If you are not an Ancap, you are complicit in kikery

If you are not an Ancap, you are complicit in kikery.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OAJyh6Poifw
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

Do you realize in an ancap society you have to work to fe successful? There is no lobby, central banks or pesky lawyers.

In an ancap society you are essentially a serf for the landowner

it's just feudalism 2.0

Yeah you'll be working, but only the king is getting any money

...

The Jews that have contributed to Anarcho-Capitalism / Agoism are not given attention by the Jewish media. It is almost as if they are the few that have spoken up against their own people.

The whole point of AnCap is that everyone goes their own way. AnCap isn't Right Authoritarian.

I would love to truly own land. Not rent from the government.

It results in rule by whoever has the most organized army usually run by a strongman who eventually claims to be divinely appointed (king)

good luck preventing armies of conquest raping and pillaging without some sort of collective action and organization.

don't pretend the kikes wouldn't take full advantage of an ancap society.

The king is aggressing on the peasant's property. The peasant homesteaded the land. The king only has a governmental claim. LRN2 natural law

They would! So would everyone else. They would have no authoritarian advantage.

The king has an army so he wins by default

the peasants have some farm equipment

guess whose claim actually matters?

whoever is best at fighting, raping, pillaging, looting, etc has the advantage

What king? What army? What is he going to sew some dragon teeth?

That is correct. I would love to see a 'king' throw-down with a family of peasants. I wonder if the strong homesteaders or the fatass would win?

... The people who want to join him for money?

And we all know egoism contributed greatly to Anarcho-Capitalism.

And he earned / inherited / ha claim to that money how?

Whoever wants to claim land and property by force will do so turning anyone else into their de facto serfs

The world was already dominated by state societies a long time ago and for good reason. They are far more powerful economically and militarily than disorganized tribes and small communities.

The king would destroy them with his army

I smell a kike.

conquest and then taxation

it must be you then

OK, king. Go ahead and amass your army and try to take some property. See how well it works out.

Look at this group of Jews that the majority of Jews dislike. It really makes you think.

By collecting things people want? Goods can stand in for money. The point is he could sway people to follow him against you.

historically it worked incredibly well

Ancaps are too autistic to understand history though, sadly

When a society has no government or collective defense it becomes easy picking for conquest.

Most jews support their overall policies of mass immigration, globalism, deregulation, neoliberalism, etc

You do realize that anti-semites hate Jews for being capitalists, right? Oh, and btw, in the United States the anarchist movement was predominately Jewish. 2/3rds of the Americans who volunteered to fight for the Spanish Republican anarchists were Jewish. Emma Goldman, Murray Bookchin, and Noam Chomsky, the major anarchist public intellectuals in the US, are all Jewish.
Not to mention anarcho-capitalism is heavily influenced by Ayn Rand, a Jew. Her most successful follower is Alan Greenspan, also a Jew.

OP, just how fucking retarded are you?

or by just forcing people to hand over their valuables and slave away for the nobility

without a government literally nothing is stopping you from taking whatever you want as long as you have your group of mercenaries/army with you.

A lot of good goy in this thread. Good goy that miss their kings.

Ironically jews push for both communism and international financial globalism

the goys consistently get hoodwinked by both movements

>shill explicitly for neofeudalism
>say anyone else wants to be ruled by KANGZ

Good goy. A king appointed with divine right to rule is "capitalistic".

Princes don't necessarily rule by "divine mandate", its just a useful tool for perceived legitimacy. Anyone who rules over an expanse of land whether you wanna call it ownership or whatever is the Prince of that land.

A king/queen is a sort of super sovereign that the other allegiance swearing princes answer to and doesn't have to actually exist.

If Ancap society ever happens I look forward to carving out a Duchy for myself

Ditto. But by and large the people crying for an ancap society will be the first to perish. The ones that survive with be toiling in Feudalism 2.0

what about anarcho primitivism?

>ignoring the fact that anarcho and libertarian movements are also popularised and pushed by kikes
>ignoring the fact that homogeneous ethno-nationalism is the one government that kikes universally rail against and """coincidentally""" modeled their own Israel after.

yeah I wonder what the correct choice could possible be?

preaching to the choir, friend

Someone needs to add anarchy and libertarian movements to this and it would be fucking perfect. I am sick of the three-way rock paper scissors arguments that always occur and would be nice to beat them all down at once.

Not an argument.

>king
>anarcho-capitalism

haha

that's the case in the system we have today, where the best at working the system (i.e. ones that could afford lawyers)

if you can create wealth with the only restriction being the NAP (i.e. not hurting anyone else), that allows for the betterment of all.

Socialists & National Socialists BTFO:
youtube.com/watch?v=OAJyh6Poifw

>if you can create wealth with the only restriction being the NAP (i.e. not hurting anyone else), that allows for the betterment of all.

which is meaningless since the property rights are not enforceable

Without some government to enforce laws, armies begin taking over land and claiming whatever they want, followed by the leaders taken ownership of the land and naming themselves sovereign (king) while everyone else gets to be destitute peasants with no rights.

That's how history works and progressed for millennia. Your autistic LARPing is just a product of your delusion that everyone follows your fantastic "ideal". You are no different from a communist.

>if you can create wealth with the only restriction being the NAP

That's a pretty big if. Even bigger if I happen to own a arms factory and have a lot of friends who think I should be some sort of a ruler.