Is Martin Scorsese the greatest living artist?

Is Martin Scorsese the greatest living artist?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Hjxyc6BlT78
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Just what exactly are you trying to do?

do you reckon chloe let him eat her ass?

No, Terry Malick is

Who's that cutie beside him?

Scam artist? sure.

What is this expression meant to convey?

He's had quite the career and has made great movies even into his later years which can't be said of most

>some day i will be the biggest movie star in the world

Is Silence good? His older stuff is all kino, most of his recent stuff has been disappointing.

Mirin' those abs.

yall better stop making fun of Chloe before she hulk-jumps on your houses and rips you to shreds.

i-is this shooped?

thats the bottom of her ribcage

its hard to believe that this is the same girl who played the Hit-Girl

...

No, Madonna is.
Directing is hardly an art, most of the work is done by everyone else.
Even acting is more of an art.

>Madonna
This better be b8 you potential pleb

He's not wrong. If this was last year I would have said Bowie.

Absolutely not, Silence was a piece of boring steamy shit.

Do you think she had to service his wrinkly penis?

youtube.com/watch?v=Hjxyc6BlT78

Madonna in her 70s is dancing like this and making bank lip syncing with stellar production and years of creativity behind her.

Martin Scorsese is just sitting on a chair being ugly and old.

>artist

yeah
the only thing she did wrong was let a dog eat her out, but even then, who are you to say it wasn't art?

She defined music for awhile and has pretty much never stopped preforming or changing her sound. There's a lot of documentaries about her that basically boil down to saying that every thing she does is a performance, really interesting stuff. Not to mention she's been a singer, director, actor, writer, model and photographer, keeping up with each (aside from film) into her 70's.

nice tiddies

w-what

D Lynch
T Malick
/film/ when

no it's basically trash with his name on it to make it sell to normies with little brains

>She defined music for awhile
No she did not. She was massively popular for a while but her contribution to the art of music is basically non-existent in the grand scheme of things.

___ ___ __________ _________

god this fucking genius?

you're either a youngling (early 20s or younger), or you don't listen to a lot of music outside of a genre or two

Si

what did she mean by this?

that we are living in a material world

You have absolutely no idea about what you're talking about.

Anybody have that Chlopeye pic?

You weren't around in the 80's were you. Madonna was huge, you couldn't go a day without seeing reference to her. Girls were dressing like her, songs were copying her and her face was everywhere, something that went for almost ten years which is ridiculous considering how quickly trends in music shift.

JUST

Oldfag here, she was also pretty huge in the 90s

to be fair, she's 58 now

I would think it'd be him letting Chloe eat his ass

...

Martin Scorsese isn't even the greatest living Martin Scorsese

I am totally comfortable with saying he's the best director of his generation.

None of his colleagues have his track record.

Coppola, Spielberg and de Palma tapped out a long time ago.

Polanski is alright but not on Marty's level today. Woody Allen is legitimately impressive but too inconsistent.

Oh right, Cher is the 70 year old one.