Why is no one talking about Hillary selling uranium to Russia?

Why is no one talking about Hillary selling uranium to Russia?

Other urls found in this thread:

breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/13/devastating-timeline-reveals-the-transfer-of-half-of-u-s-uranium-output-to-russia-as-hillary-clintons-foundation-bags-145-million/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Source?

breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/13/devastating-timeline-reveals-the-transfer-of-half-of-u-s-uranium-output-to-russia-as-hillary-clintons-foundation-bags-145-million/

What a bitch, bagged over 100 million. Why doesn't mainstream media report on this?

my friend claims breitbart is to the right as salon and other sites are to the left

What does Sup Forums think of this statement?

Dont Ruskies have shitloads of thier own Uranium?

Yes, but it's in Russia and Russia is shit

Ask him for evidence m8.

They dont support pedophilia. They do lean right pretty hard but they tell you stuff that other sets of media wont.

It's old news already and because shills slide these threads by dumping anti-nationalist threads/posts, derailing these threads in the process.

Because mainstream media wants Clinton to become the POTUS.

>Ireland

Unfortunately she will become the POTUS unless some miracle takes place and she suddenly dies of some heart disease or massive stroke. She is the Status Quo/Establishment candidate so...

She's right

doesn't mean what it says is false

I DONT CAR E IF HILLARY IS A CORRUPT TO THE CORE PSYCHOPATHIC LIZARD THT DESTABILIZED THE MIDDLE EAST AND IS FUNDED BY SAUDI ARABIA AND HAS POTENTIALLY HAD A HAND IN ARMING ISIS AND ASSASSINATING PPL WHO KNEW TOO MUCH IN THE 90S. U SHUD STILL VOTE FOR HER BCOZ TRUMP IS A RACIST LOL PEEEEEAAAACE

But they can make millions if they expose her.

According to factcheck Clinton didn't have veto power to stop the uranium deal.
Stupid red neck right wingers

>chad

BECAUSE THE MEDIA IS OWNED BY THE SAME PEOPLE TRYING TO MAKE HER PRESIDENT

Breitbart is very biased to the right this is true.
However, it is much more objective than Salon.
Breitbart cherry picks facts and presents them in a sensational way to support their cause, but don't outright lie or treat writer's opinion as fact like Salon does.

More important, Breitbart's subject matter is just more serious. Salon is a common interest rag that occasionally makes ill-guided remarks on politics.

>banishment to death
jesus christ saudi arabia

But Gayness is against Islam.