Did they deserve to die?

Did they deserve to die?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XEATiGKOTEs
youtube.com/watch?v=Ljd2MLlkg6g
youtube.com/watch?v=GkX89LWtCPc
youtube.com/watch?v=I5EG8v2zP8s
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakov_Sverdlov
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakov_Yurovsky
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Lenin
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky
youtube.com/watch?v=wELrtx8NxoU
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Absolutely not. He was a good man but maybe unfit to be Tsar.

No, all the Marxists that killed them should be hanged and the Tsar shall come on his horse with his army to Moscow and reclaim Russia.

youtube.com/watch?v=XEATiGKOTEs

all royalty should die.

Depends. The reds took over and they were more as less just as bad.

yes, but you are forgetting the nobility, they should also be exterminated

All liberals should die, 1 King, 1 People, 1 God.
Glory to the Tsar!
youtube.com/watch?v=Ljd2MLlkg6g

Of course not

Unfortunately the bolshevik parasites thought otherwise

You both must be exterminated for the revolution to be fulfilled.

No, they were (((betrayed))). Hitler did nothing wrong.

>Did these children deserve to die because stupid commie peasants wanted to genocide a bunch of people and destroy the world?

He was rasputins cuck, so yes

>subhuman Jewish parasites execute the Romanovs in a dingy basement, exterminating a Royal house and ending its bloodline forever in a night

>proceed to take over and completely destroy Russian society for the next century

Not even one thousand Holocausts can pay back what they did.

Given that a large number of my family members were killed/exiled in the purges that followed I'm going to vote no.

Fuck communism and everything it brings.

Yes. For their crimes against the Russian people.

Monarchism was a cancer against any rule by the people be it Communism, Democracy, Republicanism, Socialism, etc.

Romanov bloodline is still alive today

just not in Russia

Fuck off you worthless pud of semen. Europe started going to shit when we abandoned monarchical contitutions and monarchical rule.

ok edge

What is the difference between Feudalism and Soviet socialism?

>the Okhrana
>starts World War I, resulting in the immediate hundreds of thousands of deaths of his subjects
>bans the sale of vodka, taxation on which was nearly 33% of Imperial revenues
>actually starts a war while simultaneously cutting off a main source of finance
>then takes personal command of the Russian Army, leading to millions of deaths of his subjects
>refused to end the war even as the Russian Army ceased to exist as a fighting force, leading to millions more deaths
>during which time, the understandable anti-war sentiment in Russia was reaching levels where a revolution was seeming likely and then inevitable
>kept sending millions to die
>brought about the end of the Romanov dynasty through sheer stupidity and callousness to the suffering of his subjects
>gifted us all with the nightmare of Soviet Communism

He got what he deserved. The man was a brutal and stupid tyrant, who only seems even slightly sympathetic because he was murdered by the brutal, intelligent tyrants that his brutality and stupidity brought to power.

Fuck Nicholas II.

>all royalty should die.
found the jew

No reds were better, at least Stalin was competent.

kind of. revolution was really inevitable. reforms were slow, and the repressions were becoming increasingly violent. to the point where imperial forces would literally line up all the males of a village and execute every 10th to send a message

Russian Empire wasn't Feudal, it had no serfs.

The literal equivalent of being killed by BLM for white priviledge

Death to you, Jew.

>What is the difference between Feudalism and Soviet socialism?

Mechanization

Right, it was the (((commie peasants))) who wanted to removal the previous ruling class....

>Russian Empire wasn't Feudal

The Russian Empire by the time of Nicholas II wasn't Feudal. My ancestors were "kulaks" as the commies called us at the time.

I'm trying to point out that feudalism and the soviet socialism were not that different in terms of enslaving the people.

No, Nicholas is one of the biggest "JUST" in history
Literally did what the people wanted by popular opinion and got killed for it

He was bourgeoisie scum. Yes he had it coming. Why is it so hard for you monarchist bootlickers to understand?

No... they didn't. Very few people deserve death.
poor Russia.

We will see if "reds" are better when white army purges all filth.

youtube.com/watch?v=GkX89LWtCPc

dubs of truth

His daughter was a qt

RIP

jesus fuck off to Cuba if you want to larp as a commie you retarded faggot

The Tsar and Tsarina were by all accounts some of the most loving and wonderful parents anyone could have ever asked for.

They really fucking loved their kids, and all they wanted was to have a good life and a good future. It's fucking sad.

it was the jews

Nicholas's father (Alexander III), a burly "man's man", practically despised Nicholas and never bothered to teach him the finer points of keeping a huge empire together. When Alexander died relatively young, Nicholas had barely the faintest clue how to rule.

He was fairly sensitive and indecisive. Enter Alexandra, who was a good deal more decisive. Nicholas was hopelessly in love with his wife and did everything she told him to do.

When their child Alexei turned out to be a hemophiliac, the overly-religious Alexandra was all-too ready to believe the lies of manipulative monk Rasputin, who claimed he could stop Alexei's bleeding.

