Why are so many people on the alt-right science deniers? They deny climate change, the religious ones deny evolution exists, the ones that do believe in evolution pretends their narrative of human evolution is true despite decades of evidence against them?
It seems like most people on the alt right suffer special snowflake syndrome where they believe they can ignore reality and believe whatever they want, and that somehow posting memes of their beliefs makes them true.
Why does Sup Forums hate science?
I guess you guys can't handle reality.
Your only arguments are:
a) Not a scientific peer reviewed paper [sic]
b) Not enough data [sic]
c) "Muh debunked Lewontin's fallacy again" [sic]
>they can ignore reality
You're right, every race is the same. All they need is just more money and dem programs and they'll be space-faring in no time.
And you are the same ridiculous guy who always gets butthurt here.
Dawkins on Lewontin:
"However small the racial partition of the total variation may be, if such racial characteristics as there are highly correlate with other racial characteristics, they are by definition informative, and therefore of taxonomic significance."
Where are you now? No response?
It's not even a surprise. Don't come back.
If its not a scientific paper then it's not credible scientific evidence.
It never says "not enough data"
>lewontins fallacy
A bad critique made by an economist. You take replicate the results of any tests of genetic variation.
>Sup Forums is one person
Also, I'm talking about science denial in general. This guy obviously linked a bunch of scientific journals and you're saying they're all wrong.
If you have contrary evidence, why not publish it?
Your data may be accurate, but your interpretation is utterly false, sir.
What interpretation?
Those are verbatim quotes from the papers.
this image is out of date, apparently many African populations DO have Neanderthal admixture
>get out of my safe space
This was always true. Only a small percent of africans, namely sub saharans who ancestors never left africa, lack the genetic similarity to neanderthals.
even some sub-Saharan African populations, like the Maasai, have a bit of Neandertal
"If its not a scientific paper then it's not credible scientific evidence."
A scientific study remains a scientific evidence wherever has been published, while respecting the scientific method.
>A bad critique made by an economist.
Dawkins is not an economist, moron. [sic]
>You take replicate the results of any tests of genetic variation.
You still don't understand why Lewontin theory is a fallacy. Educate yourself before.
>Sup Forums is one person
Implying you aren't the same butthurted nigger.
The Neanderthal admixture in sub-Saharan population is practically irrelevant when you compare it with European.
>A scientific study remains a scientific evidence wherever has been published, while respecting the scientific method.
Yes, and those ones marked as 'not publshed papers' were not published papers.
Lewontin made the discovery that most genetic variation was found within populations rather than between them. Others like Edwards tried to argue that this meant you could still divide humans into races, but even he admitted the data was correct.
However even as we did more and more research over the past 40 years (Lewontins paper was published in the 70s) Edwards was proven wrong.
"Lewontins fallacy" is just a retarded meme you use to dismiss any scientific evidence put against you.
>The fact that, given enough genetic data, individuals can be correctly assigned to their populations of origin is compatible with the observation that most human genetic variation is found within populations, not between them. It is also compatible with our finding that, even when the most distinct populations are considered and hundreds of loci are used, individuals are frequently more similar to members of other populations than to members of their own population. Thus, caution should be used when using geographic or genetic ancestry to make inferences about individual phenotypes.
translation: if we take enough noise data we can fit the results to our liking
You're really moron, nobody is discussing Lewontin data (even race realist except it), your entire argument is a fucking straw man.
evoandproud.blogspot.com.es
>You're really moron, nobody is discussing Lewontin data
c) "Muh debunked Lewontin's fallacy again" [sic]
Again, you're really moron.
Lewontin's fallacy doesn't means that his data was wrong, but he was comparing different things. You don't even know what you're talking about.
evoandproud.blogspot.com.es
Go back to the ghetto, nigger, this discussion is too much for you.
>muh blogs disprove scientific evidence!
OK
It's impossible to try to educate a moron like you.
Bye.
>this woman tier bitching
sage
Posting on Sup Forums and blogs is not an education.
Actually getting a college education is an education. If you care so much about human evolution and genetcs, why not study it? You can take free online classes in tons of places.
But no.. you would rather post memes and deny science.
White guilt studies major, I presume?
White guilt isn't real. People aren't responsible for things that happened 100 years ago. The only people talking about white guilt are people that should feel guilty for the things they say today like "kill all niggers" or "race war now."
At this moment I don't know if you are troll or the most moronic guy here.
evoandproud.blogspot.com.es
This blog is not trying to deny anything, stupid moron, you don't even read it. This blog tries to explain to idiots like you what is the Lewontin's fallacy, because it's pretty obvious that you don't even know what it is.
Now I understand why your people need affirmative action, Jesus Christ.
Climate change is a lie created by the Chinese.
The climate change probably is not a lie, but the policies against it are hurting more western countries like America than China.
