like this

I can't even understand what they're saying, this doesn't make any sense

Policy can basically only be judged by people who've done it. It's stupid fast and filled with technical jargon that's completely useless outside of that one form of debate.

I can't understand them, they all sound like they are having strokes.

It's the way these debates work. Apparently they're judged on how many points they can spew out in the allotted time or some shit, so they develop techniques to speak as quickly as possible, making them sound like retards.

I remember there was some champion black debate team who did the exact same thing and garnered wide criticism from a lot of old white men for those "damn black youths" destroying the integrity of debating.

too bad you suck at debating and can't even make 2 arguments per minute. I did 17 apm in debate in grade 9 but was later hospitalized

Nah, if they're black they probably ran a critique instead of spreading. It's where you call the format of debate itself racist and tell the judge that they're racist if they vote for the other team. It's a very successful style.

I'll stick to my Oxford Union and parliamentary style debates

I like those well enough, but they don't have enough interaction between the debaters for me. Personally think Public Forum is the best option.

They do this in this round

The black dude stands up after AIDS skrillex talks and asks about if his speech kills black people

That's only high school lol

Not surprised. Basically everyone except cishet white male teams have at least one critique in their back pocket.

I know, but I'm hoping it spreads to the college circuit.

But what's the point of debating if no one can understand what you're saying?

they get points for using a gish gallop?

The judge and the other team understand

That is, in fact, the entirety of the format on both sides.

WHat ever happened to point counterpoint and facts?

Other forms of debate.

Policy's problem is that it doesn't require debaters to prove their links even a little bit, so you can just shove as many arguments in as you like, and your opponent has to deal with all of them.

UH YOUR ARGUMENT STANDS NO TECHNICAL UH GROUND UH ON THE BASIS OF OUR UH INTELLECTUAL SOCIAL UH PRIOR OF KNOWLEDGE THEREFORE YOUR PRACTICE OF INVALIDATING MY CLAIMS RENDERED MOOT DUE TO UH THE PROCESS OF RESPECTING THE RULES UH OF THE OFFENDING TEAM IN UH THIS UH ACADEMIC DEBATE FULL OF UH PERSONAL EXPERIENCE UH THAT YOU CAN NOT EMBODY UH.

that explains why people these days have shit arguments

kek
you're right i can't compete. i guess the only solution is death

This type of "debating" is a prime example of a byproduct born and bread in academia, and could never leave it without looking like a laughingstock.

Any normal person on the street would think these people to be insane.

>be myself in high school history class
>Doing debates on topics like is Marxism a good government system
>Debate all up in this shit, scoring points and swatting counterpoints left and right.
>Judges unanimously agree my team wins 3 of 4 debates, still win majority in the last one
>My team didn't even contribute shit.
>Grow into sarcastic and witty asshole
It's like poem writing

It's more that it's the result of turning arguments into a game. This is literally just a hobby, and naturally you eventually see people shed anything from it that doesn't directly translate into wins.

thats not aid skrillex
aid skrillex face is a bit fatter
thats some other white guy

all rook sane

ITT: people who have never heard of policy debate

Americans confirmed as unironically retarded.

Also OP, implying anyone is going to watch two hours of this vid. I skipped a few minutes into the vid to see some sperg huffing and puffing for 10 seconds, and that was enough for me. Absolute sage.