Who you got?
Who you got?
Other urls found in this thread:
armedforces.eu
ukdefencejournal.org.uk
europeangeostrategy.org
twitter.com
USA and Russia
Well nukes make the whole thing moot, but ignoring that I'm pretty sure America could take on the rest of the world singlehandedly (in a conventional war, none of that Vietnam/sandpeople shit)
When you get israel, you get america by extension.
And Saudi Arabia
USA, Germany, North Korea, Saudi Arabia
or
USA and Russia
anyone who doesn't choose the US as part of their team is dumb
...
this
USA + Israel + Saudi Arabia should come as a trio
China + Taiwan + North Korea
Russia + Ukraine + Belarus
so much this
USA
Deutschland
Turkey or Israel
>China + Taiwan
USA
France
Iran
logistics is important
US, UK, Israel and NK.
Either USA and Russia or USA France and Israel
>no suomi
I WANT TO FIGHT WITH MEMES REEEEE
Russia, Iran and even if not listed Syria, give the rest of the money to africans
The Federal Republic of the United States of America and the Former Soviet Federative Socialist Republic of Russia. The rest of the world and it's retarded military equipment can fuck off really.
Even thought I get into a lot of shitflinging with Russians on /k/, i have to admit that i love the hard-edged personality and aggressive aesthetic of most Russian military equipment.
...
Israel
Iran
Russia
North Korea
not as good a combo as you'd think
Explain yourself immediately
10 North Koreas or 5 Israels.
...
Chinks are shit at war
>china + taiwan
what did he mean by THIS
2 muricas
are you being serious user or just trolling us
china + taiwan
>us
Sweetie, please don't use inclusive pronouns here.
Give me 10 N. Korea
Best Korea ten times
china has the resources to sustain a war for decades, if not centuries
with USA on your team, you already kill stuff easy, china just makes sure there is no lack of supplies
no other country can offer that much
America Twice.
Everyone is good at war when they have America on their side, not to mention that China has 1.4 billion people to work with.
>North Korea
>Israel
>Russia
>Turkey
USA + China
No they are not.
Do you even realize that China today is far larger than China in 200bc?
t. Chang
Now this burger is thinking with his MAGA hat on
USA, UK, Israel
No one can stand before the eternal Anglo-Israelis
Unironically this.
Not really, the Brits are a massive liability when you truly consider the scenario. That $3 and $2 would be better spent on someone else as the Brits would be quickly reduced to a deadweight.
1) America x2 (If we could somehow gear one for defense action and the other as an aggressor squad)
2) US + Russia*
*(If they could PLEASE got their shit together, they'd be peerless allies.)
3) US + China (The Brits have a world-beater navy, but their undersized industrial ability and limited resources forces me to look past them. So China because it's nice to have an industrial peer who can take on a shitload of casualties without flinching)
Hard mode: None of the $5 countries
>US and Russia become one team in WW3
Who is enemy?
How much fucking fun this would be
Everyone else
Eat shit mapleniggers
>America
>Russia
Literally best alliance, how can the world even compete?
...
America, and I use the leftover $5 to get a burger and fries.
I don't know why I found this so funny, but I sure did.
HOL UP
UK has a more higher ready rate and a effective army than Russia due to them spending all there dosh on t-72s
UAE should replace saudi Arabia And Russia should replace the UK
>They have 70 fucking thousand tanks/armor/artillery
'YO HOL UP' britbong.
Firstly, the word you were looking for there, was "their".
Secondly, what's wrong with new tanks (that aren't T-72's, by the way ... )
Lastly, you are an idiot. The UK does not have a more effective /army/ than Russia. The two aren't remotely comparable. Even if their readiness level is moderately worse, their size is massively larger.
are you retarded or can you not read?
They keep shit like MT-LBs and BTR-50s which bolsters there numbers
in reality they have around 200+ ready tanks
oh wait
>yank post
PS: 'a more higher ready rate'
'more higher'
Sounds like you're the fuckin' more higher one here mate.
Merkel's fourth empire
>implying there's any possibility to defeat a combo that consists of USA + China
no.
shalt even address your last statement if you can't comprehend whats wrong with keeping a tank in service that uses an engine from the fucking 60s
>they aren't t-72s
not talking about t-90s they still have around 600 t-72BA's and around 200 t-64BMs
if you stopped sniffing petrol you would understand the gulf between a country with a functioning naval fleet and a well maintained armed forces and a country that relies on poorly train cavalry troops using outdated and stupidly expensive equipment
had a bit to drink
your just reinforced my point they refuse to retire any of there equipment
>This PakiEnglish spastic chimping out about the British Armed Forces in here.
