Can dumb athletes solve this

can dumb athletes solve this

3 = OP is a fag.

Wow senpai good job

Sup Forums isn't gonna do your homework Tyler fuck off

9

9

Am i athlete?

its 6 retards

is this purposely meant to trick us by skipping 4?

3 x 2

I understand the Serb but I'm really disappointed in you Germany.

6

>tfw my immediate instinct was 12
I am so fucking stupid

it was a trick because it skipped 4

12?

9*8 = 72
8*7 = 56
7*6 = 42
6*5 = 30
5*4 = 20
3*3 = 9

Gj german bro
Its hard to explain to brainless burgers

12


Jesus christ guys

>implying its not a series
proofs

Just woke up hung over af, it's 6 you fucking retards

A literal (((trick)))

-16
-14
-12
-10
-8

Therefore 12

>every number is multiplied by the one below it
>except for 3 for some reason

Uhhh what? How is 3 not multiplied by 2?

9*8
8*7
7*6
6*5
5*4
4*3
3*2
2*1
1*0

ummmm sweetie
9*8
8*7
7*6
6*5
5*4
3*2
It's a pattern - integer x multiplied by x-1

>implying missing 4 has something with random autistic math task

In what world does 3 not equal 3?
This board is full of retards

3 = 6

What in the fuck are you even talking about

see

>calls them brainless burgers
>his brain literally is a burger

are all murrilards IQ 89 brainlets?

Alright, I fucked up.
Admit it too serbro.

...

Guys my IQ is confirmed 145 and I swear to God stop lying to these people

72-56=16
56-42=14
42-30=12
30-20=10
20-X=(continued pattern)
Aka 20-8=12

The numbers to the left is like C++, you declare that 9 = 72, which just means they're the same thing. Might as well be A = 72.

problem with these things are, if you have no further information, all of these can be considered correct because all are logical coherent.

You base the correct answer only on what was on the guys mind when he created that test.

But 5=20, so it's 5×4, 4×3, 3×2
It's literally a pattern

I guess we'll never know for sure...

what he meant by this.

They are all untrue and the last one is 3.

See
Also pattern with 1 less step than you took to achieve your "pattern"

but this and a frequent one in these tests. Row of numbers get multiplied by x. with x chaning in a certain pattern.
There is no way you could dismiss this answer as logically incorrect.

Germany, for the solutions resulting in 6 and 9, would you agree they both take one more step than 12? Wouldn't logic imply you use the one with the least steps away from the pattern?

It would be
9*8
8*7
7*6
6*5
5*4
4*3
3*2

They skipped the 4 to confuse you. The anwser is 6

easy pattern

9 x 8 = 72
8 x 7 = 56
7 x 6 = 42
6 x 5 = 30
5 x 4 = 20
4 x 3 = 12
3 x 2 = 6
2 x 1 = 2
1 x 1 = 1

I'm sorry but what sport is this?

You fucked up the end. It would be 1*0=0

yeah I know, accident

There is nothing to admit, whenever burger tell you something,its always opposite.

Well considering the right hand side to be a dividable progressive series by two, you'd get a collective difference of:

72/2 -> 36
56/2 -> 28
42/2 -> 21
30/2 -> 15
20/2 -> 10

And then you find that the progression is a incremental reach from the prior difference:
36-28 = 8
28-21 = 7
21-15 = 6
15-10 = 5

So therefore the final value has to be 4, meaning that the difference is 10 - x = 4

X solves as 6.
So that would mean 3 is multiplied by 2.

the thing that bugs me with the 12 answer is, that it doesnt have a connectin to the numbers to the left, so they are irrelevant which would be strange for a test like this.

I dont know mayne, Im going back to bed.

>making things up that aren't in the task's description
>arguing that "they skipped" the made up information to confuse the reader

Yeah 4=12 and
3=6
Under that logic

why did you divide by two i dont understand

>he doesnt understand simple patterns with more than enough sample size
Ur dum

not sports

The numbers to the left are names and the middle numbers are the values of those names. Replace the numbers on the left with letters and you'll see what I'm talking about.

It's similar to coding language.

4 is not part of the pattern at all. You are adding things to justify your wrong idea.

Anyone who says a number other than 6 are Downies in need of spoonfeeding.

Think of it like this.

A = 72
B = 56
C = 42
D = 30
E = 20
F = 12

The numbers on the left are declared equal to the numbers on the right, therefore they are simply the name(left) of the value(right).

the virgins 9 and 12 and the Chad 6

>he can't see patterns in the given sample so he has to make up stuff until the task matches the solution he expected

Brainlets get the fuck out!

Yes but 3 would = G

G = 6 in that pattern

>he needs spoonfeeding

No. The left is not a numerical pattern. They are the names of the values to the right. 3 is a name, not a number. 4 does not exist. There are no values in that picture named 4.

'G' would equal 6, but the picture doesnt provide what it would be named. The break in the pattern is to let you know that they are names and not numbers.

>working with what you've got is spoonfeeding
>meanwhile making up additional assumptions to be able to solve a simple task is considered superior math skills in leafland

Pray to whatever gods you don't cross my path on /sci/, babbybrainlet.

>3 is a name, not a number.

Umm sweetie, im a full fledged mathlete. Show me your math license or your opinion is immedietly invalidated.

Consider learning a programming language.

>Consider learning a programming language.

>Show me your math license
>math license

okay, okay! You're a funny guy. I refrain from making fun of you brainlet any longer.

Wrong, you stupid faggot kraut. It's clearly a series which means it wants you to account for the missing 4 and therefore the N times N-1 sequence so it's 3*2 = 6.

t. 80 IQ

I'm not h*ckin' joking around, Hans. License now or forever leave this thread.

If you're in Stem and don't know at least 1 or 2 basic programming languages like Python or C sharp, you are doing something very wrong and are far behind compared to everyone else.
t. Electrical engineer B.A who knows physics, math, stats, and even biology majors who take lots of CS courses and have their own portfolios with their programming projects.

>If you're in Stem and don't know at least 1 or 2 basic programming languages like Python or C sharp, you are doing something very wrong and are far behind compared to everyone else.
t. Electrical engineer B.A who knows physics, math, stats, and even biology majors who take lots of CS courses and have their own portfolios with their programming projects.

Still don't know what a "math license" is supposed to be but whatever.

>C#

Get the fuck out, windowsbabby. Now!

3 = you're a cuckold

>he doesn't even KNOW what a math license is

Your credentials are shot and will get no further response from me, casual

06

>cucknadian education

9=9*8
8=8*7
7=7*6
6=6*5
5=5*4
3= 3*3 = 9
This was the easiest shit ever