What if schools start teaching kids English differently in such a way that made them interpret the constitution...

What if schools start teaching kids English differently in such a way that made them interpret the constitution differently? What if they made them interpret it in such a way that gave the state more right to power and in such a way that gave the citizens less rights? And would a state run school have any incentive to do such a thing?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=1YLlX61o8fg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

they have to teach different vocabulary, they can't because all the old dictionaries are on record, plus, at all times there will be people alive with the old language, and they wont allow it

pls kill yourself because you are retarded and your question is easily top 5 stupidest thing ive seen on Sup Forums

What if you taught them more than just english, so they're not limited to what their english media tells them.

Actually on second thought scratch that, non-english people might end up with similarly ruined news sources.

They would kill the old people and burn the old books before attempting such a thing of course. This would be planned out.

>sharing 99.9% of my genes with this halfwit

I want out

What if they didn't have to use English to do this?

Already do this.

Why even teach the language differently if they are just going to kill all dissenters and burn all evidence?

Plz don't breed, fampai.

Already happening. As a kid, I was taught fighting back when somebody was kicking your ass was not self defense. According to them, self defense was crossing your arms.

Literally, the dude made this arm crossing motion as he explained and the older kid that sucker punched me got in less trouble than I did for returning the favor.

Many schools now have a policy that if you are attacked and fight back in any way, you automatically get in deeper shit than the one who attacked you, because you didn't somehow get away and scream "I NEED AN ADULT".

What if I impregnate a Vulcan woman?

That's why I made this thread, because it is already happening.

It would have to be a slow process, because the government would have to already have the power to kill old people and to burn the books, which is pointless because the objective is to expand state power.

That is why my inquiry in this thread, which will not involve name calling, will be predictions about how such a thing can be done.

im 24 and it was pretty much 'if you fought you got suspended' because the teachers didn't want to deal with sorting out who did what.

now that's a great pepe

Is this a white thing? No seriously. I'm Hispanic and the teachers just looked the other way for fights then both students got in trouble. Which was usually suspension for a week. It wasn't a ghetto school but was around 90% Hispanic.

>what if words had different meanings
The Thread

I'm thinking so, I went to school in an extremely liberal area, also 24.

Standard punishment was a week suspension for whomever was the aggressor, two weeks for the person who fought back in any way.

That's what I fear.

Not only about the constitution, but in general.

They are already doing it with that the word "gender".

What will be the impact of subtle and drawn out changes in semantics on how people interpret the constitution?

Anyone familiar with 1984 would fear this.

Hoosierfag here, I can honestly say that is not the norm here. Fights got broken up, but the kid that started it got in way more shit.

I was suspended multiple times in school for defending my self. Turns out if you actually beat the shit out of a bully the school sides with the bully because reasons.

Gender is a fucking stupid concept. There are two sexes, and three sexualities. Straight, gay and bi.

Fuck this identifying as a race and sex that arent your own bullshit.

And dont even get me started on this new breed of gender fluid faggettes and she-twinks.

That's fucked up.
Makes sense.
That's immensely fucked up.

fucking kek. this

What a ridiculous idea. sage

Already happening, of course. Take phrases like "global climate change" "Undocumented worker" "reverse racism/sexism." "Neo-colonialism"

All newspeak designed to manipulate opinion.

When I was in school you got a "red card"
Which was basically a way of measuring how shitty of a kid you're being. 2 gets you suspended, 3 gets you a meeting with a judge or something to determine if you need remedial school.

I kicked the shit out of this bully who'd been harassing me for like 2 years at that point. Got one, so did he, my dad didn't give a shit and told me that if he ever fucked with me again to do it again and he'd fight the suspension with the school board.

This is already happening. The Second Amendment is consistently explained in such a way as to tie it to a formal militia and not private ownership.

>What if

You mean "When".

What the fuck

This has been happening for a long ass time. Check out CS Lewis' The Abolition of Man. It's the exact thing you speak of.

Those are good examples of how the left uses semantics to their advantage. And look at all the people who even on Sup Forums think it is a ridiculous and outrageous idea. Sad isn't it?

Well regulated today means that an industry or good is controlled by a state body that oversees that its fit for consumption, sale or some other oversight that monitors and controls it.

The additives allowed in commercial food products are well regulated by the FDA

Well regulated used to mean something was in proper working order.

The watermill is exceedingly well regulated due to the professional ministrations of the local wheelwright.

T

Good contribution there.

Anybody honest who has a good grasp of the English language will tell you that the presence of the word militia is completely meaningless in the 2nd Amendment.

Dude, what if Obama is using chemtrails to modify the water florination to make Americans vote Democratic.

There would be no evidence for that, whereas what I am talking about does have evidence to back it up. About half of the people here are calling me an idiot, the other half is bringing information and examples to the inquiry. Which of those two is the actual idiot? Which of them is not and argument?

