Serious fucking question:
Is someone here a time traveler?
Serious fucking question:
Other urls found in this thread:
vnnforum.com
text.returntothepit.com
en.wikipedia.org
spottedrooster.blogspot.com
lmgtfy.com
daisythecurlycat.blogspot.com
youtube.com
las.org.sg
youtube.com
twitter.com
What's up with that??
His name is John Titor.
You'll cowards don't even travel time
WE WAS TIME TRAVELLERZ N SHIT
WE
Not yet, but I will be.
BACK TUDAH FYOUCHUHHHHHHH
John Titor was black
i love when weird shit like this pops up, i'm sure it's not a time traveler or anything crazy but still it's funny that someone was googling "we wuz kings" back in march 2006
...
Those are the legit black people who googled "we wuz kings"
Yes, but I can only go forward.
>Maybe it's not that far off, since an African warlord will declare himself the monarch of an "empire" than encompasses a full 1.7 acres of corrugated metal shanties
African kings BTFO'd
Probably this OP, memetics at its finest
damn. ngrh8r was was like 10 years ahead of his time. possibly the originator of "we wuz kangs n sheeit"
Found this too, from nov 2007:
text.returntothepit.com
>MACS ARE LIKE NIGGERS
>LOOK COOL BUT THEY DON'T WORK
>IT'S OKAY BROTHA, WE WUZ KINGS AND WILL BE AGAIN
>MOST MAC USERS ARE GAY THOUGH
>ARE YOU ON THE DOWNLOW?
>BLACK POWER!
Apparently the meme originated around that year, it just laid dormant for nearly a decade until Kek willed it alive.
Time is a flat circle
Another serious question: do your mobile phone or notebook contain any information that could be useful to the people in the past, except for porn?
For example, information considered top secret tier in WWII?
It was completely unironic usage
how underage are you, or anyone in this thread?
Black Israelites have been shouting they waz kangs since the 90s. Really shows the age of Sup Forums
All circles are flat.
the hornace of time travel
Yeah I'm from 1983 It took me 32 years to get here
Rememes
2006 BC
Oh snap, 1888:
en.wikipedia.org
spottedrooster.blogspot.com
>“‘The Contrack only lasted till such time
as we was Kings; and Kings we have been
these months past,’ says Dravot, weighing
his crown in his hand. ‘You go get a wife
too, Peachey—a nice, strappin’, plump girl
that’ll keep you warm in the winter. They’re
prettier than English girls, and we can take
the pick of ’em. Boil ’em once or twice in
hot water, and they’ll come as fair as chicken
and ham.’
I think so
>banned
>2016 in the search
>still blips in 2006
what the fuck.
get /x/ in on this.
Circles have constant positive curvature - they're not flat.
You're talking about lines not 2d objects.
Circles are flat.
Okay, it looks like it's just shitty programming on Google's part; everything gets a weird bump 10 years ago; that bump there is July 2006.
circles arent 2D you shill
Hes quoting NAS - I know i can third verse
There's nothing spooky about it.
Check out these articles.
This guy has and the whole Black Hebrew community started the We Wuz movement back in the 90s
What has been memed can never be unmemed.
...or maybe not.
What the fuck Google. Why are there spikes for this search in March 2007
Tell that to Dali.
The only thing that weirded me out was the "2016" part, but as says, it's probably just shit programming.
If you click on those links, they're misleading. They refer to articles from 2001 or so, but with recent Brexit news in the sides.
Trump was considering a presidential run in 2007. I remember him being on the Michael Savage show around then or 2008.
I don't need to explain anything to someone on acid, they understand the universe more than I do.
Oh. The explanation for that one is right there under the term; it's not a specific search term, but a topic, so it collates a bunch of data and synthesizes a result.
its the hornace
I think Google is deliberately trying to make it hard to find older articles and news.
No matter what you search you're only going to see current propaganda pieces.
I deliberately searched for old articles with the keyword ''brexit'' and it shows nothing but propaganda pieces from 2016.
That's me in the left.
>Leave 51.9% Remain 48.1%
>feb 1 2001
SPOOKY
Search for praise kek
I just looked up where the ''we wuz'' searches come from.
