PG 13

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

filmratings.com/downloads/cara_rating_bulletin.pdf

Other urls found in this thread:

nolanfans.tumblr.com/post/157900870658/christopher-nolan-interview-about-dunkirk-in
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I'm here for TDKR webms

>Baywatch
>graphic nudity
>crude sexual content
Plz be Daddario

That's Nolan for you. I think he's just afraid of blood because his Pg-13 is really soft sometimes.
Maybe making Insomnia broke him for good.

>Rated PG-13 for intense war experience and
some language

BRAVO NOLAN

>all the emotion and pain of war
>without any of the horrific violence or acts of savagery
BRAVO
R
A
N
O
L
A
N

>the gore porn of modern war movies properly portrays the emotion and pain of war
What's it like being 14?

Awesome. I can enjoy bland Nolan's flicks

let's see how much times people fall over without any blood

>Baywatch and Wonder Woman are R
>a war movie is PG13

>the movie is appropriate for a wide audience
>it must be bland
You are right, every movie needs to be directed by Eli Roth and be rated NC-17.

it's probably Efron's nutsack

>Baywatch
>R-rated

Interesting. I hope we see Mammario nude again.

literally so all the fangirls can go see harry styles
it'll be awful

Why is this surprising? All his movies are PG-13

>exploitation flicks are rated R
>nolan's new kino is subtle and therefor suitable for a wide audience
Nothing surprising

You know war vets had to walk out of Saving Private Ryans intro because it was too close to the real deal

>its a Hitler lets the brits live to fight another day episode
>fucking evil nazis!

Riveting

why did they go to see the movie in the first place?

>Wonder Woman
>R

Interesting I thought R was higher than NC-17

i'm ok with this

I'm not saying it's unrealistic, however it is shown out of context and is cynically used by Hollywood to feed into the bloodlust of lesser minds.

They both require you to be 17, but NC-17 is pretty much just reserved for softcore porn.

How

it is according to that list but they seem to be talking about an animated movie

aren't his previous movies mostly pg 13 ?

yeah pg-13 war films where nothing too violent or bloody is shown is much better. Stops kids from thinking war is hell or anything and we always need new recruits

>NOTE: WONDER WOMAN: DIRECTOR'S CUT, BULLETIN NO. 2466 (3/8/17) EDITED VERSION - THIS
FILM IS ANIMATED.
What did they mean by this?

You have to be accompanied by a person over the age of 17 to see an R rated movie. They will not let people under the age of 17 into an NC-17 movie.

I don't know

I'm not American and I always thought R was synonymous with gore and sex

If you think kids actually get the message that war is bad from Hollywood movies you might be mentally handicapped. Movies glorify war and violence to an insane degree, and exposing children to onscreen violence desensitises them to real violence.

>I'm not American

Neither am I, any other worthless excuses?

Every fucking time "I'm not American", might as well print "I'm a fucking twat" backwards on your forehead so you don't forget, because only a twat wouldn't look it up!

So what? I don't get it. Can't a (war) movie be intense without gore? How do you guys know without even seeing anything? You don't even know the themes it will deal with.
>it is shown out of context
That's completely untrue. The scene is probably one of the best atmosphere setters. It has a utility and it is in context.

lmao be more autistic you fucking nerd

laughable

It is true that it gets used gratuitously sometimes for entertainment, but a serious war film shouldn't have to shy away from perhaps the defining element of war. I could see you making this argument for a pg movie where you're trying to convey the tragedy to kids without traumatizing them, but if anything is cynical it's the nerfing of a clearly adult film in order to sell to more teenagers. Maybe this will be good, but I have a feeling this is another instance of Nolan's reach exceeding his grasp. He always compromises his movies to appeal to a lower common denominator, but at this point it seems like he's actually just not smart enough to make a smart movie. Entertaining, sure, but that's all.

>Bad films glorify war and violence to an insane degree
ftfy bud

to have a good time

Can someone please explain to me while studios care so much about rating?
I have never seen anyone being asked for ID when going to the cinema. And if ratings dictate the times at which a particular release can be screened? Who cares? It's not like any screening before 8pm is ever packed anyway.

Because statistically R rated movies make less money than PG13. So it's not worth the risk to the studio.

More potential viewers = more potential sales

American film rating system is flawed

That maybe true for films where younglins are part of the target audience. But something like Dunkrik, I don't see it gaining more viewers because 13-15 yr olds are allowed to see it.

Teenagers like War movies too, and they'll watch anything with Nolan's name attached to it.

The rating makes sense in terms of the story, he doesn't want to make a yet another Saving Private Ryan

Some excerpts from an extensive Dunkirk interview:

>(Smile.) Do not repeat it to the studio: it will be my most experimental film. By far. I preferred to make a sensory, almost experimental movie. Without dialogue. The soldiers have no history - at least I don’t tell it. Most of the crew didn’t understand why I was screening them The Wages of Fear. But it was the one that made the most sense. Which talks about mechanics, procedure and physical difficulties. I rewatched Pickpoket and Un condamné à mort s’est échappé, just for that. Bresson details everything, creates suspense with details.

>[Saving Private] Ryan is a film about the body, blood, fear of being dismembered. Fear is physical. Steven was able to create a visceral intensity of the experience of war. Dunkirk doesn’t play in the same category. It’s a movie with suspense and a race against time.

