What the fuck is this shit?

What the fuck is this shit?

Other urls found in this thread:

nationalreview.com/article/445206/jordan-peeles-get-out-trite-get-whitey-movie
rottentomatoes.com/top/bestofrt/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_with_a_100%_rating_on_Rotten_Tomatoes
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

If you don't like this movie you're racist.

You don't want to be racist, do you?

critics giving them a fresh review otherwise they are racist

welcome to modern america!

Stream?

Let me take a wild guess

Is the timely, clever and relevant social critique this film presents with such clarity and intellect "fuck white people"?

The Triggering Is Real

Maybe it got an 100% because it is good? I don't know though, I try not to judge movies before I watch them

The flaw Rotten Tomatoes is that when you have a 100%, it's really 100% of the critics reviewing it giving the movie a "positive" review. That doesn't mean that they all think that it was the greatest movie of all time, it's just that they all think it surpassed some lesser threshold of goodness.

american remake of an actual good movie

That is true. I saw the movie today and it's a very entertaining movie, it's good. But the 100% led me to believe it might be some kind of masterpiece, my expectations were way too high.

It's a solid horror thriller with a few funny parts and is a lot more straightforward than I expected. The race relations stuff ends up being not that central to the film.

Despite the way it's been marketed the movie is satire and the satire is not "LOL FUCK ALL WHITE PEOPLE" but is making fun of white liberals who are overly eager to get some cool points from the blacks.

Reee black movie rate high REEEEEEEEEEEE

casual negroid worship.

100% means 1. none of the critics thought it was shit and 2. armond hasn't reviewed it yet

wait, are you telling me the punchline of this movie is cultural appropriation?

The movie is the result of niggers being triggered that white people exist. Millions of dollars and months of work vs. a few shitposts on Sup Forums, and guess which one flusters your fanny?

What are you even talking about? You sound schizophrenic dude. Shouldn't you be muttering this while you push a cart down the street

This is the first non-documentary film with over 100 reviews to get a perfect score in eighteen years. Think of all the critically-acclaimed films that have come out in that time. All of them had at least a couple negative reviews.

Sure it's possible that every single critic that reviewed it thought it was just above-average, but with how incredibly rare this is, you would be expecting a masterpiece.

If you don't watch this movie while a black guy fucks your gf beside you you're a nazi.
Nazis get punched.

This user is correct. Armond has reviewed it and his review is negative but it just hasn't been posted to RT yet. Tomorrow this will read 99%.

>implying the kids from Sup Forums have girlfriends

Allow me to explain OP

What? Horseshit. I'm sure that's not true, and not even all the reviews could be in yet. right?

paternalistic racism is good racism

nationalreview.com/article/445206/jordan-peeles-get-out-trite-get-whitey-movie

THE MADMAN DID IT AGAIN. FUCKING RIP

He's made his entire career out of being the only guy who hates good movies. No one would even know who he was otherwise. His reviews are boring as fuck.

It's not true

Plenty of 100s on RT

However, they are currently ranking Get Out as the 56th greatest movie of all time

rottentomatoes.com/top/bestofrt/

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_with_a_100%_rating_on_Rotten_Tomatoes

Only the second ever to do it besides Toy Story 2. Now it looks like based Armond is going to knock it out of 100% territory, but it's still a pretty historic achievement.

>with over 100 reviews

tyronhe is not buying that shit tho

triggered niggered

There's also the matter of how recently the film was released. It determines how many critics will review the film. Get Out (2017) receives 131 reviews, but Frankenstein (1931) only gets 45. They're both at 100%, and Frankenstein is probably the better movie, but because Frankenstein is older and critics don't care to review older movies en masse, there's a skew toward newer movies.

Are you seriously gonna sit here and tell me I'm wrong? Did you read that review?
>no one will

>rottentomatoes.com/top/bestofrt/
damn, and I thought IMDB 250 top films were a piece of utter garbage

>Key & Peele LOL

This happened because of people in their 20's.

I will say this, though.

Finding Nemo is at 62, with 99%. Is Get Out really better than Finding Nemo? I mean I haven't seen Get Out but Finding Nemo is a goddamn classic.

Nigger makes movie about (((whites))) sucking up to him

(((whites))) end up sucking up to him irl

you are still a triggered niggered

>100%
>WERE DEFINITELY NOT SHILLING GUYS ITS REALLY THAT GOOD AND IF YOU DONT THINK SO TOO YOURE A NAZI BTW

This is the same reason Marvel gets such high scores. I don't believe "critics" anymore than I believed the election poll (((projections))).

