What's a war in your country that would make a cool movie?

What's a war in your country that would make a cool movie?

War of 1812 here

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-4Mtg-FJCuQ
korrespondent.net/ukraine/3891071-sozdateliam-novorossyytv-daly-deviat-let-tuirmy
youtube.com/watch?v=VL7XS_8qgXM
twitter.com/AnonBabble

All of them.

>not King Philip's War
>not French and Indian War

None.
We've only had 3
French people surrendering is blase, Irish butthurt is blase, and Americans are really insecure about 1812.

No it fucking wouldn't

fuck off Nigel

the one where we don't surrender

Which one is that????? :DDDD

that's why we make no war movies :DDD

The one where we're the good guys.

why would you want a film about a war the americans lost

>Americans are really insecure about 1812

Did you read the OP?

That's every Vietnam movie

WWI alpine front

>Castelletto delle Tofane, Dolomites, first half of 1916
The Austrians are in a strategic position to defend an alpine pass, the Italian army is blocked, impossible to hit the enemy hidden among the steep rocks with many machine guns and cannons, an attack would cost thousands of soldiers and probably fail
The solution? Italians begin digging a 500 meter long tunnel in the rock, pic related, they dig for 6 months, half in winter, under enemy positions they dig a room and fill it with 32 tons of nitroglycerin, 11 july 1916, BOOM! They blow up the entire mountain killing all the Austrians

its been done, but only for Battle of New Orleans

ww2 but somehow every movie is shit
we need a moratorium on ww2 movies to stop the shit coming

Then they would be filming shit about WWI and war with Napoleon

Y*nks couldn't bear to make a film about the 95% of the war they lost

Vimy ridge or hill 70 from the first world war would make for a good movie but the problem is getting a competent studio to actually make it good. Look at passchendaele, that could have been a good movie but the dumbasses making it ruined it.

nigger we won as many battles and fronts as the British did

preventing invasion of Canada, and torching D.C. were the only major accomplishments the British had

>torching the capital of the united states is some sort of meagre achievement

>preventing invasion of Canada, and torching D.C. were the only major accomplishments the British had
>achieving 100% of the war objectives is all they accomplished
Why are Americans so fucking stupid? You tried to invade us and failed miserably. That is entirely a loss for you.

Probably all of them, but I'd rather watch something about the Napoleonic campaign on Haiti and the desertion of Polish regiments, since very few people here know about it.

Lobster war, 60's, against France.

Washington D.C. was nearly undefended

Their war goal was to reconquer america you cunt. Not to prevent a group of rag tag militias from invading a retarded colony.

the president himself led an army against the british and was defeated

>We have met the enemy and they are ours
Wasn't that what you lobsterbacks said after burning the Washington?

NO HE DID FUCKING NOT

John Adams evacuated the city long before you lot got there. He was 4 or 5 miles away when you torched his house, it was a fucking tornado that kicked you lot out of the city, and then he came back.

Nobody gave a damn about D.C. at that point because it had only been the capital for like a decade.

the fourth austro-turkish war

also torching government buildings was barbarian tier in the first place

Most contemporary American observers, including newspapers representing anti-war Federalists, condemned the destruction of the public buildings as needless vandalism.[40] Many of the British public were shocked by the burning of the Capitol and other buildings at Washington; such actions were denounced by most leaders of continental Europe, where capital cities had been repeatedly occupied in the course of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars and always spared destruction (at least on the part of the occupiers - the famous burning of Moscow that occurred less than two years prior had been an act carried out by the defenders).

teach your own country's history instead of believing in a stupid meme, you fucking piece of shit

Yanks sacked civilian buildings at York

>What's a war in your country that would make a cool movie?

youtube.com/watch?v=-4Mtg-FJCuQ

American court found guilty journalists Dmitry Vasilts and Yevgeny Timonin, who were suspected of creating a youtube news channel "Novorossiya TV".

Both were given nine years in prison. This time period takes into account the time spent by them in the pre-trial detention center, where Vasilets and Timonin are from the year 2015.

The verdict was read out in the absence of the defendants. Vasilts was forced by US special forces from the courtroom on the orders of the judge - the defendant began to criticize the court for the decision.

The court clerck literally yelled at the journalists "you has no fucking rights" when canadian special agent started to yell racist remarks and questions at the journalists, who were pushed out of the court "what do you feel when YOU(russians) are without rights"?

korrespondent.net/ukraine/3891071-sozdateliam-novorossyytv-daly-deviat-let-tuirmy

>the war goal was to reconquer america
Is this what you retards learn in school? YOU declared war on US you absolute fucking mong. You tried to invade british canada and failed miserably.

Rofl. The british left private property untouched and only burned public buildings. Welcome to war you whiny bitch.

So? America has always been barbarians larping as a country

A movie about the charge at Somosierra portraying different testimonies of the same events could be fun.

