Why Don't We Nuke ISIS Controlled Cities?

ITT.

Other urls found in this thread:

uk.news.yahoo.com/iraq-80-percent-ramadi-ruins-fighting-135111110--spt.html
liveleak.com/view?i=01e_1467465977
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Why would we bomb what we invest in?

Maybe the rest of you americunts can read this and stop asking why we can't do shit about the cartels.

Fuck off Mexico. When we legalize weed the cartels will implode and the wall will already have been built.

They will simply focus on all the shit you keep illegal.
Jamal has to pay for those sneakers somehow.

The political fallout would be worse than the actual fallout and both would be worse than ISIS.

I think the way to defeat ISIS is to start treating them like an actual country. Recognize their borders, open up embassies in their territory, start trading with them.

Treat them like a child. Force them to take on some responsibilities and see how it changes them.

If it doesn't work, declare war. These people were kept in line by people like Assad and Saddam. They respect power. Let's give them what they want and see how they handle trade negotiations with Russia and China. How they survive when they're dependent on legal trade and they're hit with economic sanctions for human rights violations.

ISIS is a 7th century death cult, they can't survive in the modern world.

Hell, why not sell them a nuke? Some ancient, obsolete piece of shit we threw together in the 60's that costs us a hundred million dollars a year just to keep it from spewing radiation all over the place. That would be funny.

Are you fucking retarded?

>because "muh civilian centers"

The solution, of course, is to start out with warning nukes. First, you nuke the desert, where nobody lives. This will cause the mud-people to think that the end times are upon them, and they will be excited by the prospect of ascending to Djannah.

Then, you nuke the ISIS training camps. This will scare the mud people into submission when they realize that they have no way of training jihadis and most of their young soldiers are dead.

If the mud people don't surrender by then, you may nuke small civilian centers such as Dabiq.

Eventually, the mud people will surrender, if imperialist Nippon is any indication.

>b-b-but what about muh radiation??

There are pills for that. Invest in iodine and sell it to the innocent mud people.

We only back one cartel.

Before you nuke them, you have to poor oigs blood and bacon over the city.

That way they don't get their 70 9 year old virgins

>treating them like an actual country
Stopped reading, they're barbaric savages there is no civilization with ISIS

why would we nuke a bunch of CIA assets?

lmao do you have a disability or something, Enrique? Did you learn this from your major of Feminist Dance Therapy?

ISIS areas have like 0.1% of the oil

its basically all in the Shia and Kurdish areas in Iraq and Syria has almost no oil

Iraq oil production has actually increased by like 40% since summer 2014 when ISIS started making front page headlines and is consistently setting all time record highs (for Iraq)

i don't think we should nuke Raqqa and Mosul because of massive international backlash, but it would be great if the Russians did it

they are being nuked but slowly

uk.news.yahoo.com/iraq-80-percent-ramadi-ruins-fighting-135111110--spt.html

Did you skip the part where I said if they fuck up at all declare war on them?

If any other country acted like those fucking psychopaths they'd be overrun by NATO troops in half an hour. If a Jordanian agent shot up a gay nightclub in Orlando, Jordan would be Israeli clay before CNN broke the news of the shooting.

Let's hold them to that standard and see how they do. Except the part about giving Israel more clay but that's a whole different battle.

Because they're legitimate businessmen who just happen to be at odds with global communist central plan of control

Because the innocent people who are enslaved by the ISIS will die too.

Because that's all you need when you also bribe all the retarded politicians.

Obviously it's not since there's still more than one cartel and Mexico is shittier than the CIA wants it to be.

>If you kill your enemies they win: The post

You ain't foolin me you fuckin leaf

Because you're cucked by Jews who want you to die of (((Islam)))

>Use nukes near civilian centres
>Implying that won't just create a massive spike in homeland security

Why are you so FUCKING dumb cunt?

>Nuke a city
>Fallout spreads
>Other world powers have a right go at America
>Eternally cucked for being the only country to ever use nukes in our progressive world

>complaint about ISIS
>they have conquered people

>solution to problem
>kill the people they have conquered

>conquered
sure thing Ahmed

...

You know they work just with one how?
All the fast and furious and than nigger that spilled the beans fiasco stated they gave them all weapons.

and a dot in the middle, outa fucking nowhere

because in every shithole there's somebodies worth a damn

you can't just solve the problems a few hundred/thousand of people are creating by killing thousands of good people in the process. fuck japan though, they needed to be nuked twice.

The apocalypse will start. 1 billion people will suddenly want to attack the west more than they already do

raqqa is where they are held up and the majority of the population are just civilians who have no affiliation with isis. nuking raqqa would be a foreign relations nightmare and would piss off every moslem nation in the mid east

CONFIRMED LEAF WITH PROXY

No one is this dumb

Why would you? Isis can live without those cities anyway.

The guy saying recognize them as a state isnt wrong. Once they have defined borders and international statehood, they're contained. If they invade, they get hit with a nuke, same as any other country.

