Think more about it. Gauss is everywhere. Income is normally distributed like IQ and height.
Capitalism is perfect. Whenever someone tries to rig Gauss, Gauss fucks him up.
Think more about it. Gauss is everywhere. Income is normally distributed like IQ and height.
Capitalism is perfect. Whenever someone tries to rig Gauss, Gauss fucks him up.
Individual differences between humans exist such as intellect, physical ability, work ethic etc etc
If you control for equality of opportunity, which any decent conservative will value, you still won't get equality of outcome because people are different.
And this is fine, trying to impose equality is not only totalitarian but also doomed to fail.
This is accurate. What is your objection to it?
it's fairly accurate though - at least when contrasted with left wing politics
Income is not normally distributed. IQ and height are normally distributed. Income and wealth follow a power law distribution (driven by positive feedback/exponential behavior).
Life isn't fair m8
That's pretty much true though. Even libertarians, the supposedly "nice" right wingers, believe that inequality is inevitable/normal due to a variety of factors that are either the fault of the individual or an inherent trait which no amount of reform could ameliorate.
>Right-wing politics hold that social stratification and social inequality are inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable
What's wrong with this sentence?
Right wing is garbage
You claim to be the religious wing yet Christ and God are against Darwinism of any sort, social or otherwise, 100%. Then you break it even more by ignoring give to Caesar that which is his and to God that which is His