You're paranoid and your tinfoil hat is on too tight.
Everyone should ignore conspiracy theorists like this poster.

[spoiler]I'm shitposting. Of COURSE this is happening, and happening intentionally.[/spoiler]

Not burn the books

upload the books to digital format

and then when nobody's looking, edit them a little ;)

Hello sir, we are going door to door confiscating books to save the trees and the rain forests, in return we will give you all your books back in digital format.

Think that would work? I think it won't work on this generation, but the new ipad generation, it's going to be no problem.

>tfw I invented common core math in 1st grade

You didn't.

youtube.com/watch?v=1YLlX61o8fg

...

Uh, and i reported this ;)

Hope you get a warning for the false report.

Woah... even my crappy burger education never showed me how to do arithmetic with cubes.

Tell me how will you enjoy your ban, bro?

I'm not going to get a ban because I have not broken any rules.

This is not politics related

OP was certainly high on something when he made this thread
99% sure

They don't want political discussions on /x/, they actually want the political discussions on the proper board, which is Sup Forums.

I'm just tired, I clarified my points throughout the thread.

This is not political in any way. It's just another conspiratard thread by muh 2nd ammendment faggots

>NLP isn't politics

fuck off attention whoring tripfag. you dont decide what Sup Forums is

That implies they have kids read the Constitution to begin with. They don't. They give them a summary over ten minutes. The kids then begin to goof off in class for the rest of the hour and go home to listen to rap music and Twitter. Ask any millennial if he has ever read the Constitution and you'll get "for school" but none ever actually had.

That you believe public schools actually have kids read to begin with implies you were a private school cuck.

It's not a conspiracy, it's an inquiry. And what is the subject of the inquiry? It is as such; I was asking if it was possible for semantics to be changed in a subtle and drawn out way with the goal of changing how people interpret the constitution without having to change the constitution itself. People said it would not be possible in the short term, which is why I say now that it would have to be long and drawn out, and some other kind anons left some examples of what I am talking about which they know about. Now what category does this fit in? Politics, or a ghost story. Politics or creepypasta.

This inquiry is in the category of politics. I would be banned if I posted it on /x/. I posted it on the relevant board. What you are doing is a false report. Furthermore it shows that you do not put up with dissenting opinions, you would much rather get the mods in here to clean up ideas that offend you. You are a baby.

>sI would be banned if I posted it on /x/.

And hopefully here too

Hopefully you have already gotten enough warnings from reporting everyone you disagree with that you will get banned this time.

Can we all agree the schools have a civil rights obsession? Seriously. They portray Dr King as a saint to be worshipped for years on end so students turn liberal as a way to continue his dream and be better than the racist generations of the past. Destroy the legacy, destroy the left.

This is why the left clings to MLK so hard. No one has balls to call out what he really was. By milking his image for all it's worth the left can have victory after victory.

never had such a warning bro.

You must be a real professional at reporting dissenting opinions then. I'm trembling.

A militia is by definition composed of private citizens. If they are organized under the State than it's a Military.

And that starts from a very early grade.

hes a tripfag
you dont fucking respond to tripfags
you FILTER tripfags
they are basically redditors

That's a great idea. It's done.

How many US adults actually read the constitution?

Jesus dude, he's just derailing your thread. You must be onto something he doesn't like. Stop falling for it. Stay on your point.

I filtered him already

>You must be onto something he doesn't like.

They already do that by not teaching kids different sentence structures like that used in the Second Amendment as well as the etymology of words like "regulated" and how it applies in historical context.

You know too much, user. Better get out of town for a few days.

Don't be a kunt.

History reappropriation is already a thing, and the definition of rape has pretty much been changed at this point.

what do you mean by that? explain pls

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now." - James B. Comey, FBI Director

Related video that I really recommend listening to when you get the chance:
youtube.com/watch?v=HMi072Ae_0w

{

emotional rape
stare rape
dream rape
rape shaming

...

hello fellow anons, it is I, the original poster of this thread. pardon me for a moment while I go out into the garage where my power rack is and push out a few reps on the good old bench press. I don't think I will need my safety pins this time because I am already strong enough to lift above 315 pounds on the bench press, so there is virtually no chance of dropping the bar like is so common with this dangerous exercise. Okay fellow anons, be right back. Oh, and forget about this thread, I am just feeling a little paranoid today, and there is nothing to worry about.

>they can't because all the old dictionaries are on record, plus, at all times there will be people alive with the old language, and they wont allow it
While I agree OP's premise is a bit silly, you are forgetting that liberals had no trouble redefining 'racism', 'sexism', 'bigot', etc.

Oh it's silly is it? Okay, next time I will put out a perfect statement of fact instead of an inquiry, and no one will criticize me idea so that I can refine it. They will say "I agree" or "I disagree" and there will be no think tank and no alteration of the original post.