It looks like may be related to orks. This one has ''we wuz'' written on it.
ITT: Sup Forums doesn't understand memetics
>[scared]
>be from berenstein universe
>all these memes happened 10 years ago for us
>except they weren't effective at the time
>jump to berenstain universe
>a few traces of our past memery make the jump also
>lots of things are different here but this timeline is still salvageable
>and nobody here has seen this shit yet
>rapid-fire post 10-year-old memes in berenstain universe and hope it works this time
>you faggots have no idea
>you have no idea what's about to happen here if it doesn't work this time
Um.
PRAISE KEK
kek at adolf bumping a 9 year old thread
>Australian education
Was gonna say, things are getting a bit spooky.
memes are cyclical, just like history. we are really re-memeing ancestral memes.
Also found this creepy fucking batshit insane blog about cats.
It also has ''we wuz'' as some sort of an attempt at trying to sound cute.
daisythecurlycat.blogspot.com
>Hi Daisy doo - maybe dat is a special designed smooching spot and is designed especially for kisses. I can't believe you would ever be messy.
>Happy new year to you and miss pixie bananas. I hopes you keeps us laughing for another year, and that all dem pretty shelter kitties get loving furrever homes.
What the fuck?
youtube.com
las.org.sg
>May God’s peace and comfort be with you in your loss but we praise Him that Kek Hwa is free and well.
>banned
Remember that these are search trends, so unless somebody copied that line and pasted it into google, it wouldn't show up.
>how bout that, what a coincidence
wow Louis going right for the racism, based.
wasn't me sadly
huh.
Y'all need scepticism, yo.
For reference, it looks like the 2007 spike was caused by the rise of a different rebel chan in 2007.
I am trying to find what they were looking for and I get nothing. It's really spooky.
What gets me is how severe the spikes are, and how there's no "noise" around them.
The ads are new, the page is old.
I'm too stoned to explain it. Just think about it man.
>that fucking video
thanks user, I needed that.
This nigger did it
this nigger
UM
UM
The system is rigged!
In march 2006 i was a senior in high school
It was me lads
Surprised one of you fucks didn't beat me to the punch desu
>webcrawler crawls all pages periodically
>the sidebar 'related stories' update
>webcrawler picks those up
Accordingly only 100 searches of 'we wuz kings' have ever been made.
Fuckin euros
I get that people were searching for Trump, but Hillary? What the fuck?
Wtf is with the regularity of that signal? Legit scared right now
You do realize she was the leading candidate in 2008?
triangle... 3 points... 3 numbers... trips... oh my god
i needed a moment to figure it out, but the numbers aren't absolute searches.
100 is the year/month most searched and the others are just percentages
Why do I get different results?
>that massive lead in search volume
i have always wondered, what are the differences between the chans?
we've had the magic brewing for a long time now. it's only starting to really bubble over now. just wait, things are about to get extremely lulzy around November
quotes vs No quotes, friendo.
quotes reduce some of the noise; you're probably getting searches like "stage magic meme"
super-cress, user
Time travel aren't real.
Imagine if we have time travelling, we can create a singular point of Missing Technologies.
e.g.
person travelling from 2100 to 2000 and teach them technologies of 2100, and advances from there.
the new 2100 time travel and brings new 2100 technologies to 2000 and teach them then advances from there.
Rinse and repeat.
someone from 2100 will come back and teach 2000 the highest point of technologies man can achieve, hence pushing human to the absolute highest point merely in 2000.
And it applies to any other alien "lifeform".
So it's easy to deduce time travelling is impossible.
At least in this universe.
because the first user used quotes to only find exact searches. less noise in the results
LUL
I'd say there's two basic kinds of altchan.
1) the 7ch/8ch style, which tries to actively subvert and take over Sup Forums's place in english imageboard culture. None of these have succeeded so far, though both of the examples mentioned carved out a niche and milked it for years.
2) "special interest" chans that offer an experience/focus Sup Forums doesn't want to. 420ch is for pot-smoking dopes. furch was for raging homosexuals and RPers. fapch was for jerking off. etc, etc. These don't try to subvert Sup Forums, but the lack of subversion and "us vs them" attitude makes it hard for them to survive, unfortunately.
...
fuck off troll.