Why do mods/janitors constantly delete threads regarding sexuality? More often than not...

Why do mods/janitors constantly delete threads regarding sexuality? More often than not, these threads contain well-written, informative posts on promiscuity (and sometimes pornography). Additionally, they lean towards discussing the role of Cultural Marxism and Second Wave Feminism in the cultural revolution & sexual liberation of the 1960s, while also discussing current sociopolitical movements regarding sexuality.

Since when is discussing basic (modern & relevant) history, contemporary sociopolitics and dumping red pills not "Sup Forums related?"

Especially when we have constant "Sup Forums BTFO," "Does this trigger Sup Forums?" "Hmm, really makes you think," and "How can white men even compete?" types of threads, which stay up (while sexuality ones get pruned), despite being offtopic, shitty b8 threads.

Because neo-Sup Forums should only be about making, black crime and responding to interracial porn and other assorted bait.
Actual discussion? lmao my dude

wtf i hate mods now

Too much like rk9

Fuck off pedo.

Had a good thread on sexual promiscuity, and the sexual liberation (including the flawed science used to justify it, and the (((groups))) that funded it) the other night.

Came back the next day to find I was on a vacation from Sup Forums, for being off-topic.

Some other anons thread just got pruned despite a plethora of b8 threads up.

I could see if these were spammy, unconstructive, or just shit up the board, but they tend to be pretty constructive.

I don't get it.

Because women have done no wrong. It's men's fault.

I am now a #CruzMissle

because your sexual frustration and hatred of women have little to do with global politics.

Really makes you masturbate ...

mods have their own agenda it seems why cant one actual pol user become a mod

I make sure that the mods know about ANY post or thread with a photo that is of a nude nature.

There are other boards you people can post nude content on, but not here. Are you sure your thread did not have any porn-related photos or .webms in it?

Why, Canada? Is it because men let women be sluts and whores and opened pandora's box of female degeneracy?

The mods and janitors are paid to not delete b8 and shill threads

wtf i hate mods now

Yes, cultural Marxism has nothing to do with global politics. Nor does the (((Rockefeller Foundation))) funding flawed research to justify a sociopolitical movement. Promiscuity's effect on marriage, birth and single motherhood rates? Nope, there's no political discussion to be had there at all!

The one that was just pruned just had a clothed qt if I remember right. I used a risqué stock photo of two people (in Bras and boxers) on top of one another to get the theme across. Nothing nude or pornographic, though.

Probably because you retards sperg out when anyone disagrees with you.
Try being civil and maybe your threads won't get deleted.
When threads are %90 flamebait %5 rage and %5 content they get deleted.

Oh, and please go back to Plebbit. We see through your ruse.

I would understand if that were the case, but it's not.

Sexuality threads tend to have fairly decent amounts of discussion. Never mind the fact that, as I mentioned before, some other user's thread was pruned while blatant bait threads are still up.

It's called Sup Forums

Not /fag/

>Kneejerks at the word "sexuality" without reading the post

American education.

But it is unfortunately.
It always devolves into ad hominem bullshit.
But I think we need a few general threads on this topic seeing as shit like is becoming more common.
We had a group hiring on our college campus trying to get students to do exactly that. Pol is more influential than it thinks.

mods are pieces of shit here, nothing new

Oh, I'm not denying the existence of ad-hom bullshit, or shitposting, that's inescapable. I'm just saying that getting two or three proper discussion chains going is decent enough, to not be deleted. Certainly not when it's clearly relevant to Sup Forums.

>Sup Forums is more influential than it thinks

I agree completely, which is why generals on this (and other topics) are necessary. Sup Forums sexuality generals, I think, have the potential to provide at least some form of "third way" between Cultural Marxist, Feminist degeneracy and MGTOW.

Not him but I made a thread some minutes ago using this image asking ibporn was immoral and it's implications on traditional marriage. It got deleted and I was warned. Sup Forums is fucking hit anyway. There are other websites better suited for the discussion of society and politics. Sup Forums is not about freedom of speech.

I remember you. I disagree with your premise that men opting out is ruining society.

I am willing to back this idea.
I can help mediate the conversation/ counter these emo fags that just scream how bad women are all the time. (i'm not saying they are wrong, I'm saying they ruin threads)

SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, what will you do while you are banned?

I don't necessarily believe that "men opting out are ruining society," I just see that being another harmful symptom, rather than a feasible solution.

What a complete and utter joke. Just checked and 2 of the bait threads that were up at the time of your posting that are still up.

Thanks mods, you're our greatest ally.

Apparently do the same thing that I do when I'm not banned; bite my tongue.

Sup Forums always has been and always will be a disgusting cesspool. The people that run this site can do whatever they want.