Lots of black and interracial movies get terrible reviews. The reason this one got good reviews is that it's a solid entertaining movie with good actors and a good script.

Just saw the movie. It's stupid.

tits are not the same as testicles, you realize that don't you, you lil bitch?

I agree with you on the shilling stuff tho

Damn this movie was BTFO by that post!

It's just more anti-white than the rest of them.

Is it? The white people turn out to be voodoo cult members. Do you think the movie is suggesting that all white people are voodoo cult members? Or is it just unacceptable to ever portray any white people as voodoo cult members, lest it offend your delicate sensibilities?

>Am I the only conservative that didn't miss the point of the movie. I went into it having read the above review, with very low expectations. This movie for all it's flaws is an assault on colorblind liberal elitism. The white liberals in the movie turn the black character into a commodity, are dis-genuine, and generally patronizing (sound familiar). In the end they care nothing about him and just want his body (or vote). As a white person I wasn't offended, or even in tune with the white people in this movie. This film mocks a very specific sub group of people that I share very little in common with.. Huh I think the reviewer is just kind of out touch with satire.

>give negative review
>get called a racist
>lose job and get death threats
>fresh: 131 rotten: 0

In the culture we live in, is it really worth the risk?

>Armond has reviewed it and his review is negative
yo fuck that house nigga, his review shouldnt count. crabs in a bucket man

It's just a funny pic bro take a breath.

f-fuck off tumblr! w-we aren't just as bad as you I swear!

Armond praised Man of Steel. Fuck him

It was THE movie of the century. It exposes the true nature of white people: they are envious of the superior culture and genetics of black people. The only """people""" who hate this movie are Sup Forumstards white males who are afraid that they've been found out.

Trying too hard user.

Can you find me any film on Rotten Tomatoes about an evil voodoo cult without the racial slant that's rated at 100%?

so is it worth seeing?

Dude, this act was fresh back when Django came out. We all know what we're going to get now.

Tyrone looks like he ain't having any of that shit

I enjoyed it but the 100% on RT had my expectations set too high. It's an entertaining horror/thriller.

Fuck off retard. Nobody ever criticized liberal zealots of screeching, they criticized what they were screeching about.

Please do the world a favor and kill yourself already

What the fuck are you on about? It's not a remake of anything.

Why do Sup Forums care so much?

Can he save us?

Cause that black dude in the trailer has a hot girlfriend and they don't have a hot girlfriend in their trailer.

>anonymous shitposts on Sup Forums
vs.
>millions of dollars and months of work

Yeah his review is negative, it just hasn't been posted to RT yet.

It was definitely not a bad movie, but it doesn't deserve a 100%. Just finished watching it. It felt just a cut above made for TV movie. Solid, but not a masterpiece. Acting was good though. Story throws sort of a twist but nothing revolutionary.

Why would the most paranoid board care about their conspiracy theories getting proven true?

The critic reviews for this movie are absurd, no sane person can argue against the obvious narrative and agenda being pushed.

But, they can, because it's a good movie, and lots of other black/interracially themed movies have gotten terrible reviews. So your premise makes zero fucking sense.

>da fuk am I spozed tuh do wit flowaz? I got Kidz n shieeet...

That's the weakness of RT. If a movie is just good, but it's liked by pretty much everyone, like a solid B or even a C+, it gets a really high % score. There's the rating out of 10 but I don't really understand how it's calculated and no one pays any attention to it.

This picture never gets old

I haven't watched it so I won't say it's good or bad, but if you have watched it, do you really think it is worthy of a 100% rating?

A literal perfect movie?

Its not going to stay that way, as already pointed out reviews from Armond always count towards the tomatometer and he thought it was race baiting bullshit. Thats not to say it is, just to say why the fuck do you people care about a number on a fucking website selling shitty ads to you. I get reading film crit because some people have interesting interpretations, but why does it matter if get out has 100 or 60 percent. Are you going to base your own enjoyment off of what a bunch of autistic white people think? Oh wait of course you all are because this is Sup Forums and you dont know how to get validation anywhere else.

>scene in the trailer where the main black guy offers another one a fist bump and the other one shakes his hand
>Voice over: "There's something very wrong with this town"
You're retarded if you couldn't see this is satirical

Lmao seek help

I think it's a good movie with broad appeal which translates into a high score on RT. I liked it. I didn't think it was amazing. My expectations were way too high. It's a well-done horror thriller with some funny parts and a couple of good twists.

What the fuck happened in 2012? I don't get it.

