I'm glad we have a platform to state things without being silenced by political correctness; emotion shouldn't trump logic and facts. To that end, I don't believe it's a class issue or a race issue, it's a gender issue.
Consider the following, in just the U.S. alone: >Men commit 86.6% of all robbery, despite being only 49% of the population >Men commit 88.3% of all murder, despite being only 49% of the population >Men commit 98.1% of all rape, despite being only 49% of the population >Among young people, men kill 10x more than women.
In fact, regardless of income, location, time period, or race, men make up the majority perpetrator of every crime except prostitution! Men are more likely to be repeat offenders, to cause more property manage, inflict the most severe injuries, to join gangs, and to be long term career criminals.
It can't all be simply blamed on social constructs; it may be because boys experience stunted growth in empathy in adolescence, which leads to things like men perceiving rape victims more negatively than women.
Whatever the case may be, we need to have a sit down talk about male culture and its problems, without throwing out buzzwords like "sexist". Statistics and science don't lie. And they can CLEARLY never be biased, or manipulated into portraying a narrative that isn't true.
It is not girls shooting everything up, it is boys. Therefore, more girls less crime.
The push will be to alter the sex ratio, in western societies, to 10:1 girls to boys. Then, eventually, 99:1 girls to boys.
Camden Hernandez
Also men can into cuddly loving relationships while worthless women just want babies and to be leeches.
Dont worry, the end of women will come soon, once artificial birth is finally achieved, women will become absolutely worthless ;^)
Ethan Nguyen
It seems based on the statistics the best thing to do for society would be to genocide men that make under $500,000. Sup Forums's love of genetic determinism tells me the alpha seed would be well represented among the richest men.
Honestly without men, there would be no crime or war. They are vile primitive beasts that can't contain their rage, emotions, or judgement.
Almost all atrocities in history were committed by men.
Michael Robinson
No killing. That would be hypocritical for women to advocate killing on the grounds there is too much killing. And women are never hypocritical. ;-)
This will be breeding. Only XX chromosome babies will be conceived. It won't take a generation either. With artificial insemination/wombs millions of new girls could get created daily.
Jaxon Baker
Men are the glue that hold society together, your rationalizing is just warped. Have you ever considered suicide? Your mental disorder might hurt people in real life sooner or later, you don't want that do you?
Landon Martin
Wow, I never thought of it that way. You should exterminate all your white blood cells for the same reason.
Thomas Martinez
Honestly that does seem like a way more efficient idea.
>Men are the glue that hold society together, your rationalizing is just warped. >Men commit nearly all crime.
Women have never had a chance to control society. A matriarchal society would be best. At some point you have to evolve and give up disgusting, primitive ways.
Men are beasts that can't control themselves. They see a woman and want to rape her. Absolutely disgusting.
>hold society together From what? Unraveling? Unraveling happens with crime. Look at you refusing to acknowledge facts.
Typical man, thinking with emotion/bind rage over logic.
Jordan Powell
You really, really don't want to see what happens when women are segregated from males.
I think you will suicide.
Leo Price
>Men are the glue that hold society together, True, but technology is rapidly replacing male labor.
Look at all the recent stories of the coming self-driving vehicles that will do away with truck drivers. Or farming that will be done with robot tractors. Mining via drilling robots. Etc...
The same (or more) number of biological men will be replaced with robot. No one has to die in some sort of gendercide nonsense. Just that more girls will be born. Women, in fact, prefer girls. They can relate to them better than boys. They can be companions sharing similar interests.
Again, more girls less crime. All these shootings are being perpetrated by males, not females. Nothing can more conclusively solve the violence problems, plaguing our society, than to alter the sex ratio to, at least, 10:1 girls to boys.
#MoreGirlsLessCrime
Grayson Reyes
LMAO.
>That ego >The world revolves around me!
Men are disgusting. Yeah the world would sure be way worse without any crime, rape. or theft huh? Pretty warped mind you have there, primitive little beast.
Leo Adams
They're also >the majority of the working force, >the ones that take the riskiest jobs and hardest jobs, >the ones that work the longest, >the majority of our police forces and military.
You're retarded. Kill yourself.
Jackson Ward
>The push will be to alter the sex ratio, in western societies, to 10:1 girls to boys And you have a unique opportunity to get in on the ground floor. This won't be an overnight change, it will take years to accomplish. Imagine how much fun you'll have as the one man for 100 women.
Of course, by the time it gets to the stage of testes in a jar producing sperm 24/7, things will be a little less cheerful for those with a Y chromosome. But you'll be long dead by then. Enjoy the good times while they're available.
Nicholas Adams
No segregation. With 10 girls for every guy, every male will be at the center of a harem. He will be so busy, all day and night long fucking all these horny, desperate females, he will not have the energy to shoot up anything.
