since the >we, the toothpaste and Unitedstatians are not going to the WC i would like to see the pic related of National Teams being less than a year away
Since the >we...
also, i'm phoneposting so someone else is going to have the honor to show their paint skills
...
>korea that far left
was this made by a japanese person
Man United are boring as shit, they shouldn't be anywhere near that high up. Should probably be swapped with Liverpool.
>Arsenal
>Badguys
>korea
>good guys
kek
A lot of people don't like South Korea for the favouritism they recieved from FIFA in the 2002 WC.
>tfw Sunderland
>man united
>good play
when was this even made 2007?
someone re
Switzerland are nowhere near that good
i was part of the thread, it's from sept 22nd
JUST
>Arsenal not in bottom right corner
>Belgium
>good
also do you guys see Germany just as the bad guy or are you happy everytime they appear, because you know that something exciting is going to happen?
PAOK should be above Panathinaikos, also they're more evil than olympiakos
>denmark
>good guys
We got several niggers on our team.
>Gremio "unknown" fc is better than ajax or liverpool
kek
What makes them bad?
>inb4 some Sup Forums shit
I wouldn't have said anything Sup Forums related until you brought it up.
>mountain Jews
>good
Why are West Ham bad? Don't they have a reputation/background of drunk hooliganism and racist stuff? That's pretty much /ourguy/ stuff
whoa, wait a second
>japan
>peru
>colombia
>us
what did these teams do to deserve their spot on the x-axis?
>cheaters are good guys
>Germany bad
>Brazil good
Are you fucking serious? Lol
>NOB
you got it all wrong, >we are the good guys
>mexico
>good guys
>great play
same with portugal; also, what did >we do to be the worst on the left?
Nigga we play like shit
i feel like most people misunderstand the good play axis for just "overall better team", these two can sometimes be the same, but not always
>Colombia
>Argentina
>Germany
made by a brazilian
>no RBL
>Vasco in the left
What did we do, desu?
Eurico desu
The only meaningful way to rank a european club.
>better sugar daddy
>more money
>more transfers
>more cups
>better teams
no, nononono.. that might be how football works and is being percepted today but that doesn't justifiy the ture ranking among clubs.
Back to temple bar.
thats how yuro leagues work tho. you buy championships and spend your way to the top.
yep but still there was some quality back in time when football didn't yet go full industrial
>Estudiantes
>bad guys
>FC Porto
>bad guys
Awful mistake desu
Also:
>NO sporting
Kek
>we won more international trophies than United
Who would have thought!?
>ireland that high up
Thank you Sweden
>iceland
>good guys
you can all go kys yourselves
how could possibly a meme island that goes to the WC for the 1st time in his history be the bad guys?
there is absolutely no reason why iceland shouldnt be at the very edge of the good guy.
and why is greece the bad guy? they are like harmless at best..
England are the best guys
Cringe
They are bad because they act like they are a big club when they have never won anything relevant at all
It should probably be ranked by number of European Cups, with lesser trophies used as a tie breaker.
>Inter and Milan
>Bad guys
>Jewve
>Good guys
Literally the worst chart I've ever laid eyes upon.
>muh cringe xd
cringe
fixed
>puts teams that have no CL trophies
>doesn't put teams that do
Shit list.
bump?
I can live with that
>Atletico nacional
>Good guy
Paisa pls go