Is my head severely fucked by nostalgia or does 2003 look the most photo realistic ?

Is my head severely fucked by nostalgia or does 2003 look the most photo realistic ?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Bnh2AplyKi4
youtube.com/watch?v=YbgPt9hkrC0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Third one does. 2003 has plastic hair and ps2 skin.

2003 looks the most human, but the least realistic.

Goku was a better Hulk than the Hulk will ever be.

2003 hulk doesn't even look angry

fist one looked like putty with no definition
you are blind

Your head is severely fucked.

Ruffalo Hulk looks the most photorealistic.

...

I don't know about most photo realistic but it has the best design for sure.

in fact he looks chill as fuck

2003 Hulk is the best Hulk. Literally too patrician for Marvel babbies high on quips.

something about the skin just looks very real i think

How did they make him look so real?

If the models were supposed to resemble the actor portraying Banner, then yes your head is fucked because Ruffalo's looks the most photo-realistic

Wasn't that pretty much the point of the movie?

>gritty gravel skin means it looks more real

no

They all look terrible. I'm sorry. Only good CGI monster is Balrog.

2011 version is still the best

>humans don't have porous skin

Are DCuckd this retarded?

It's a real actor and not a bunch of damn numbers in a computer!

tbqh, this. none of those look photorealistic.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Is that Richard Spencer ?

Why is 2008 Hulk so handsome? He looks like a green zac efron.

dumb frogposter

the chaddest hulk of them all

I think I'd have to see a photo of the hulk to be sure.

Thank Norton and his fuckhuge ego

The director wanted him to look like the perfect human, like an idealised statue or golden age bodybuilder.

I prefer it to the green Rufallo ape, honestly. Also the CGI for 2003 Hulk is pretty incredible for its age.

2003 is so fake it actually looks like a model from a time before CGI existed

Because he was played by Edward Norton.

I really like the built-fat Ruffalo ape Hulk

He looks nothing like Edward Norton though. If anything you'd want the Hulk to look uglier than yourself. I'm not buying it.
this makes sense

Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: the comic book: the movie

>incredible for its time
Fix'd

>rebooting shitty character 3 times in a decade
like batman

Super male vitality

Why would you even hire Norton, anyway? Given his reputation.

Everything about 2008 Hulk is cheap as fuck. Just compare these poor ass sets to the massive scope of Lee's Hulk.

ang lee hulk was a shitty movie that took too long, had terrible cgi and a mess of a story
hulk looked fake, wrong color green, the retarded he grows bigger when he gets angry. dad becoming absorbing man out of nowhere

Norton hulk while not doing much impressive stuff in the strenght department looked and behaved far better and more like hulk should be.

ruffolo hulk gets used in short bursts and looks pretty good

I like 2008 the most but he is too handsome to be Hulk.

Because despite his diva reputation, he's an Oscar winning actor

This is the marvel cocksucker that ruined the franchise.

They all look like shit.

They really fucked up with the second one.
The other two resemble their own Banner, you can recognize them, but that other one looks fucking nothing like Norton.

Honestly for 2003 that's really impressive work. It doesn't hold up well to more recent cgi but given that it's 14 years old it's quite good. But avengers hulk is most photorealistic

>photo realistic

Also 2012 clearly looks most "real" or maybe it's just the darker lightning

Add some color grading and it'd look just as realistic

2003 looks like a ps3 game.

Stop.

>Sup Forums - Television & Film
even the tie in PS2 game HULK looked better then the movie 2003 version

Honestly the 2003 one looks like a real human being would look like, the second one is a joke, the third one is classic overhyped detailed shit, but humans see fake when something is too detailed. More impressionism is better, it's the same in painting, Hans Holbein the Younger painted in like single beard hairs but his painting look like uncanny wanna be humans

2012 Hulk is the only one to get laid tho.

wtf I hate Eric Bana now

The comparison is relevant, considering the graphics are computer generated.

i'll give you this
avengers>2003>norton

the 2003 looks more like evo morales than what you picture by "hulk" but it looked amazing for those days.
2008 looked like an action figure, awful and i was very dissapointed when that movie came out.
I loved avengers hulk when that movie came out, and i still do love that design. It's nearly perfect blend of photorealism and "fucked up face" that would belong to such monster.

2008 has shrek teeth

>tfw i actually like the 2003 Hulk

2012 is the most realistic, 2003 works fine because it's more stylised. 2008 sucks dick.

ruffalo hulk really undersells how draining the transformation should be. It would be better if he came out looking like pre-steroids rogers

same question but towards rdj instead.

Hulk would be better if norton was allowed his way

That factory attack scene tho

>not in chronological order

you dun goofed

holy shit that awful fucking taste

2003 hulk actually got their relationship right

youtube.com/watch?v=Bnh2AplyKi4

Why leave out the newest iteration?

CG Artist here. 2003 has the best artist, 2012 has the best technology.

they should combine the two.

you ruined the 2003 version. congrats

before the 10's is when people knew how to adapt comic book movies.
spider-man, blade, hulk, even iron-man in 2008

I wish that anal obliteration gif of him and Scarlett Johansson existed as high res webm.

2003 was the worst movie I've ever seen

Mr Hyde wasn't a monster just a jerk

Hyde was in fact a monstrous manifestation of mild-mannered Dr. Jekyll

Kek

I wish it existed in the actual movie.

*path blocked*

Looks like Mark Silvestri's Hulk.

No he wasn't read a book some time, Jekell was a repressed wanker, Hyde did all the shit Jekell wanted to but was to much of a puritanical pussy to actually do, Hyde was an asshole and occasional murderer he wasn't a monster

>that scene in the 2003 movie where Hulk is running and jumping in the desert
>he lands on sand and falls down
Was mildly amusing.
Some other scenes like the murder recall were pretty spooky for the young me.
2003 Hulk was quite kino.

>it was as if she and the knife...merged
It was pretty great, also had a much better explanation why Ross doesn't trust hulk

>murderer
>not a monster

>tfw you sell drugs to the community.

Well the guy he killed was a stuck up wanker

That doesn't excuse it, dude

No still not an actual monster unless...maybe the monster is really inside all of us?

Perhaps, nah that would be silly

Yea fair point

>2003
user....I...

>Implying.

2003 Hulk canonically got the pussy first.

youtube.com/watch?v=YbgPt9hkrC0

Uncanny Valley; the more real the less convinced you are.

wtf is this shit? go back

i feel like it's kinda embarrassing to have your face morphed like that

My Debrinha.

they all look like giant green men who don't exist therefore are all fake

Kys plebeian

I see it too, I think it's the lighting and that he looks like a big muscular man that was painted green, like the TV show, instead of a giant muscular man who is green, like the recent films
Also marvel films all look the same, very plain and sterile, while ang's film is separate and has its own look and style to it with no hang ups about needing to looks similar to other films tied to it.

dubs and a lul. Not bad. Not bad.

Why did they make his face look like a gorilla? Why does everything grow except his nose? He has by far the smallest nose from all of the other hulks. It looks fucking weird and I cannot not notice it anymore.

kek 2003

2012 by a mile.