Charlemagne: Father of GERMANY & Christ

Red pill yourself on Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne. The man who with Christ, saved Europe from being anarchist fags drinking druid piss aka SJWs.

Now the EU is atheist and SJW faggotry continues to explode.

Why not use what works--bring back the Crusaders and Inquisitors and get shit done instead of being a keyboard fag.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/0TwfiNjvcYo?list=PLRGjclMs6x2Kgctqns2WNEEbxHE5jU2ZZ&t=274
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

nigga wut

Wasn't Charlemagne French ?

Also
>holy
>roman
Always gives me the keks

Charles Martel the Hammer was more redpilled and based though

you are retarded and know nothing but john green memes
he was frankish not that you have any idea what that means and Voltaire's joke from the late 18th century is not applicable to Charlemagne's Holy Roman Empire in 800 when it was Holy, Roman and an Empire

True Christians are based and have always fought Islam, Jews and SJW scum.

I don't want to hear any Nordic shit from people living in CucksBERG.

"Ya Ya," lulz

>christcucks

I'll pass.

infidel pls leave

I haven't got that dlc for Total war:Attila yet, so I wouldn't know.

>He was Frankish
>He also had 100% Roman blood

You sound like a Somalian in Sweden

Massacre of Verden, never forget.

Christcucks murdering fellow Europeans for a Jewish sect.

I'm interested in looking up videos that talk about how all these people related to Queen Victoria and others become monarchs all around Europe. Is Charlemagne a good place ti start?

you have no idea what you're talking about
the Roman in HRE does not refer to Charlemagne's ancestry

He was a German and conquered Rome, and legitmized by the Pope thus Holy, Roman, and an Empire.

Richard the lionheart actually befriended Saladin when Saladin, upon hearing of the death of Richard's horse, gifted him a new one. They both had a lot of mutual respect for each other.

The socio-political situation in the Levant was much more complex the
An the "hurr durr ebil mooslems" nonsense the stormniggers on this board always espouse. A lot of the time the Venetiens were supplying the Muslims to attack and weaken Venice's European rivals.

Oh I'm sorry, you must follow Frued, Einstein and Dr Who.

These are the really warriors of your country Cuckstein

I'd start with Hammurabi.

Almost, but
>German
He was a Frank. There was no such thing as Germany or France back then.

the bromance between Saladin and Richard has probably been overstated by the legend

don't forget the fundamental facts here, Richard (and countless others) traveled to the Levant with the explicit purpose of defending Christendom from the Saracens and considered it their sacred duty and they were somewhat successful in the third crusade
this was very much a religious conflict fought by very devout men for their god and no amount of revisionism will change that
the fact that not everyone in Europe was as devout as them and that there were other political struggles going on that could overshadow it (most notoriously in the fourth crusade) doesn't change that

Of Germania, they were all German tribes and spoke almost the same language.

I mean in Europe specifically.

He was a Frank and the Pope crowned him because he was the only leader willing to support the Roman church.

I am not sure he conquered Rome. Wasn't it the fact that he won over the Langobards and therefor securing Rome?

Anyway he did that all of that because Charlemagne was a black man.

Im not into jewish sand people religions.

Are you sure about the language part? There still is a huge stretch over what is assumed to have been spoken by all the different tribes but it was definitely not one and the same language as that much is made clear by the chroniclers of that time.

WE

The most important thing to take away from the history lessons about the Merovingians and Carolingians is that whatever good you achieve to build there will be a generation coming along that fucks up everything up.

Now you can ask yourself if we are at the high times or the low times at the moment and then you can take a look at your generation and the next one.

Correct. Charles Martel was the prophetic savior of Christendom.

What do you think Islam is doing? Eurocucks always get cucked by the Judeochristlamic religions from the Middle-East. Christcuckery was the first wave, Islam will be another readjusting to the inherit degeneracy of the barbarian:

>The evidence of the sagas and laws shows that male homosexuality was regarded in two lights: there was nothing at all strange or shameful about a man having intercourse with another man if he was in the active or "manly" role, however the passive partner in homosexual intercourse was regarded with derision. It must be remembered, however, that the laws and sagas reflect the Christian consciousness of the Icelander or Norwegian of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, well after the pagan period. The myths and legends show that honored gods and heroes were believed to have taken part in homosexual acts, which may indicate that pre-Christian Viking Scandinavia was more tolerant of homosexuality, and history is altogether silent as to the practice of lesbianism in the Viking Age.

The barbarian anglo-saxon teutonic couldn't keep himself from fucking animals either:

>The secular laws of Viking Age Iceland do not mention homosexuality. The only place where homosexuality is documentably prohibited is by the Christian Church. The Icelandic Homily Book (ca. 1200 C.E.) has a sermon which states that among grave sins are "those appalling secret sins perpetrated by men who respect men no more than women, or violate quadrupeds." Bishop Þorlákr Þórhallson of Skáholt's Penetential (ca. 1178-1193 C.E.) lists penances of nine or ten years that include flogging for "adultery between males, or that committed by men on quadrupeds," and says of lesbianism that "if women satisfy each other they shall be ordered the same penance as men who perform the most hideous adultery between them or with a quadruped." (Sorenson 26) Christian belief condemns both the active and passive roles of homosexual intercourse, whereas the pagan Scandinavians attached disapproval only to the male who was homosexually passive.