Porn is indeed degeneracy, and I hate it with every fiber of my being. It has poisoned the public sphere, and give women numerous, immense opportunities to be sluts and whores. Like I said in another thread, the males that are involved in porn should be arrested.

Good for you. Your ban will be probably only 3 days, so it's no big deal. Good luck ;)

I specifically remember someone, I'm sure it was you, casually saying in one of your threads that men opting out are literally ruining society.

I'm almost certain it was you. "You" are a lot more lenient on MGTOW than the traditionalist/femanon shills here.

I wouldn't go that far, but I agree that it is immoral as hell. I first had contact with porn when I was 12 or so, and until I was 17 I was fucking addicted. Then I started realizing it's immoral and bad for health and haven't watched ever since. I wonder how it is to be 100% person. I will never know what it is to have the boobs of my wife the first tits I ever see, instead of a random 19 year old whore. Or how I would think of sex if I never watched porn, etc.

What I'm trying I say is that children should absolutely be forbidden, deprived of contact with porn, just as they are with drugs or should be with junk food, etc

The men that are involved in the production of porn are utter scum. They are giving sluts and whores countless opportunities to broadcast their degeneracy.

What bothers me more than anything is how people on the Internet insist to me that western society is "prude". I wonder how autistic someone has to be to actually believe that. We are the most sexually degenerate civilization to ever exist in human history.

You know, usually people screenshot when they report threads, I'd appreciate the same courtesy. Granted, a /metapol/ thread is still more Sup Forums related than the plethora of b8 threads I'm assuming you have no problem with, Tripfriend.

It might've been me; I'm certainly not big on MGTOW and would prefer a more traditionalist sociopolitical movement to counter postmodern standards, but I don't recall putting all of the blame on them.

Oh, in the sexuality thread the other day, I had a Dutch poster trying to claim that America was "sexually repressed" and "prude," because of the country's reaction to the Janet Jackson fiasco.

Reality tends not to matter, they'll cherrypick and use flawed metrics to prove this supposed "prudishness."

I'm not big on MGTOW either, I just understand why they exist. They do not deserve the bitter hatred they receive. I also prefer a traditionalist solution to the current situation, but it was so disappointing when I realized that even the most extreme traditionalists these days are stupid fags that see no problem with female promiscuity, and they blame men for everything. It was very demoralizing to see that.

This board needs to become a blue board.

Otherwise serious discussion of these topics is impossible with shills/addicts posting porn

I get why they exist, I just dislike the fact that some of them consider themselves to be a solution.

The unfortunate reality of most traditionalists is that they're too quick to blame their own group for societal failings (ie, other men). I agree that men aren't blameless, but women have to take their share of responsibility. There's also a chunk of them, and you'll see this whenever the topic is brought up on Sup Forums, that believe you have to "mold the ideal woman." That line of thinking denies women of their own agency and absolves them of all guilt. It also fundamentally ignores that redeemed whores are still whores.

Porn is against the rules..Cuck post somewhere else

You assume wrong bro. I usually report those threads too.

it's only "softly" against the rules because the kike mods ensured that this board would continue to be a Red board, which serves no purpose other than promoting the idea that porn is OK here.

As much as I dislike 8ch for other reasons, their Sup Forums being blue is the best aspect of it

>Implying I posted porn
>Implying I didn't explicitly say later on in the thread you didn't read, that I didn't post porn.
>Implying I haven't indirectly complained about cuck porn posting being accepted, but legitimate discussion not.

>tripfag
>bro

I do agree that even the clothed pic you posted is a bit provocative, and your threads would be more effective without it. Otherwise you'll just get banwagoners turning it into a "hot '''''traditional''''' girl " thread

It's a multi-faceted situation.

I do wholeheartedly believe that men allowed women to be sluts and whores in the first place, and every single day, we provide women with the opportunities to be degenerate scum.

At the same time, I as a man refuse to take responsibility for your average slut out there. It's not my fault. All men are not responsible for women being sluts and whores. Men gave women agency, but a lot of time has passed, and women have had their own agency for a long time now. They have an even greater standing in western society than men do, so this "take responsibility, be a man" thing is not totally accurate.

MGTOW is not a solution, but I cannot blame the innocent men these days for losing all hope. It's a fucking terrible situation.

I prefer to try and start threads with relevant pictures (granted, a thread on sexuality is going to involve some provocative image or another); unfortunately, starting off with qts gets more attention than a compilation of charts, or picture of an obscure but relevant figure.

That's pretty much where I stand on things. I get why MGTOW have given up, but there really needs to be another cultural force to challenge the narrative put forward by feminists, Dr. Kinsey & Cultural Marxists.