Sup Forums approved literature

Give me some books that Sup Forums would agree with.

I'll start:

Atlas Shrugged
1984
The Wealth of Nations

Other urls found in this thread:

www40.zippyshare.com/v/3ZCs5Fon/file.html
www55.zippyshare.com/v/2x4eo2fy/file.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_James_Cowperthwaite
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Bump

...

>Atlas
not Sup Forums approved. retard approved. regardless of the woman's philosophy the book is a turd

brave new world is better than 1984

try

crime and punishment

that is a great book

also war and peace

The Road to Serfdom worth buying?

Read Crime and Punishment, great book though found the translation quite heavy.

Brave New World, I'll add to the list.

I see the value in Atlas Shrugged but you are really far off the mark saying it's Sup Forums approved.

Ayn Rand is not popular here. A lot of people see is fedora tipping tier.

www40.zippyshare.com/v/3ZCs5Fon/file.html

Reminder that Ayn Rand spent her twilight years living off social welfare.

www55.zippyshare.com/v/2x4eo2fy/file.html

>muh roads

That again. She advocated rational self interest. She also saw tax as theft. She also spent years paying in.

Sounds like it was in her rational self interest to take back some of what was taken from her, doesn't it?

I don't see her people who bring this same thing up can't wrap their head around that.

Sup Forums is not a libertarian board, its a natsoc board. Ayn Rand is absolutely not approved.

Pic related is what every Sup Forumsack should read.

Posting it until it sticks

>She also saw tax as theft
And yet she was a minarchist who believed the government should monopolize the use of force and control the police, courts and military. How would those services get funding, I wonder, if not through taxation?

She spent her twilight years getting her own stolen wealth returned to her.

(((Ayn Rand)))

I don't think so bud.

>1984
You realize most of the people here honestly believe we need a nationalist/fascist government, right?

>She advocated rational self interest
No she advocated greed. There's a difference.

>nationalist
not a bad thing
>fascist
1984 was communist

the yurope novels are a kafkaesque parody of modern liberalism and the dangers it poses

There are some stormfags on Sup Forums but also a lot of legitimately intelligent people.

Reading "The Rights of Man" by Thomas Paine right now, highly recommend it.

...

...

Read kaczynski, technological slavery

1984 Is a great book. The big brother was a commie government that enslaved and murdered It's own people.

waste of quads
you fucking nigger

>but also a lot of legitimately intelligent people.


exactly, thank you for proving his point

+ industrial society and it's future

Fascist and communist governments are both totalitarian, which 1984 was strongly against.

More race stuff.

National Socialism is a retarded idea that is supported here by retarded edge lords.

>reading books written by women

how cucked can you get you feminist libtard?

Im reading the constitution of Liberty right now by him and it's pretty good so far. So I would imagine that it is a good book. Road to Serfdom was written before Constitution of Liberty.

Read as much Thomas Sowell as possible.

pls help

where can I find books for Sup Forums women? Like Donovan's The Way of Men.. but for women. Preferrably with a christian background.
All I have are based mom's books but they're obviously not focussed on traditional/conservative views as much.

...

...

Why hasn't the obvious been posted yet?

Dysgenics, by Richard Lynn

...

What about David Duke?

Also

and the sequel that satarizes black american culture and the jewish liberal media that props it up

thomas sowell is a dumb fucking nigger.

Can a man be red-pilled so much he becomes black-pilled?

Why the fuck is hazlitt shilled so much on this sight?

He's not an economist. He's a journalist. He legitimately has no idea at all about economics and wrote a book simply to try and trick cuckservatives into shitty Austrian policies.

Please, read from an actual economist. Read Friedman, or even Rothbard. At least these guys understand mathematics and economics at a level to give them some credibility.

>woman
>nontraditional
>opposes collectivism (NO IM NOT TALKING ABOUT COMMUNISM FCK OFF, collectivism =/= communism)

More interested in the political and economic philosophies here than the anti-Semitic, anti-establishment pleb side of things.

...

>jew witch
>fedora-tipper
>greed and selfishness are virtues

No thank you.

Unabomber manifesto
1984
Brave new world
Mein kampf
Mediations
Starship troopers
The hero with a thousand faces
Leviathan

...

>unabomber manifesto
that man is a genius

don't forget revolt agaist the modern age and riding the tiger

Anybody read his new book? Pretty good imo, a lot more practical than the way of men.

Have you read Economics in One Lesson?

Ayn Rand is based

Altruism is bad

Collectivism is failure

Capitailism is moral

Reality exists

We precivieve reality through our senses

>most people dont even understand objectivism

of mice and men is good

also the illiad by homer

and

metamorphoses by ovid

and the hunchback of notre dame by hugo

...just saying

kek
literally the opposite

The foundation of ideas about race that influenced early 20th century eugenics programs.

It was Hitler's favorite.

>Real economics.
>Friedman and Rothbard.

