>It's pretentious
>style over substance
>It tried to hard
What are some other good ways to spot brainlets?
>It's pretentious
>style over substance
>It tried to hard
What are some other good ways to spot brainlets?
Other urls found in this thread:
>to
Grammar is a Chinese hoax.
If they make a new thread on Sup Forums
>the highdad meme they post is smoking a cigarette instead of a doobie
>you are a contrarian that hates popular things!!
>Its overrated
Usually an American passport does it for me.
I only have kino debates with yuros.
This. Americans are unable to appreciate art.
but european films are all pretentious, style-over-substance crap that tries too hard.
leave
true true
HOW TO SPOT A PLEB 101
>only able to discuss literal plot points and the logical order of the narrative of a film
>every film has a singular universal "deep meaning" which you have to "get" to understand it
>"The writing is the most important filmmaking element!"
>downloading bad encodes of "1080p" films with atrocious digitally distorted 96kbps audio
>thinks that empty pretty pictures means "good cinematography"
>"I don't find this part of the narrative plausible or realistic, therefore the movie is SHIT!"
>treating a film like a puzzle which you have to put together in a certain kind of way to get it
>a film is either utter dogshit or a masterpiece, there is no inbetween
>"Who cares about editing, framing and composition sound and whatnot if the story isn't great."
>considers heavy use of symbolism as a positive factor
>using "boring" and "nothing happens" as arguments ever
>they think that PTA is a good director
>they think Kubrick is one of the greatest directors of all time
>they think Tarantino isn't a thieving hack
>they think Nolan is good
>they think Inarritu is good
>they think 21st century Scorsese is good
>they think Moonlight was the best movie of 2016, and not inferior as both a gay movie AND a black movie to the superior Miles Ahead, Being 17 and Spa Night
>they think that post-modernist sarcasm isn't cancer
>they think Ridley Scott isn't a turbohack
>they think either of the Disney Star Wars movies are better than Revenge of the Sith
They post any version of wojak
agree with every single point
this
>american
>owning a passport
lmao
>they think that PTA is a good director
faggot contrarian
>they think Kubrick is one of the greatest directors of all time
he's just trolling now
>they think Tarantino isn't a thieving hack
kill yourself
>they think Nolan is good
fucking die you armond-fag
>they think Inarritu is good
kek'd
>they think 21st century Scorsese is good
user I...
>they think Moonlight was the best movie of 2016, and not inferior as both a gay movie AND a black movie to the superior Miles Ahead, Being 17 and Spa Night
literally who movies
>they think Ridley Scott isn't a turbohack
>they think either of the Disney Star Wars movies are better than Revenge of the Sith
Agreed with the above
2/10 contrarian b8.
>People who say ''Film is supposed to be entertainment!''
>People who have 2001, Seven Samurai, Citizen Kane, other pleb shit on their top lists
>People who have seen 1 film made before the 50s and think they have taste
>People who like Wes Anderson and think they somehow have taste
>People with most movies on list made in last 20 years
>People who have no foreign language movies listed
>People who think korean cinema is good
>People who have movies from Nolan, Tarantino, Aronofsky, Kubrick, Refn, Snyder on their list
>People who have any comic book movie listed
>People who say comfy/based
plebus maximus
has to be bait
We have the same opinion its scary.
>Beautiful cinematography!
Of course this can be legitimate praise for a movie, but nearly all people who say this aren't able to explain why it's beautiful or how it fits in with the other aspects of the movie.
Brainlets 101
>I heard it was good, and I liked it, but I'm mad that I didn't discover it and Reddit likes it
refer to the post above the one you quoted, dumb contrarianposter