Is he right or wrong?

Is he right or wrong?

I hope that the Green brothers die.

Who cares. The world has a massive food surplus. Why does he think the human population is so fucking humongous. Even nations that can't feed themselves that should rightfully die out from darwinism are thriving thanks to surplus food supply from the West.

>sell cultural landmark
>probably sell it to be destroyed anyway and/or be sold off into various private collections, piece by piece
>hurr just buy yourself a nice house instead
Is he a standup comedian? Because this line of reasoning is like a shitty satire.
He isn't, is he?
What a world.

Why is the right wing so anti intellectual?

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.

What is the Mecca worth, like 500 billion dollars?
This is great. Sell the Mecca, take a big chunk of that money, build yourself a gorgeous condominium with all the amenities-swimming pool, tennis court...waterslide. And with the rest of it
Feed the fucking world

>Keep throwing money at Africa, the problem will sort itself out after a critical mass of cash has accumulated in some warlord's bank account.

Everyone who thinks like this should be shot, they're part of the problem, intellectually feeble and their genetic material is likely impotent.

>anime wins lol

Wrong.

1) It's their money

2) Gibs me dats to poor countries destroy their local economies

3) The problem of hunger is a distribution problem. Throwing a bunch of money at buying food doesn't do anything to solve the problem of distributing food to people in areas with no roads, no trucks, no freight trains, etc

>Green Brothers
>Intellectuals
Nice quads tho

He's an idiot. Fine, sell it off. The money will disappear in one year, a fraction to feed the poor, the rest swallowed up by kleptocrats. Meanwhile all that priceless art is now in private hands and no longer accessible to the public. Like Jesus said "you'll always have stupid poor people mooching off you"

Wrong. His political analysis is as retarded as his shitty fiction writing.

>let's sell our cultural and historical heritage
>what could possibly go wrong
How about we sell Apple or McDonald and use that money instead?

This too. He's smart on the surface but thinks there's a simple solution to every problem. Virtually all of his analyses are flawed because he approaches everything from an overly moralized worldview.

What is John Green worth, like one million?
That is great. Sell everything that is his, take a big chunk of that money and use the rest to feed the world.

>how does wealth and infrastructure work

he's wrong. people who can't get their shit together deserve to starve

Given the results when Catholics do try to help, it's just the opposite. They should build more nice buildings, pray in them, and then not try to help anything until they're done being retarded.

>sell the vatican
genuine autism is a rare thing to see, and yet Johnny never seems to disappoint

but maybe he's right, maybe we should send a few billion more dollars to Africa, seems to have helped so far

Didn't (((Sarah Silverman))) say that first?

>6-7 billion people in the world
>at least 2-3 billion I'm Africa alone
>thinks we can feed half of them for a single meal with only 500 million.

Lmao did he even think about this before speaking? You couldn't buy these niggers their own McDouble with that cash, much less feed them!

because intellectuals are always, without fail, cancerous faggots that are an active detriment to the countries that they are in

>sell the vatican
>buy food and send it to africa
>african population increases massively becuase they cant think 5 minutes ahead
>more starving africans

great job

You dont fix poverty by "giving". Wealth doesnt come from the money itself but from the ability to produce goods and services.

Why the Vatican why not Taco Bell? Sleazy anti Christians....

sarah silverman said this

Wrong. Catholic Church is already one of the largest providers of charitable aid to the third world.

It's tradition stretches back to the first Pope, St Peter, and as such to God himself.

To turn away from that would be heresy.

>Lmao did he even think about this before speaking?
He's a heretic, so no.

>500 million

Give a man to fish, you feed him for the night.
Teach a man to fish, you feed him for the rest of his life.

Also casual reminder that charity destroys local economies, because they can't compete with free shit. Charity from idiot westerners has destroyed untold thousands of farm jobs in Africa.

The real issue is the distribution problem. It's not as simple as just giving people food. These countries are shitholes where everyone is out for themselves. No one will share. The warlords and leaders take the food and ration it or keep it for themselves or sell it. Poor people can't do anything about it, and if they could they would do the same so it's a total shitshow.

teach a man to fish?

not even jesus had enough to save the poor from their lot?

have he ever read the bible?

