How come CGI from 2001/2002 looks better than today?
How come CGI from 2001/2002 looks better than today?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
It's not CGI, it's a CGI wearing a suit.
That sure as shit doesn't
It looks like fucking shit bro
>15 years later
>improvements
CGI from 2014 looks like its from 2001
>board games
kek this movie is a nostalgia trip
The alien is clearly better
that Alien looks amazing compared to OP's pic
im getting baited but the water in the flood scene in BvS was CGI. that is pretty good desu
I saw that piece of shit yesterday, I think I dislike it so much is because you can see D.H. Famalamadingdong wanted to do better but he couldn't or maybe he went oh fuck it that's good enough.
...
It doesn't?
>BvS
some of the worst CGI I've ever seen in a blockbuster film
Looks amazing
Fuck you The Mummy 1999 has some of the best CGI ever
youtube.com
Lol
Looks like Dwayne Johnson
looks real
amazing
FUCKING TERRIFYING
Once again Ridley proves he is a better director at showing Aliens on screen than Cameron was
is this from a video game?
yea i don't liked it either. I just talk about that single scene when he saves peoples from roofs, while everything is flooded. that was pretty good CGI imho. not the fucking video game bossfight at the end man
Why the fuck did he think that hiding out in a catapult was a good idea anyway?
...
I think it has something to do with uncanny valley, old CGI looked like something fantastic taken out of a fantasy book and brought to life, new CGI pretend so hard to be real that it looks weird.
>old CGI looked like something fantastic taken out of a fantasy book and brought to life
So that's how you're going to try and justify it looking bad?
Yes, when you try too hard to make it look "real" or "human" they look actually worse, because brain can not identify them as something imaginary or something real.