Giving every male his own harem would decisively solve all the violence problems in the Middle East.
Juan Flores
where's the mods when you need them
Cooper Gutierrez
This is some high effort baitwork, 7/10
Joseph Foster
>learn to drop your ego >realize we are all human >wait sorry you are a whale >whales dont have an ego
Nathaniel Hughes
The computer revolution proved to me once and for all that the cunts are useless.
40 years of access to computers, and no cunt has picked one up and made something.
The world is full of male programmers who went into their basement with a computer and a book and came out with Linux.
Not one cunt has done the same. On the contrary, with things EASIER THAN EVER, they are still whining to males and demanding more "inclusive programs" for women when everything anyone needs to do anything is already as cheap and available as it can get.
You can buy a computer for $15 and program at your Starbucks on Wifi and still no cunts program.
I am completely secure as a male. Cunts aren't even human.
Colton Moore
No.
>Only XX chromosome babies will be conceived. It won't take a generation either. With artificial insemination/wombs millions of new girls could get created daily.
Jace Bailey
...
Jordan Jenkins
Also, this is what a female majority society looks like (pic related)
Connor White
Get out tumblriana
Samuel Hughes
>Everyone ITT
Christian Nguyen
On the contrary, it's women who are superfluous.
The world is overpopulated and men are superior in every regard.
Women are weak dumb breeder cows.
What we need is a small population of high-quality males.
Gavin Hall
LMFAO. Ignorant male detected. The first general computing machine was built by a fucking woman.
Programming in the early 1940's was a female dominated practice. When it became financially worth something, men pounded their chests and pushed women out (like the primal territorial beasts they are). Men had the majority of the capital in 1940 because women had been subjugated to not working or being independent for 2000 years. Men held the money, held the power and took over the industry out of greed.
You are a clueless creature incapable of critical thought.
Blake Perez
>not seeing the reports FROM WOMEN about what happens when all-women shit is in effect >the infighting >the backstabbing >the scheming
Women really do act so "intelligent" to cover how little they really fucking know about themselves. It's cute.
Landon Ramirez
>Hurr durr Survivor utilizing westerners with little stake in real survival is an accurate representation of reality.
Kill yourself you inferior creature.
Logan Robinson
>Pretty warped mind you have there, primitive little beast.
You're not actually interested in having a debate, are you? Looks like you're just here to rile up Sup Forums
Jeremiah Hughes
Have you considered that women are underrepresented in crime statistics because they tend to do literally nothing all day?
Levi Howard
>t can't all be simply blamed on social constructs; it may be because boys experience stunted growth in empathy in adolescence, which leads to things like men perceiving rape victims more negatively than women.
It's genetics.
Men are more aggressive than women because of how human sexuality works. If women were the ones who did all the work, and men just sat at home popping out babies, you'd see the reverse.
>Women have never had a chance to control society. See pic.
Repeats itself in any situation women are forced to fend for themselves. This is because they are not biologically evolved to do work, fight, or survive; men are. With that biological predisposition also comes a greater capacity for violence, because might makes right - it's a necessity. Which you even tacitly admit to earlier in your posts.
Essentially all you've argued for in the thread is the removal of 'undesirable males' - not men outright.
Lucas Cook
>You're not actually interested in having a debate, are you?
Debate? You said nothing of substance. You stated your opinion then I laughed at you for being incapable of producing a sound argument. I have provided empirical data and statistics with an original argument, you said your opinion.
She was the equivalent of a gamer grrrlll camwhore today except she had high society orbiters like Edgar Allen Poe.
Keep making excuses you dumb whore. If you could have done it, you would have by now.
You are an inferior species.
Brayden White
>Programming in the early 1940's was a female dominated practice
Misinformation, they weren't programming, they were glorified secretaries doing the equivalent of data entry.
The programs were already written for them - by men.
Jason Williams
>implying she didn't steal all of babbage's praise/work because of 'muh vagina'
Logan Bennett
Your pic see: That's how uncreative men are.
You said nothing of fact. Merely pseudo-darwinian social conjecture. Worthless. Humans adapt. Women are most adaptable and can easily fill any role a man can, if not better.
Blake Collins
>women had been subjugated to not working or being independent for 2000 years
The fact that women work today has nothing to do with equality and everything to do with increasing the supply side of the labour markets while demand stays relatively the same - which pushes down wages.
Literally nothing to do with female emancipation, and everything to do with making more money.
Jace Scott
Kill them all imo. And ship ladies to the Europe.
Wyatt Martinez
>Merely pseudo-darwinian social conjecture.
This perfectly describes your own post: >Women are most adaptable and can easily fill any role a man can, if not better.
Luke Hall
So you just confirmed the existence of the patriarchy. Thanks for doing my work for me. That's my point. You are criminal animals that hold institutional power. You've been driving our planet and society into the ground for the last 30-45 years with your myopic, short sighted thinking.