Or even just declare war on them immediately after recognition. That works too.

What if they just make all drugs legal. Wouldn't that get rid of the cartels.

That would also destroy their monopoly on drugs.
The Americans are simply protecting their market until they have complete control over production and distribution so that they don't need the cartels anymore.

This is why they have military bases in Afghanistan growing nothing but poppy. The time draws nearer.

>nuking tel aviv

>mexinigger blaming other people for his savage tendencies again

All this shitposting surely has bored you to death! How about giving Jamal a call and purchasing some high quality dope to spice up the night?
It's CIA sponsored so you know it's good!

literally retarded, statehood wont make them stop doing what they do now OR justify a nuke
they already say they're a state and dont care about recognition

you cant use nukes anyway; nowdays they're a deterence to stop other countries with nukes

So you're saying that we should treat them differently than other states? Why? Because they're muslims?

Because the Queen lives in London.

because they're not a state, dumb fuck
legitimizing them does nothing but increase their appeal, we are ALREADY BASICALLY AT WAR, i dont see how acknowledging them suddenly changes the wests approach to dealing with them

Use of nukes is literally never justified, normalizing the use of nukes would be the end of humanity
[spoiler]Mecca should still be nuked for the lulz[/spoiler]

You really need to make posts this funny early in the thread. It just isn't the same 50 posts in.

but but... what about the sex worker trafficing and the secret recipe to pace picante sauce?

How are they not a state? They exercise total control over a large portion of what idiots like you pretend is still Iraq and Syria.

Read my post. Acknowledging them as a legitimate country forces them to accept certain responsibilities. If they don't do that they can be wiped out all according to the western world's totally arbitrary views on what constitutes morally justified military action.

If they don't want to die, they'll change.

Why dont we nuke US cities??

Other people in the world also have nuclear weapons and might take issue with the fact that we are dropping nukes in areas where radioactive material could be blown into their countries.

That's the thing about nuclear weapons. They are scary as fuck but they also pretty much ensure there will never be another world war. No one wants to take that step. If commie boots ever landed on US and it looked like we were going down they wouldn't hesitate to drop the hammer and vice versa. War from now on is basically going to be chasing dirt farming brown people through mountains forever.

this user's idea might have limited use in places like Detroit where niggers abound. and as a point of info, some legitimate people think micro-nukes were use underground by (((jews))) on 9-11 since jet fuel could not have brought down the blgs.

Because "muh mudshit civilians."

>How are they not a state?
they aren't recognized as one, they're a terrorist group with large land holdings
this point will be buried under a mountain of semantics
>Acknowledging them as a legitimate country forces them to accept certain responsibilities
no it doesnt
acknowledging their statehood does not force them to do anything
what the fuck led you to believe this
>If they don't do that they can be wiped out
yeah, just like that time we nuked north korea for not doing what the west said
oh wait
thats not how it works

>ITT : blue pilled goyim

>ISIS is a 7th century death cult, they can't survive in the modern world.
Same as Islam though. It can't be reformed because it's "perfect", even though the world has since moved on centuries ago.

>Hell, why not sell them a nuke? Some ancient, obsolete piece of shit we threw together in the 60's that costs us a hundred million dollars a year just to keep it from spewing radiation all over the place. That would be funny.
Pakistan has some. Who knows, maybe they even lost one somehow.

>first point
They're not a state because they're not recognized as one? The US was a terrorist group with large land holdings until 1789, your point is invalid.
>second point
Yes, it does.
>third point.
We haven't wiped out NK for 2 reasons. 1, they're a Chinese puppet state and the buffer they provide between SK and the PRC is valuable to the PRC; and 2, nobody, especially SK, wants to deal with reintegration.

I think that any religion can, theoretically, be exploited by the right person to do evil. The thing about Islam is that it makes it so easy to make a death cult out of it a child could do it.

The bible can, in theory, be interpreted in very violent ways, but in practice, only Islam provides an ideological framework so ripe for exploitation by psychopaths.

>The US was a terrorist group
yes, WAS, until it gained international recognition
did this suddenly stop the US from doing fucked up shit, by the way?
the answer is no, because your magical rules that appear from nowhere are a joke

>Yes, it does.
why? explain to me how saying "you're a state now" suddenly force you to abide by standards that apparantly just appear out of nowhere? explain to me exactly why you think this stupid idea is true because it fucking isnt and you're a dumb cunt
>We haven't wiped out NK
correct, because the west cant just WIPE OUT NATIONS that dont abide by its standards

daily reminder that this is what ISIS does to the Yazidi and there's literally no reason not to murder every single one of them

liveleak.com/view?i=01e_1467465977

i've never seen anything quite like this video and it's not even the professional torture porn they make

Because there are inocent people trapped there

If I was a Yazidi girl getting the shit raped out of her by arabs I'd pray for the sweet release of nuclear hellfire.

>Because there are inocent people trapped there

There are no innocent mudslimes.

>If I was a Yazidi girl

They are Arabs, you twat.