I'd love to sit here and have a discussion about the paramount importance of strategic depth in a military engagement, but I get the feeling that I'd be talking to some 4 Star Wikipedia General.
>it's a tyrone can't comprehend the gulf war post
how sad that the yank education system fails them the poor souls
This. You can spend all day screeching about MUH QUALITY and (rightfully, I'll admit) bash Russia's materiel maintenance, but 9999/10000 times, I'll bet on Russia winning any conventional war against Britain, assuming no ally involvement.
Mate, they're keeping more (550) of their most modern type of MBT (save amarta of course, since that's brand new) in service than your entire fleet of tanks together (407).
.... And then they've got the fucking rest of the older tanks as backup in case they need them. Aaaaaaaand the shitloads of arty. Aaaaaaaaaaaand the shitloads of AFVs. And since you bring up the navy (we were talking army before) - Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand the shitloads larger airforce. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand the shitloads larger navy.
So what's your big point here bongistani?
That you're even worse than Russia without its reserves?
Shame :(
PS: What the hell is overpriced about Russian tech? Virtually everything we make is more cost-effective than the west.
you're trying to engage a Battlefield 4 whizkid in a conversation about real life military planning, don't expect to get too far with him. There is a lot of shit one can talk about the Russian military, but it really shouldn't be coming from a Brit.
>larger navy
there fleet is early cold war only realy respectable ships are the udaloy but even still a pathetic fleet full of over heating radar systems
>PS: What the hell is overpriced about Russian tech? Virtually everything we make is more cost-effective than the west.
t-64 and t-80 along with there su-27s, mig-25 and su-25 lastly there fucking ATGM systems konkers and there new metis uses some stupid band system that requires every missile to have a bunch of tech inside to bypass softkill systems
ukdefencejournal.org.uk
>Mate, they're keeping more (550) of their most modern type of MBT
t-90 still uses a shitty old engine though i wont deny it's a decent tank they rely too much on soft kill and so use fuck all armor
t.dequan tyrone desanta
i do hope you learn to read one day maybe then you can read up on the gulf war or better yet the yomkipur war such a shame
>This infinitely bootydunkirkd concert bombing survivor who keeps trying to convince me that his 4th world military is to be taken seriously
>tryone can't comprehend life outside sharting and getting shot
rather sad
Ideally, America twice. If not, then either China or Russia as an ally. The rest of the world is below retarded when it comes to logistics so they're basically useless.
USA is Israelite colony
/thread
literally who the fuck else would you need?
Lmao you don't know about the secret brazilian stockpile of nukes
Fpbp
War of The Planet of The Apes is not a documentary you fatfuck
UK, France, Germany and Best Korea.
>a fucking border skirmish with 3 injured on both sides
Wow!
Kek'd
>ukdefencejournal.org.uk
>.uk
Are they really this delusional lmao. Not only did they place themselves in 2nd but a whole tier above other countries
>mexico
>countries that can beat us:
>zero
France is literally the only one who comes close, nobody else can match us
russia, germany, turkey
>A puppet country totally relying on america while wanking about its past glory
Magnificient.
>France is literally the only one who comes close, nobody else can match us
m8, we're independant militarly, you're not
Gotta pick up the US since they're at my border
So US + Russia
Russia
Germany
North Korea
Saudi Arabia
One clusterfuck of a coalition to rule them all
USA+UK+Israel
Judeao-Anglosphere has ruled the world for centuries
For centuries to come they will rule over filthy continentals
Russia and USA
Can't lose.
I respect your patriotism ruskie, but you must know that you could never make it.
>200+ ready tanks
wrong
also MT-LB is the best military vehicle in the world
China
Germany
Turkey
>UK same price as Germany
Fookin bargain
USA UK Turkey
clearly can't speak english
it's okay lad i know how it is in that shithole
>INDEPENDENT
do you want me to define that for you?
europeangeostrategy.org
independent to surrender to anyone you try to fight
UK and Germany should be 2$
china
britain
iran
>MT-LB is the best military vehicle in the world
please upgrade it's engine then and increase it's track width i fucking love them too
BMP-3 is an utter German engineering tier joke
...
USA
Germany
either Turkey or Israel
so would Russia and France be 1? don't think that is fair on france fairly sure they are more capable than the Russian army lad
still wew first time i have met a non retarded Russian
10 best koreas. I'd fuck you all up.
Nah, high quality army and good navy.
>BMP-3 is an utter German engineering tier joke
Wrong
>please upgrade it's engine then and increase it's track width
What's the point if we have more combat ready MTLBs than your country of a joke people
you okay lad?
you do know you are russian right?