>What is the Israeli GDP, like 275 billion dollars? This is great. Give Israel back to the Palestinians, take a big chunk of that money, build yourself a gorgeous internment camp with all the amenities, swimming pool, tennis court... waterslide. And with the rest of it feed the whole fucking world.

protestants have been saying that dumb shit for hundreds of years

fucking retard.
> Sell the vatican
TO WHO DICKHEAD?
WHY DON'T THEY JUST INVEST IN THE FOOKIN FOOD OR FOOD PRODUCERS THEMSELVES?
HOW ARE THEY GOING TO PAY FOR THE NEXT BUNDLE OF JOY

THAT IS IS IS WHAT THE FUCKING ECONOMY IS!

Feeding the third world is apocalyptic insanity. It will multiply the amount of dependent mouths and the suffering in a generation.

Its acting out of humanistic dogma instead of reason.

...

>we have to feed them
>they are incapable of feeding themselves
>literally believing black people are animals

just pull out of africa and let them do whatever.
If they cannot get their shit done without white help, don't act like we have an obligation to help them.

This includes exploiting them btw.

or we could sell Israel to the gulf states

This. You can't save Africa if you keep the Africans. Just look at that documentary, Nation of Dust or whatever it's called. White people and the Chinese came in to help them, built roads, railroads and shit. Everything got ruined because they didn't maintain anything, then they blamed the people who helped them.
The Chinese gave them jobs and wanted to build stuff with them, but they just went "Ey fugg dis chink" and hindered them.

Africans will take the free food and breed until the fixed amount of food can't feed them.

then they are hungry and invade your land and take your own food.

congratulations. you just fed an invasion army that killed you and all your beloved ones. I hope it was worth that moment of feeling like you are a morally superior person.

Fuckin this all day
Bumpavelli

...

you can't just take darwinian theory of evolution and apply it to entire nations you mongoloid.

goddamn. I came to Sup Forums to laugh about dallas blm niggers & shit, instead I found some faggot talking stupid shit about biology he doesn't understand.

He is right. Nearly all religious institutions are corrupt and simply exert their influence to control the masses and use them as leverage to get favorable laws and policies implemented in the government.

Religion links to emotion which is basically grabbing people by the balls and asking them 'nicely' to comply or they will become niggers in the afterlife.

I have extreme disdain for clergymen who interfere with the original message of God. We don't need a salesman in between. If you want to discover God, find him yourself through scriptures.

>ust pull out of africa and let them do whatever.

Have you looked at the population estimates for the next 50 years... Africans are breeding faster than rabbits... there will be wars, plagues, and and starvation in Africa.

Why doesnt whoever has the capital to purchase the vatican just donate the money to feed everyone?

The quads. KEK BE PRAISED.

By "feed the world" I assume he means Africa, and I ask, what's the point? The British, French and Dutch went over and tried to give them civilisation but they can't even figure out simple things like not destroying their railways, they can't go 5 minutes without killing each other.

Now the Chinese are going to figure out how hopeless they are. You give them food and they'll just burn in hopes to cure aids or some other equally as stupid thing.

>500 billion dollars
>feeding the entire world

Maybe for a week if you're fucking stingy.

>nigs need mo gibs
no

Perhaps these so-called "intellectuals" need to fucking understand that third world countries DO NOT NEED A FUCKING DOLE.

They don't need help in the form of money.

They need help in the form of good governance and the removal of kebab.

They need help in the elimination of kleptocrats and sperglords who eat public funds and give precisely zero shits (unless it's on a road, then it's goddamn diarrhea).

Something many "intellectuals" (who also happen to be libtards - a funny thing when you think of it) don't seem to get.

so what's the story with the rss lately?

What a good idea.

Kind of busy. They're still preparing a list of kebab preachers to knock out. Whether they'll get to it sooner or later is anyone's guess.

They've got a few more of their cadres into the government. So that's progress. We hope. Especially since they're pretty good at convincing idiots that toilet witches don't exist.

There is enough food to feed the entire planet ten times over. MONEY is what stops people from having it.

How about you start selling your aids ridden asshole you nigger loving commie faggot

Because all other attempts of giving niggers money have worked out so well in the past.

>he thinks nigs can't buy food because they lack money
>he doesn't understand that nigs aren't making food because no one's gonna buy
>he doesn't understand that the profitability he decries is what keeps the food industry going
you'd better still be in high school faggot

Why so mad, italy?

>selling historical culture and beauty to feed dindus
FUCK
OFF

I don't understand the concept of church Vatican and all the other shit anyway.... If you believe in Jesus/God you can do it at home too so they're just like scientology. Fuck them

Would you be happy if he proposed to sell an historical landmark of your country like the taj mahal?

Oh shit he said 500 billion. In any case that's still like 100 bucks a pop. Gg you fed them for 3 days. Now theres still poor and starving and you just got rid of all your cultural artifacts.

