Sup Forums is nothing without it's spooks. Face it, you have turned yourselves into nothing but dolls to be possessed by that which is outside yourself. You'd give yourselves up to traditions, to nations, to races, to masculine appeals, to spoopy religions, when you could be greater than all those things combined.
Give up your spooks Sup Forums and embrace what you in your totality desires. Or don't. I'll still need madmen to entertain me after all.
I wish based Stirner was still here
...
Me too
stirner is trash tier childish "philosophy" for people who don't want to think.
>says the country who's only philosophical claims to fame is edgy atheist Hobbes and "muh tradition" burke
>I never read Stirner
People on Sup Forums have no personality though.
Drop your hot egoist memes lads
they would certainly have to think outside of the box
>It's another autistic /leftypol/ episode
Wew lad
SAGE
>I have nothing to argue and I must post
/r/ing stirner edit
*GLUG* *SLURP*
MOOT!
O
O
T
!
I'm spooked
no u
here you go senpai
Thanks my property
Soo.
You are trying to say. I can be greater as an individual ,then race ,nation ,religion combined? And what greatness are you talking about? The greatness of being half eyed in the world of blinds? The eternal struggle against everything? Jerking of my own intellect? No. Only the masses have strength to form and accomplish. The mass may borrow ideas from the great thinkers ,but in the end it only serves the masses. And what follow those masses. Ideas ,traditions then culture and religion they made. I can't stand against this flow ,but why should I? If this great unity ,gives the opportunity to achive great things not as a person. But as a greater unity.
race, nation and religion are all just ideas, as is mankind. And it's easy to be greater than an idea, you can simply ignore it.
Groups of people who call themselves a race, a religion or a nation may have power, but simply because they have power that is no reason to subvert yourself to them either.
When you allow any of those ideas to dominate your being, you are doing yourself a disservice as there is more to you in your totality than that idea.
can someone summarize what this guy is about?
just seemed like kooky bullshit that boiled down to solipsism
True story: There was a white gang in Los Angeles in the 40s and 50s called the Spook Chasers.
But they didn't get that name from bustin' ghostseses.
Stirner acknowledges that things exist outside himself, he merely asserts that nothing outside of himself is greater than him unless it can actually impose its will on him.
He critiques fixed ideas such as nations and race for being imaginary, and the fact that people give themselves up to such things as being madness, spooks or spirits which posses the living.
He asserts that freedom is but the freedom to do what one pleases in their totality, and he would probably tear down all law and statehood which asserts ownership over him, for he saw the hold world as his property, and that he only needed to gain control over it.
What a story mark
equality is a spook.
So? What does it matter? Your attributes of stature are meaningless to me.
I think nobody on Sup Forums understands or even knows this meme. Great memes though OP, go back to /lit/.
The creative nothing does as he pleases, user
You're a spook.
No u
those are pretty bad memes
How can you state that I'm spooked if you're my property?
Aren't they both lolbertariens?
you're a pretty bad meme, user
lmao
because I am the unique one
I fucking love this meme
stirner memes so cute :3
Here, have a stirner catgirl
Why don't leftists ever concentrate on WHY people won't "just do simple thing X that would lead to complete revolution"? They just sit there insisting that if the masses just do something, or just realize something, then everyone will spontaneously transform into something entirely different than what they are. It never seems to occur to them that the state people are in is actually the most stable equilibrium state they were likely to achieve. I guess it's not just leftists that do this. All utopians do it. Utopianism is cancer.
>have a
>implying it was yours to give my property
Stirner isn't utopian, he is just pointing out what is in the worker's own self interest, what power they have. Rand overlooked this self interest in favor of the interest of capitalists.
Stirner himself did everything for himself. Were workers to do the same, we probably wouldn't be living in capitalism very long.
But regardless, I just use Stirner and related memes to make a philosophical point in argument, the utility is self evident. In the absence of race, nations and other spooks, the ordinary Sup Forumsyp or rightist has little claim to the self interests of workers. He provides a valuable debate tactic and perspective, any descriptions of possible systems of the future he provides are left, probably intentionally, vague, so we can be the ones to fill them.
These threads are shite.
Spiderman thread?