>It isn’t by accident that Heart of Darkness by Conrad is one of my favorite novels. It’s the purest form of geography and storytelling. Conrad never repeats himself, he sinks gradually into the depths of the human mind. Is it an inward journey or a trip out of oneself ? That’s the real question Conrad is asking. And 2001! And Dante! How to tell the trip ? This is the main question of cinema. Dunkirk speaks about a very special place that evokes the Bible squarely. In May 1940, the English were the Jews driven out of Egypt and driven back by the Red Sea. And in a Judeo-Christian civilization it adds a very strong level of mythology.

nolanfans.tumblr.com/post/157900870658/christopher-nolan-interview-about-dunkirk-in

>he doesn't want to make a yet another Saving Private Ryan

Good signs already.

SPR is literally the most overrated movie of all time.

I'm not trying to defend Bravo Nolan or anything, but films like Zulu and All Quiet on the Western Front prove that you can have a war movie that isn't rated R.

actually everything made by nolan is overrated

this isn't even a war movie

its a bunch of inbreds swimming across the channel for an hour and half

why the fuck? nolan u piece of shit
u can't make a war movie pg13 u fucking hack
i was looking forward to this too

teenagers dont give a shit about nolan

Still a very good movie though.

Those were before pg-13 rating even existed. Are you really comparing a 2017 movie to a 1930's movie in terms of what censors mean?

My grandpa had a hard time dealing with Giovanni's gut shot in the movie.
The combination of the dark blood and him begging for another dose of morphine brought back bad memories of when he was a medic.

Yea that scene is fucking disturbing. A bunch of them are though. When the dudes getting stabbed and his friend is too scared to enter the room and save him. Super fucked up.

Wonder Woman rated R? bullshit, there is literally no way that will happen

Teenagers suddenly don't like Dark Knight or Inception? When did those become mature adult only movies?

>no dialogue
>The Wages of Fear, Pickpocket and Heart of Darkness for inspiration

Looks like kino is back on the menu boys.

Back in the 80s maybe. Now the MPAA will give you an R rating for a non villainous character smoking, or dropping more than the two F-bombs.
It's genuinely a pretty retarded system. Watch "This film has not yet been rated" if you're curious.

A 14 year old was 7 when Inception came out. They might not even know about it.

It is, but the MPAA was self imposed by the studios to avoid a government or outside agency stepping in to rate or censor movies.
It was to avoid controversy like you saw in the music obscenity trials in the mid 80s where the PMRC went on the warpath. It was eventually settled when the recording industry decided to impliment the parental advisory sticker known as the "tipper sticker," named after Tipper Gore, the head of the PMRC.

go back to your own thread jackass

Nobody like Inception to begin with.

I like it. Not amazing, but good for an action movie, and one of nolan's better movies.

No, Rises and Inception is when Nolan's downfall.
Sucker Punch was much better.

Objectivley wrong.

It's not gory? So what, there are plenty of non-gory war movies that are classics. I'm not a Nolan fan (except for The Prestige), but this means nothing, it could still be a good movie. If you want a gore fest watch Hacksaw Ridge or SPR again, not every war movie has to copy the same 'muh horrors of war' shock treatment.

Nolan is a fucking autist loser.

Only idiots like inception
Which makes up quite alot of the audience

Less than 1% of people who saw TDK or TDKR did so because Nolan directed them. The saw it for Batman. As far as Inception, most people saw it because of DiCaprio and it looked like an innovative thriller with great reviews and word of mouth.

>movie about going into dreams
>all the dreams are robotic action sequences on snowmobiles or the hallway is sideways

Such imaginative visuals.

>all the dreams are robotic action sequences on snowmobiles or the hallway is sideways

Those are only two of many technically impressive set pieces in the movie, I don't understand your argument.

What are the others?
A the city turning sideways?
An abandoned city?

I understand Nolan doesn't understand actual people, he's a robotic freakazoid who doesn't understand emotions, but he should've realized the mundane fuckery he dreams about doesn't compare to what actual human beings dream about.

What did you expect? Monsters and superpowers?
The point was that the dream has to be stable and "real" to implant the idea properly, you can't do that if you have ayylmaos and people flying up and down.

Also yes most people in general dream about real life situations, I doubt you dream about other wordly planets every single night.

I dream about weird bullshit more than I dream about being on a vespa in italy or my house being upside down.

>What did you expect? Monsters and superpowers?

I expected dreamlike visuals. Not vaguely sci-fi action that's less imaginative than what I could see in Mission Impossible or James Bond.

Depends on the director.

Hacksaw Ridge was terrible and gory as fuck

Well this is shit news...

If the war scenes are like in TDKR when Banes army and Gothams polices battles it's gonna be shit and just view war as some superhero battle...

I mean it's war. Summer blockbuster war?

Not the user you are arguing with, but I guess your argument is that it should have been for instance more "Lynch-ian" or Bunuel-ian"? Dreamlike nonsensical visuals and situations?
I don't know man, but they are supposed to be able to control those to a level or something. I agree that limbo should have been more bizarre and free but I think what he did served the movie fine.

...

Will this be more kino than interstellar? Even more than the opening scene of TDKR?

This needs a much better trailer.

Do you think Nolan's historical films will be wackier, as a sort of compromise for his more realistic fantasy films?

>trusting this man with a movie with a lot of action scenes

The land, air and sea concept sounds very compelling. We've heard nothing about who these characters are -- I don't mean their histories but their actual role in the war, and what they think about it.

Inception's problem was not having too little imagination, but having too many generic action scenes at the expense of the characters. If Nolan's taking a page from French films then he may have solved this issue already.

>80th post in a Nolan thread
>first tdkr webm
This place is going to the dogs

TDK actually does have some of the most creative action scenes in any movie, even if you don't like the editing.

What's it like being a pussy?

War ain't clean.

Memento and Insomnia weren't tho

Rekt

In fairness, most of the attacks at Dunkirk were aerial (ie. pew-pew explosions). There weren't too many battles on the ground IIRC.