NOW, you had degenerate Rasputin telling Alexandra how to rule, who in turn told Nicky, who in turn did as he was told. In peacetime that would have been disastrous enough, but all this coincided with the outbreak of WWI, which feudalistic Russia was completely unprepared for.

It was the perfect storm against Nicholas. The country all but collapsed under the strain. Although his regime was relatively benign compared to the Bolshevik butchery to come, he helped set the stage by refusing to modernize and allow true democratic institutions to flourish. All people ever knew was the "strong man", and it's all they respected.

tldr: he was incompetent, but not a butcher.

Nah, it was the aristocrats who were cunts. Nicky wasn't so bad

I can't believe that happened almost 100 years ago and the Jews ended up winning.

Yes and no.

He fucked up pretty majorly before and after WW1.

Most probably don't know this but the Bolshevik revolution was supported by Germany as they wanted Russia out of WW1.

Russian POW's that hated the Tsar and had sympathies with socialism/communism were released and sent back to Russia to stir up trouble.

He deserved to be taken out of power. A banishing at best, a public hanging at worst.

But the way they did it, and his family? That was pure barbarism. It was an inhuman act.

He was a shit emperor but he and his family were unjustly murdered, women an children, by the Bolshies. Not even the younglings survived. I have this feeling Russia could have become something really great if 1917 didn't happen, wth new leadership not composed of gommies.
>commie peasants
The bolsheviks were not the common people, they were a bunch of radical intellectuals that sought to force their crazy ideology on the common people.

No, and they wouldn't, hand't Nikolai been such a cuck.

>He deserved to be taken out of power. A banishing at best, a public hanging at worst.
Found the false opposistion Jew.

>me
>Jew

If any other man, or woman, or possibly a small child or dog, had been on the Russian throne, Communism would never have happened and Western civilization wouldn't have gut shot itself in the fields of Flanders.

The deplorable world we live in today is the direct result of the idiocy of Nicholas II.

And even if he didn't personally deserve to die, he lost two wars and directly ordered millions to their deaths. A failed military leader should share the fate of those he sent to die, which is why the honorable ones used to fall on their swords.

...

Kill yourself Jew, you fool no one.

At least commies aren't monarchist cucks

Nicholas was literally the Jeb Bush of Russia

he didn't do anything

>I have this feeling Russia could have become something really great if 1917 didn't happen, with new leadership not composed of gommies.

Agreed when I was taught about the tsar, his family and the revolution in high school it was the saddest part of history for me I wish things could have gone differently.

>Hes mah leader cause muh god chose it

Are you really as stupid as a peasant?

At least Monarchists aren't bolshevik anarchists.

>a "commie" living in the United States calling anybody a cuck

lol

Constitutional Monarchies are the best form of government m8

He was a 4/10 king in a tough time, but that doesn't mean he deserved to die. Never kill your king, kings are the symbol of their country.

>But the way they did it, and his family? That was pure barbarism. It was an inhuman act.

Absolutely. I'm not saying the Soviets were anything less than the worst thing to happen to humanity, ever.

But it was right that he die. That's a man who was pampered in the utmost luxury from birth, while millions of his countrymen went hungry.

And then, he ordered millions of them to their deaths. He was the absolute ruler of Russia, and everything that he did was a blood-soaked failure. Why shouldn't he share the fate of all the soldiers he lead?

That's obviously true. Soviets still had peasant support and basically justified everything as "tsar wouldn't reform fast enough." I guess I should have made the whole judeobolshevism component more obvious, but since OP was asking if they "deserved" it I was assuming he meant over perceived injustices and not just "yes, goy, let's seize the means of production eh eh eh"

God > Man, for the glory of the Tsar and the Russia's all opposition must be killed.

Russia = Tsar, Russia /=/ a brainwashed ever changing thought.

youtube.com/watch?v=I5EG8v2zP8s

no but you are

There is a reason the Orthodox church made him into a Saint.

Russia really is an interesting place. Must be odd or difficult wrestling with such a complex and emotional history.

Only the strong survive bitch

very interesting

Why is Russia such a fucking hard place to rule?
in the span of 100 years its undergone like 3 governmental changes and is still going

Try filthy retarded bolshevik, the peoples army will exterminate Marxism and open the gates to the Tsar.

Agreed. Why the fuck should I be feeding some King and his family? Fuck them. Slaughter them and their children.

Monarchists love cuckolding so much they want their political system to do it to them.

4 - Czar/Provisional Government/Soviets/Democracy

And it's because Russia is really fucking big, and full of different ethnicities and religions who don't get along. The only reason it ever became one country is by force of arms.

>can't believe
Why not? Christian nations worship Jews, believe that the health and success of Jews is key to their own entrance into a theoretical afterlife utopia. Jewish revolutionaries move through that type of environment like a hot knife through butter.

Why the fuck should I be feeding some Bolshevik and his family? Fuck them. Slaughter them and their children.

If Bolsheviks love destruction and money so much we should give them a crown of gold.

