This was so much fucking better than La La Land

This was so much fucking better than La La Land.

Why couldn't they get a Christian to play Garfield's role?

Why wasn't it nominated for Best picture?

except it wasn't.

It was good and La La Land was bad. You fucking spook.

No

literally no one talks about this movie. in fact this is the first thread i've ever seen on Sup Forums about it. nuff said

I saw a thread today

It was too long and too slow. They could've compressed some parts. I was thinking Scorsese was old and slow so they had match the movie to him.

On a forum that the majority of posters are retarded and less than 20 years old. Real representative of the general audience, fucktard.

you just called yourself retarded and less than 20 years old. gratz

No they didn't?

Silence is 10x better than La La Land.

I am over 30 and a fucking genius. Try again, fucktard.

That's Hollywood for you. (((Oy Vey! We can't have a gentile playing the role now, can we?)))

>Silence
>trailer is filled with ear grating strings

loved this movie. the acting and cinematography were superb.

I really dont care much for the new scorsese stuff, but he was fucking robbed at this turn

It's weird that people found this movie long, I was 2 hours in before I even checked how far through I was. I guess this is just the ADHD generation, though.

Then again, in Hacksaw ridge, I checked the time every half an hour, because it was just such a pile of fucking cliche garbage.

Yes, it was.

Much better indeed, as are most of the other nominees

Most of the movies are better than La La Land.