>Homosexuality was not regarded by the Viking peoples as being evil, perverted, innately against the laws of nature or any of the other baggage about the concept that Christian belief has provided Western culture. Rather, it was felt that a man who subjected himself to another in sexual affairs would do the same in other areas, being a follower rather than a leader, and allowing others to do his thinking or fighting for him. Thus, homosexual sex was not what was condemned, but rather the failure to stand for one's self and make one's own decisions.

Their own gods were homosexuals.
>Another aspect to the question of homosexuality is the fact that certain of the gods, heroes and highly respected priests of the gods, apparently indulged in homosexual, "unmanly" or "questionable" practices. Loki, of course, is clearly bisexual as he certainly took the female role sexually at least during the encounter with the giant's stallion in Gylfaginning, which says that "Loki had had such dealings with Svaðilfari (the stallion) that sometime later he bore a foal," the most wonderful of all horses, Óðinn's eight-legged steed Sleipnir (Sturluson, Prose Edda, 68).

>Óðinn himself, the Allfather and King of the Gods, was justly accused of ergi or unmanliness because of his practice of seiðr or women's magic, as learned from the goddess Freyja. We are not certain what it is about seiðr that made it "unmanly" for a man to practice the art: it could be anything from the idea of cowardice as a result of being able to harm your enemies through magic rather than in open battle, to overt sexual rituals involving the seiðr-practitioner as the passive sexual partner, or even as the passive homosexual partner.

It was God's plan that White people would be the main people he would work with after the continual failure of the Jewish people to believe in and follow him. Unfortunately we've followed the same path of the Jews though and have abandoned God. I believe we'll come back though.

Charlemagne wasn't German he was Dutch.

He was Dutch. His real name is Karel de Grote by the way.

FYI: cucks don't kill Muslims, Jews, and Atheists.

>dutch

>Wilhelmus van Nassouwe
>ben ik, van Duitsen bloed,
>den vaderland getrouwe
>blijf ik tot in den dood.

>Swamp Germans

Hallo mein Freund. Wir sind Brüder dir.

He was Frankish. The Franks were a Germanic tribe. France gets its name paetially from that, mainly from the Francisca, a throwing axe.

This is also where Native Americans got their tomahawks from, during the French colonies.

France in German is Frankreich (realm of the Franks)

source? ive never heard about this. ive only read that he made his daughters never get married

Charlemagne was not from Peru.

Bullshit. He was madly in love with his third wife and he loved his daughters so much that he always had them around him.

Holy is because Frederick I wanted to to conquer Rome and the Papacy.

Roman because it was the sucessor of Rome. The Pope crowned Charlemagne"King of romans"

>Christianity destroys Europe
>Christianity floods Europe and America with unlimited shitskins and muslims
>the Pope says those who build walls aren't Christian
>the Pope compares muslims to Jesus
>c'mon guys, the answer is MORE of the ideology that teaches us "there is no jew nor gentile, no man nor woman"

youtu.be/0TwfiNjvcYo?list=PLRGjclMs6x2Kgctqns2WNEEbxHE5jU2ZZ&t=274

>king of the Francs
>ruled France
>Father of Germany
dropped

Europeans didnt seen themselves as their brethen back in the days. It was more tribal(in barbarian land) or social in the civilized europe

Actually, it was christianism that make europeans think that europeans were all kinsmen. They based their identity on religion, and as most europeans had adopted christianism into the middle ages, they started too see each other as "cousins"

>holy
>roman

This is truly some meme tier history.

Which was the last standing provincial exarchy loyal to the Western Emperors?

Which German tribe fought against the Arian heresy alongside the Roman Empire?

Who aided the Pope, the Bishop of Rome, the authority in Rome for centuries then and organized a latin state in the heart of Italy?

Who were crowned in Rome as Emperors and protectors of the Faith?

Explains swede faggotry. They have a cuck gene(s) in their whole lineage.

It was simply the church's advocacy for intermarriages outside of their own familias which in the end diminished the power of their heads.

Christians aren't Cucks and SJeWs. Jesus was the final sacrifice, you can't be a pacifist and be a Christian--that would make you a different religion.

According to Hitler Jesus is based and YOU ARE ALL THE KEKS

In defence of the Pope, there no reason he would support a murica wall build by a infidel to keep believers outside.

The duty of the Pope is with catholics, not protestants

The
NOT Holy
NOT Roman
And Certainly NOT an Empire
Confederation of independent states.

It could not be holy, but it was roman and a empire.

The Pope used to crown the HRE with the title of King of the romans. If the Pope says you're the king of the romans, then your empire is trully "roman".

Empire only means "power". Basically anything could be considered a empire. In middle ages the modern definition of empire didnt existed

Can I just take a second and make a comment about this.

...

This is Sup Forums in a nutshell. You are literally using Hitler to defend Jesus unironically.

As a Pagan National Socialist, I agree with Hitler on the topic of Jesus. He was a good man, likely an Ayran, who stood up to the Jews.

It truly is a shame that Evropa has been destroyed in his name.

But that is besides the point. I just wanted to point out the fact that, only on Sup Forums.org do you find someone making this argument haha

Culturally Roman
Linguistically Old High German
Ethnically Franco-Germanic