Just as primal are when it comes to sex, they are with money. You are destroying the world with globalism. Men created globalism for men to make more money.
Jacob Butler
The rich thing about all these threads is that it's never a FEMALE TEAM that accomplishes anything. Females isolated from males are so incompetent that it's pathetic. Female spaces devolve into inane crabby catfights because females lack vision.
All "accomplished" females are either solitary (in which case they amount to mediocre males) or surrounded by a huge male support staff constantly making up for their mental deficiencies with advice and breaking up their pointless catty bullshit.
Women are always a net negative except for routine supervised maintenance tasks that are completely beneath males.
Luis Hernandez
>women commit 100% of all abortion, despite being only 51% of the population
Noah Sanders
Men hold institutional power because women are incapable and inferior.
Yet, in spite of this we've given women essentially everything they've ever asked for, but still there is no end to the demands; it is not enough.
Now we're in the process of destroying our entire society because women truly don't know or understand what they want.
Juan Martin
>always >never >All >completely
More pseudo-darwinian social conjecture except this time you are using absolutes.
#ManLogic
Austin Watson
And the roastie concedes defeat.
Jonathan Williams
>How female hierarchy works out in practice
Wyatt Johnson
>Implying terminating a non-sentient clump of cells sustained solely by the mothers body is equivalent to murder.
#ManLogic
Damn, maybe we should start regulating men's masturbation. They destroy so many non-sentient sex cells. Disgusting genocide of human life!!11
Jordan Adams
>Women are most adaptable and can easily fill any role a man can, if not better. Women are physically weaker than men and develop less muscle with the same amount of training. They have monthly bouts in which their bodies actively punish them for not impregnating themselves. They have thick thighs and thin calves, which makes them prone to twisting at the knee. What about that is desirable?
Lincoln Allen
Aww is the vapid whore upset?
Leo Williams
More statistics showing that women are the predominant aggressors in relationships.
Though the OP's statistics about male violence is true - it is almost universally male against male. Very little male violence is visited upon women; the same is not true for female violence.
Aiden Ramirez
Saged
Jackson Gomez
>Honestly without men, there would be no crime or war.
OP is completely correct and I have accepted these statistics for what they are, although they will cause cognitive dissonance among many of the more edgier people on Sup Forums
Adrian Brooks
Clinton is a globalist pig. She's playing the game like a man. I fucking hate Hillary Clinton.
Lets not forget men started and pushed globalism.
>What is neoconservatism.
Clintonism is the same thing.
Adrian Bennett
>The first general computing machine was built by a fucking woman.
No, it wasn't.
Jaxson Cook
>Consider the following, in just the U.S. alone:
Goddam single moms.
Henry Sullivan
well lets just rely on female advancements then is it op you cuck? I'm sure dying from radium poisoning while listening to an unpowered radio outside in the dirt would be great you communist fag.
Logan Hall
Once western civilization collapses, you'll get a bullet in the head if you suggest that equality bull shit.
Robert Gray
When I found your post, I decided to read what has already been written down before responding to anything with a thought out argument. I got to the text I quoted in my previous post and made a conclusion based on behavior you've been exhibiting.
Due to how you are responding to everyone with insults and put downs, I doubt the reason you are here is to test if your beliefs and facts can stand up to public scrutiny. Why should I put in the effort to write out a thorough argument when you present yourself in a way that leads me to believe you are disingenuous?
Ethan Morris
Women now have a lot of power in western society now, look how fucked up everything is. This is going to cost the next generations a lot of hard work to fix, thanks for basically fucking up my future grandson's future.
James Barnes
Brilliant, then fuck off and start your own civilizations.
Aiden Hughes
OP you are shortsighted. Breeding programs won't change the male:female ratio. They'll change the kids, regardless of sex. We'll have kids with no desire to do harm to others. Kids with the cognition to be peaceful, to be hard working, to be motivated, to be forward thinking, to be creative, and to be the best of the best. People that walk the earth will be sterile, their children manufactured by hospitals. Disease and defects will be neutralized. Marriage will become short-term, purely for raising kids. And everyone will be totally sexually liberated.
All this happens, then we figure out how to breed adults directly. There won't be kids anymore. Everyone will be born with the lessons of past generations, with the most current understanding of the universe, with the skills to carry humanity into the dark. Each one of us will be a part of the extremely intelligent master race.
Then we'll compartmentalize breeding, down to a device that we can put on drone ships that fly to other star systems, even to Andromeda. We'll colonize the local group with these breeding platforms. Humanity will dominate the local group. This is our future. Modern society must simply live long enough for this to happen. Don't fuck it up.
Luke Collins
except, unlike niggers, white men actually produce a great deal of value. i'm assuming the point of your post is to parody Sup Forums anti-nigger arguments. doesn't work, faggot.