>Trailer looks interesting
>Looks like a decent thriller flick, I'll give it a watch
>Maybe they'll be some decent threads on Sup Forums afterwards
>Reviews come out
>Overwhelming positive to a ridiculous degree
>Sup Forums has to be contrarian no matter what
>No discussion will ever be allowed without someone bringing up BLM or some SJW bullshit

Whoever made the movie cared way the fuck more than anyone on Sup Forums, though. Why are you on the Sup Forums board caring about the fact that other people are posting things you don't like?

I'm not aware of another "black" movie that has come out after the media went full anti-white anti-trump.

Sorry user, you live in a post Trump world and leftists and liberals are going to continue to ruin everything with virtue signaling like these reviews.

IT'S
FUCKING
S A T I R E
A
T
I
R
E

Yeah, no. It's just a good movie that the reviewers liked. Your bubble of paranoia where everything revolves around your simpleton red-team-vs-blue-team politics doesn't have anything to do with it.

>movies and the people making them are overtly politcal
>get triggered that people react to the politics of movies and the people making them instead of just passively accepting them

I read it and much like the moonlight review I thought it interesting. Armond has a unique position to comment on race and sexual identity. His dissenting opinions usually come out of his own conservative religious upbringing. This doesn't make his opinion wrong, it makes it interesting. Pauline Kael famously hated beloved movies too because of her perspective. If you really care what over 100 white people had to say more than another black man, then are you really that better than the fucking white people in the movie. The irony is smacking me in the face with its dick

That's clearly what things revolve around for Hollywood though. Celebrities can't go a single award ceremony without throwing several fits about Trump.

Sucks. Same thing happened to 12 Years a Slave. Great movie that Sup Forums is eternally butthurt at.

the last dying gasps of the entertainment industry's imagination.

Couple of non-political thoughts on this movie:

Allison Williams is a cute. Her girl next door was perfect and I think we'll see her in other things.

Daniel Kaluuya did a flawless American accent. I was wondering if he could pull that off after seeing him in Black Mirror with the thick London accent, and after Benedict Cumbersnatch fucked it all up in Doctor Strange.

Peele is not in the movie which is good, it would have been distracting.

Really? 12 Years a Slave didn't seem to get much Sup Forums attention as I recall. Certainly nothing on the level of what Django or Birth of a Nation did.

Quentin Tarantino isn't just a cuck, hes a cucklord. The guys almost militant in his push for cuck porn.

y-yeah user

>all white people are secretly racist
>all white people are unintentionally racist and they don't know it!
>cops don't help blacks!
>black people are "forced" to hide their true personality around white people because of the mentioned secret racism.

It's LITERALLY the equivalent of MTV race baiting videos you stupid fucks

If you can't see the OBVIOUS agenda in the movie you're stupid as fuck and should never fucking come back.

Hmm yes surely a racial movie staring a black man just happened to be the best movie ever, in the climate where the media is pushing the narrative that white people are all racist KKK neo-nazis.

I go on here and other boards to be exposed to other things I havent heard of because Sup Forums is actually one of the best places to not experience fucking echochambers that web 2.0 has created everywhere else on the internet. Thats why I think its sad that you all want to turn it into another one without substantively discussing dissenting viewpoints. It's a well made film, no question, and it's likely coming from a personal place close to Jordan Peele's heart, and I felt that in the movie. But much like moonlight with its weird lack of sensuality, I found parts of this to be too contrived to really suck me in at points. At the same time, I do think there's value in making films that portray black people in weak, scared, presentations, but automatically praising something because its black or gay is insulting to both. Like really, dude was so hung up over one handjob he was never ever doing anything ever again. Yeah, thats a real person.

that's fucking hilarious dude

The agenda of the movie was to call out virtue signaling liberals for how they approach blacks.

If the people in the movie were actually racist they wouldn't bother trying to "use" the main character like they did. And the cops weren't helping because they were on the antagonists payroll, not because they were cops.

nigger

Yeah if you read the reviews they don't say it was "the best movie ever" they just say it was good. The only time I see the narrative of white people being racist neo-nazis is when I read Sup Forums and comments sections infested by kids from Sup Forums who are in fact racist neo-nazis. But it's cute how you blame it all on some media conspiracy. We both know damn well what the truth is.

>has not seen the movie

>implying tyronhe would take care of his kids

Daniel did a good job. His acting was top notch. His character was written really well and he executed it perfectly.

Through the entire movie I was saying "that's how I would have reacted desu to a similar situation."

Dude, the other guy is right. It's not actually what you think.