Nice quads.
Nine times out of ten, intellectuals are total faggots.

The Brits tried. And failed. Plus, you guys were the heart of the Roman Empire.

What some libtard suggests should be of no consequence. Chill the fuck out. It's not like John "CURRENT YEAR" Green or any of his ilk can actually pull it off.

Sell Mecca first and then we'll talk.

tfw in the presence of a goldleaf post

Yes from the book of Sup Forums

Calm down, Bergoglio.

Wasn't this a Sarah Silverman quote?

Regardless, it's a retarded, childish autistic view of basically everything from money, the economy, the value of the vatican and the problems with feeding the poverty stricken.

>Some retard reading a book by himself cam do a better job of connecting with God than with the help of an institution that has had millions of brilliant minds working on it for over two millennium
Postmodern individualism folks

who the fuck would buy the Vatican though, how do they even begin to get objective valuations on the treasures and artworks inside? the word "priceless" means that things are impossible to actually value.

do they want it sold to developers and torn down, some of the most beautiful and historic buildings on the entire fucking planet? or turned into a museum, oh wait it's one already

The Wahabi cultists of Saudi Arabia are well into the process of smashing up anything of cultural or historical value in Mecca, much like their friends in ISIS. Have you not heard? For them, ancient heritage sites "encourage idolatry", i.e. simple people worship Muhammad's shoe or the house he grew up in rather than focus their worship on Allah. A bit like the craziest Puritans in the Reformation, smashing up priceless artworks and prehistoric monuments. In other words, there'll soon be fuck all left to sell of old Mecca. It's all being replaced with the most gaudiest of skyscrapers. Just look at the neo-Stalinist kitsch of the monstrosity they've built overshadowing the Kaba itself - pic related. Imagine how much historical architecture and archaeology were destroyed in the process. And this is the tip of the iceberg. I hate Islam and its "prophet" as much as the next man, but it grieves me to see how they destroy their heritage like this.

Takes 50 billion per year to feed everyone that needs it. So stop being retarded

I had no idea. Very informative post.

But I was talking about the whole buisness they have with their tents and fees for pilgrims.

I only heard fairly recently myself. I was shocked, and shocked at how shocked I was! I mean, I'd turn the entire peninsula into molten glass, and yet THIS kind of treatment seems FAR worse!

A bit more on it. Just downright sordid, isn't it?

>smashing up anything of cultural or historical value

I know... the Extremist Islamist are literally destroying their own ancestral historical legacies... The hatred of their own historical artifacts is hilarious... they are destroying their own history... go dumb goat fuckers.. GO!!!

HA Ha Ha

And how do mudslimes feel about this? Shouldn't they be mad?

The fuck did they do to Ben?!

...

feed the world thrice by ending animal agriculture, OP

>Disagree with me and you are anti-intellectual

I hear a lot of them think those towers are colossal abominations

Things like Notre Dame and the Sistine Chapel are kitschy as fuck too, but now that they're old they get a pass. In 500 years, that ugly as fuck skyscraper is going to be considered a beautiful historical landmark compared to our ugly floating carbon fiber buckyhomes.

Will modern skyscrapers last half a millennium?
At least the stone shit isn't anywhere near that high

Liberals loved throwing money at their problems.

Other peoples money at least

>if we feed poor people with stolen money its not theft anynore somehow

No he is fucking wrong

Lol. No.

Those edifices weren't built with the full intention of dwarfing and scorning the tradition they emerged from.

Ben?

>sell the Vatican
To who?

>own ancestral legacies

Except it often ISN'T their own. The Wahabis' homeland is in the centre of the country, the shitty miserable desert of the Nejd. Mecca is in Hejaz, which is quite different a region in terms of religion, culture and even dialect. Perhaps analogous to Prussians coming and smashing up Bavaria, or Yankies destroying the South.

>The fuck did they do to Ben?!

Dumb ass Anglo-Nigger... that is not Ben!
That is the Mecca Clocktower

Not to mention ISIS is composed of savages drawn from all over the world, who smash up the heritage of a civilisation whose most direct descendants are the Assyrian and Syrian Christians they likewise brutalise.

It looks like a horrible look in to the future of London.

Ah, BIG Ben! I get it now! :D Fucking Khan, eh...

It's like you don't even know where the word 'iconoclast' comes from. The reason Christianity sucks so much less than Islam today is that they've shit on their traditions a half dozen times more than Islam has. It's past time for Islam to play catch up.