Maximum kek. These guys are experts at useless rhetoric that isn't exactly false, but completely fucking useless.

No she advocated rational self interest. Have you read her books? She advocated greed too, if it was in your rational self interest.

She didn't believe in greed for the sake of it if it meant taking from people.

She didn't advocate for greedy corporations who act like parasites and create monopoly. There are interviews on youtube of her saying this.

I'm reading it right now. It's amazing.

This is a really good book more /k/ than Sup Forums but its great

>Be me, summber b4 college
>Decide to read the full 10 volume unedited version of War and Peace
>Literally 100+ characters with most names ending in "ski's" since russian names.
>Give up half way and go back to the editted version

I like books but lads War and Peace in full is impossible.

>all women are feminists

ayn rand is totally not a feminist....have you even read her stuff

One of my guilty pleasures.

Libertarianism has the same goals as communism, the concentration of resources and enslavement of all people in the hands of a small oligarchy.

It was invented by the same subversive kikes, and is their way of playing both sides and win either way.

Either you get centrally planned communism, or monopoly capitalism. The results are similar enough.

Yes. It's complete shit.

Rothbard is bad. I acknowledge that. But at least he spent a good number of years studying the subject.

Friedman is better. He actually used empirical data, as economics should be done.

I'm no libertarian or free market faggot, but monetarism and Friedman actually had some evidence backing it.

I also kinda liked Atlas Shrugged

It's good at exposing how much of an ugly ideology communism is, but her philosophy is long winded and pretentious, and the book itself is too robotic, her characters too 2D.

>reading

>American education

(((You)))

>Friedman is better. He actually used empirical data, as economics should be done.

So basically you're not a fan of Austrian Economics.

People should only read Brave New World k owing that its author's brother was the president of the eugenics society, founder of the WWF and UNESCO. His grandfather was known as Darwin's Bulldog for his strong defense of evolution and the Huxley's are actually related to the Darwins. It's a great book like 1984 but never poses a solution to the problem, and is really just a guide for the oligarch's eugenics like metropolis or The Giver.

(((My))) doubles confirm reading is for faggots.

Read these in order to achieve ultimate enlightenment

yes, very good. I'm 3/4 way through it.
I've personally not seen him shilled that much. Never mentioned by name. Sounds like you're just salty about Austrian school. He mentioned many many times that he wasn't writing about how there should be no regulation of X or government program Y, just that there will be consequences that people do not see and that we must take into account those things that are unseen before jumping to write laws.

wait wait wait, HOL UP. People honestly like Ayn Rand's books?.
I thought it was only a meme.

Some taxation for those things not for things that can be given to the markets

do some more reading.

so fucking sharp

shitposting, I see

lol

Yeah, Sup Forums is full of edgy kids

Fuck no, she advocated voluntary taxation.

Ayn Rand is a Jewess, anyone who likes her should join her in the ovens.

Argie user knows where the money is

>Argie
Kikey*

>itt we post the same 10 books that are always posted

>doesn't post a book

>He actually used empirical data, as economics should be done.

I am literally leading a largely data gathering team in photonics and I just feel confused when I hear econocucks pretend to treat human action empirically. This is genuinely scary that people would actually reify themselves.

Reminder that based JJ Cowperthwaite turned Hong Kong from a secondary naval base into the freest and most prosperous city in the world with (almost) a single measure : banning economic statistics, not because they are evil but only to prevent economists from tainting HK laws.
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_James_Cowperthwaite

Suicide Pact - Andrew Napolitano
The Conservative Handbook - Phil Valentine

What are the best books on race?

Gaddafi's Little Green Book. Hard copies are rare these days, so you might have to settle with getting a PDF.

>Gaddafi's Little Green Book
Huh. I didn't know about it.
tl dr?

Captive Universe

> Atlas Shrugged
(((Shit)))-tier.

> 1984
Low-energy. I can agree with it as much, as I agree with GoT. Yeah, the public relations are reviewed somewhat. But the esoterics, behind the scenes, the elite relations with nation - not at all. "Oh there is some proles", "oh someone threw shit at joffrey". Besides that all goes according to divine plan of all-righteous all-knowing elite.

Fuck this, they could not made hitler into power during bier-putch, and ended up electing him, while internazies just withstanded the election allowing him to win. They cant work with major population, they do not know how to work with progress (not idea of progressiveness, that postulates that we need to destroy our culture and then everything will turn in roses, but true progress like disruptive innovation), so they end up in luddism every fucking time.

Today they holding back MSRE and hydrogen-propellants in everyday machinery. They even created this space-X scam to undermine the hydrogen-community efforts by governmental subsidies.

this list looks interesting. can I start reading those without any academic knowledge of economy?

The Races of Europe by Coon (yep, the best physical anthropologist in history is named Coon).
The Origin of Races by Coon.
Race by Baker is good too.