Why is it that so many millennials complain about the government having too much power...

Why is it that so many millennials complain about the government having too much power, but they don't support libertarianism?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=COItiKtHWyg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Because they're stupid enough to believe they'll be the ones with the power.

I am a millenial and a registered libertarian.
#FeelTheJohnson

Same

Kind of like how libertarians are stupid enough to believe they'll be rich one day too if they only pull themselves up by their bootstraps enough

>Thinks the government should enforce bathroom usage
>Thinks Christian bakers should be forced to bake gay wedding cakes
>Gun control VP
>Agrees with "73%" of Bernie Sanders' beliefs
Wow what a great libertarian I guess I'm a #fairyforgary now

Because theyre too dumb to realize that theres other political parties/views other than Democrat and Republican. Its an endless cycle of ignorance that continues to feed our two-party system.

It's not about being rich, it's about living comfortably, peacefully, and free.

Lots of millennials are libertarian, most are socialist tho because why wouldn't they want free shit? They never think what happens to places like Greece or Venuzuela.

why is it older people complain about millennials not doing enough when I just got back from a 12 hour shift going on hour 94 so far and 1 more day left of work just so I can afford my ridiculous $1200 apartment monthly rent.

go fuck yourself

>Libertarian
>Post Gary "MAKE THE CAKE" Johnson.

youtube.com/watch?v=COItiKtHWyg

I support libertarianism after a society without people that ruin a libertarian society has been achieved

Where you live for that place?

Who cares about this hypothetical? I just want a guy who won't waste our money on bullshit like the failed war on drugs or on arming Syrian/Libyan jihadists. He's not an anarchist either, he aggressively went after polluters in new Mexico.

Most millennials are literally democrats

Anyone that claims to be a libertarian should care about that hypothetical. It is him arguing for big government. That is not libertarian.

The only chance the libertarians had was Austin Petersen.

>trey parker
>libertarian
>became a famous influential millionaire through hard work
Try harder n00b

wow... you are right! I was going to vote for Hillary
but now I'm a #Shill4Jill

I agree, but he is better than the other options we have

10 years ago
>WTF WAR MONGERING REPUBLICANS
>FUCKING WARHAWKS
>AMERICAN EMPIRE
>AMERICAN IMPERIALISM WTFFF

Idk fuckin 6 hours ago or something
>Obama
>uh
>The world, uh... needs american leadership, and uh...
>liberal burgers clap madly

No, he's not. Your choices are literally

MEANY FACE GUY

LADY THAT MURDERS PEOPLE AND SELLS INFO TO FOREIGN INTERESTS

GUY WHO WANTS TO JAIL YOU OVER CAKE

As well as, Johnson has absolutely no charisma. Austin Petersen was your best option and you retards voted for cake man.

i didn't vote for cake man. I am just saying that I'd take Johnson over Hillary and Trump and Stein

>Gary "Wonderful public servant" Johnson is a libertarian
>The Libertarian party isn't run by a bunch of Bob Barr nominating cucks


>mfw

They support social libertarianism because it's in their interests

They don't support fiscal libertarianism because they tend to have less money and smaller incomes than older voters, and thus have more of a self-interest in income redistribution, especially in the short-term, which is what most voters are concerned about.

Close to a billionaire. Works like 3 months a year....

The LP decided to nominate Johnson. I think if it was decided by a public votes Petersen would've won because we all know libertarians love "muh ideological purity" and Austin takes a big steamy shit all over Gary there.