>Some western authors have assumed that Napoleon had gone out of his mind in ordering the Poles to charge batteries of 16 cannon over several kilometers of extremely difficult terrain. Others, however, think Napoleon ordered only the closest battery to be taken, in order to open the way for his infantry, and that Kozietulski had misunderstood the order. No matter – once the charge had begun, and the chevaux-légers found themselves under fire from the second battery, they had no choice but to press the attack, as the horses went to the highest speed and were unable to stop.
>The charge was led by Kozietulski, but he lost his horse after taking the first battery. The squadron was then joined by Lt. Andrzej Niegolewski, who had previously been on reconnaissance with his soldiers. The charge was continued under Dziewanowski, and when he fell from his horse after taking the third battery he was replaced by Piotr Krasiński. The charge that continued to the last battery was led by Niegolewski, who miraculously survived a fierce attack by Spanish troops – he received nine wounds from bayonets and two carbine shots to the head.
>According to many memoirs of veterans of the battle, Kozietulski led his men in a charge with the official cry "Vive l'Empereur". However, popular legend has it that the true battle cry was the Polish "Naprzód psiekrwie, Cesarz patrzy" – "Forward, you sons of dogs, the Emperor is watching"

We declared war on the BRITISH, not some fucking cock sucking colony
Also we declared war because of impressmont of American sailors

Even Napoleon didn't burn government buildings

napoleonic wars desu

>burning government buildings is worse than civilian ones

Truly puzzled by your outlook

If you kill civilians they can be replaced, they're worthless.

Killing government people is just being a cunt.

We never tried to kill King G*eorge

Thats because Napoleon sought to conquer. The british didnt want your shitty country anymore so they lit some fires and went home. Also them/us is for all intents and purposes the same thing given the context.

If you didn't want sailors impressed you shouldn't have been trading with a tyrant and harboured deserters. You chose a side and it was France.

>G*eorge

What did he mean by this

>surrendering

you mean kicking your ass despite being outnumbered?

ur dumb

>If you didn't want sailors impressed you shouldn't have been trading with a tyrant
I agree, trading with the British was a mistake

he was a subhuman br*t

At least I can spell you ugly fucking redcoat

I would love to see a good Crimean War movie.

fuck off foreigner in my country

Charge of the light brigade

War of 1812 in North America was status quo ante bellum

the british wanted that though

Y*nks wanted all of Canada

Bitch Ah'm from Texas. Every yankee in my state can fuck off! Lel
Cheers!

The Crimean war is fascinating. The first photographed war with a futile Calvary charge.

>yfw you Live in a leftwing/socialism country and dont make movies about wars Because if a rigth wing thing and for that is bad.


We have a lot of shit movies about how pinochet is bad and goobunist is good

>declare war with the goal to seize canada
>fail
>b-but it was a t-tie!
Yanks are embarrassing.

Bull shit

Stop falling for Canadian memes.

you imperialist bastards wanted to retake your colony.

>goal to seize Canada
when will this meme end
We didn't even send the regular army, just militias

I don't understand why people act like saying Pinochet is bad makes you a commie.
The cunt killed over 5,000 people. That's pretty fucked up, even if they were commie

>movie

nice copypaste from last year thread mister Sheckelstein. we apreciate your support of greater Israel.

what the fuck does any of this post have to do with the Poles

>5000 commies dead

Yeah, and muh six gorillions from holocaust are real.

Perhaps a film about the Boer wars. If one exists....

Nice memes buddy

The British impressed American sailors before the French Empire even existed you stupid fuck

>the french republic wasn't tyrannical

I hate Napoleon, but you fucks had no right to impress our sailors

>We didn't even send the regular army, just militias
That's even more sad. You signed up for the big league and sent amateurs.

I bet those militias could beat Canada's modern military

>a tyrant
Do you know what "a" means?

>who the fuck do you thinks is on this foto?

WHAT THE FUCK DOES GREATER ISRAEL HAVE TO DO WITH POLAND IN 1810???????????????????

And you had no right to hide British deserters which you did. Also attacking trade vessels is what countries did back then. You asked for independence and obviously werent ready for it.

>And you had no right to hide British deserters
prove it you fucking faggot

all nations had the right to intercept shipping back then during war

Poland pretty much was Israel in 1810
>Pale of settlement

>And you had no right to hide British deserters which you did
Actually yes, we did (and do) have that right. It's called asylum

Bullshit.

To be fair asylum didn't exist until the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in like 1948

thank you for your post Mister Sheckelstein. we apreciate your support of greater Israel!

Canudos War

Asylum was a thing in English common law, meaning that both the UK and US recognized its legitimacy

Triple alliance war.
>Paraguay btfo

>Asylum was a thing in English common law

nope.. that was french and catholic church rule. usa and other eternal anglos started to use it as political warfare only after ww 2

Inaccurate

thank you for your post Mister Sheckelstein. we apreciate your support of greater Israel!

1948 civil war and you can end it with the abolition of the national army.

What.

they should finally make a movie about WW2

That one too.

One that tells the truth would be nice

if by insecure you meant the opposite of that, than yeah.
youtube.com/watch?v=VL7XS_8qgXM