> those digits

...

How many here actually realize that it was ethnic Jews who organized and also butchered the Tzar family?

You realize your Protestantism /=/ Christianity?

>2016
>Still buying the the republicanism meme
CMON
M
O
N

>millions of his countrymen went hungry
>he ordered millions of them to their deaths

No one was starving until food shortages during WWI, but it's true that most Russians were peasants living in relative poverty even before war broke out.

It's tempting to think of Nicholas as being indifferent to their plight, but the truth was that he was literally ignorant of it. People like his wife and fellow nobles convinced him that he had a god-given right to rule and that the little people needed a "father"/king or they'd be lost. So he ruled not out of bloodlust, but because he was practically brainwashed from birth to believe a Czarist Russia was best for everyone.

As for WWI, his back was against the wall. His alliances practically forced him into it. And no one had any inkling that WWI would go on as long as it did, so it's not as if the deaths of millions was a foregone conclusion.

None of this excuses his failings, I agree. And he definitely deserved to be overthrown. But to argue that he was genuinely evil is simply wrong. He was a product of his time, but that time was coming to an end--and he lacked the ability to adapt.

yeah instead we should spoon feed a oligarchic elite of Jews (totally not the bourgeois i swear :p) while we all starve to death on the rations they give us proles :D

I piss freedom

>Never kill your king, kings are the symbol of their country.
KEK

You're brainwashed to believe republicanism is best for the people, anti monarchist thought is not allowed.

Did the Tsar have anyone on his families side?

shhhh making the Bolshevism = Judaism connection would make you a bad goy

I'll be back

Filthy Jews, we will destroy you all.

They are? Every country that's killed its king went to shit immediately afterwards.
See: France, Russia, UK, even fucking Brazil

Kill them too.

I don't see the issue here.

>Ordered troops to open fire on starving civilians for protesting a shit war causing lack of resources

Fuck him. His family didn't deserve it, though.

It sure as hell wasn't the workers who the Tsar protected from rootless exploiters.

you can't kill them you dumb goy..lol you took off your imaginary meme chains and now you put on real chains

Kike

Not only by loose bolshevism connection,but the actual people who orchestrated and carried out the killings were ethnic and religious Jews, even though they're a tiny minority in Russia at the time

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakov_Sverdlov
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakov_Yurovsky
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Lenin
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky

I just got fucking mad everytime I remember this.

Before I knew about this I was neutral about Comunism, I even liked it but now I fucking hate that shitty ideology, once I punched a commie face in the street.

Fuck, fuck every single communist.

communism is misunderstood

>communism is misunderstood

no it's pretty well understood by observing 69 years of this bureaucratic mess

Because at least the other Bolshevik feeds you and your children. The King just fucks your wife while you say thank you.

And if you don't like that perhaps your feedback can be incorporated in a democratic process. Good luck doing that with a king. You transgendered faggot.

Vodka niggnoggs being niggnogging.

The Tsar himself _MAYBE_ deserved the death penalty, after due process. He certainly was responsible for a lot of death, so the argument could have been made.

But, the vodka niggers went full Trump and slaughtered the entire family. Because. Chimping vodka niggnoggs only know how to do an niggnogg chimpout.

Never forget: this is a crystal clear example of how Russians, as a subspecies of slav, behave.

They often fool you by having light-colored skin. But you're an idiot to let yourself be deceived. Always know your nigger, no matter the color of its skin.

It wont be understood at all because it will be burned and anyone displaying anything from it will be shot.
youtube.com/watch?v=wELrtx8NxoU

Nicholas Romanov is a good example of why Christianity is so bad for people. He had several opportunities made ready for his escape by the SRs before the Bolsheviks took over custody and he refused because he felt GOD would save them. He got himself and his whole family and servants murderated.

Keep living in fantasy land goy. Ever heard of the samson option? Now shut your anti semitic mouth and learn to get along.

>Why is Russia such a fucking hard place to rule?
- Largest country in the world, lots of isolated areas which are difficult to govern from one central authority.
- Surrounded by potential enemies on all sides, has been subjected to brutal invasions for most of their history.
- Extremely harsh climate. Russia used to and still does suffer from regular food shortages.
- Russia is both European and a category of its own. There's always been a deep cultural divide between the "westernisers" and "slavophiles".
- Was subject to western/Jewish subversion throughout the 20th Century.

>But to argue that he was genuinely evil is simply wrong.

I never said he was evil, just brutal and stupid, unlike his very effective predecessors who were brutal and intelligent.

He bore direct responsibility, through his endless bungling stupidity, for the end of the Russian Empire and the horrible deaths of millions of his subjects -- and through the end of the Russian Empire the rise of Soviet Communism and the deaths of 100 million innocents around the world. I can think of no more disastrous a king or emperor, for world history, than Nicholas II. We're STILL living in the fallout of his failure.

A volley of machine gun bullets is a fair death for a man who caused such bloodshed, suffering, and misery, and who failed so totally.