Why were Anglos so inferior to the Romans?

Why were Anglos so inferior to the Romans?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etruscan_civilization
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagia_Sophia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediterraneanism
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

King Arthur beat back the Roman savages. Checkmate.

Anglos are part roman because Rome took England over.

Then it got more roman blood through the Normal Conquests.

Celts were the subhumans

...

Why were Christians so inferior to the Muslims?

kek thanks for new bait

Actually the building on the left is Greek temple from a Greek colony on the Italian peninsula.

Why are you targeting Anglos specifically?

>Describing the Caledonian tribes of ancient Scotland in the early third century AD, Dio Cassius wrote:

>'They inhabit wild, waterless mountains and lonely, swampy plains, without walls, cities, or cultivated land. They live by pasturing flocks, hunting, and off certain fruits. They live in tents, unclothed and unshod, sharing their women and bringing up all their children together.'

Normans were vikings that settled in France you fag.

9/10 bait pretty good

>bait
Whatever you say christcuck

Emperor Justinian is my favourite Emperor tbqh lad

and when rome fell, England continued
...into a great naval empire.
>cherry-picking history?

The British as a combined unit made the British empire great, not just England.

>amerifag history

...

A minority of Normands were vikings, most of the conquest was made with Frankish soldiers and aristocracy, take a look at the companions of Guillaume if you want.

Guillaume was absolutly Viking though.

...

isn't that s. Sofia on the left the one that muslims turned ito whait is this bait??

>this is what scotcucks believe

welsh and english were the only relevant groups. you fags are cunts

umm i wonder witch is older anyway that is a moder building on the right

This.

so on the left we have a brazilian a aborigen from australia a black dude from argentina a turk (not europe) dunno the other guy with the mustache...ah no need to mention that cyvilty was created by the greeks ebraced by the romans and by the barbaryans later ??

...

>a fucking ruin

kek

Age doesn't matter senpai, face it the Romans were sub-humans

Greeks (as far as Minoans) taught everything to romans, the biggest achievement of Romans over greeks was their administration that allowed to transform the greek city model in an Empire.

You call that b8 you sheep shagging discount aussie?

Do they know that Nigel banned the christians, right?

>Hundoara castle
>Magyar

we lived in mud huts before romans came

we were kangz

Etruscans had already received Greek influence even further back. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etruscan_civilization

It was basically rebuilt in its current form by Magyar architects from Budapest (Imre Steindl, Ferenc Schulz) in the late 1800s...

how come kangaroo fuckers don't use vpn? only bait and shitposting comes from land down under :^)

Because they came from Germany.

And the Greeks learned a lot of what they new off the Babylonians, Phoenicians and Persians.

that's celt not anglo

They were shit. They didn't have guns. They didn't have internet. They didn't have tanks.

What actually DID they have?

Um, you do FUCKING REALISE the Romans and Greeks were Nordic right?

Even the mesopotamians had blonde hair/blue eyes.

But no, keep drinking the jew kool aid and spitting on your white heritage.

We didn't use slaves to build our churches. We built them ourselves.

Though I'm sure with an unlimited slave network that also consisted of innocent Christians, Muslims could force them to build whatever the hell they wanted. To hell with the danger and impossibility of size, just throw more bodies at it until it hold together, right?

Advanced sewage system.
Romans literally BTFO indians for decades!

...

Leave it to the Germans to stand up for the Greeks.

The Anglos came after the Romans left. The romans encountered the Celts.
Yes the Romans were superior to the Celts. They revolutionised Britain with the Roman way of life and knowledge.
Just as the British Empire was superior to the countries in inhabited and revolutionised.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagia_Sophia

you got aussie'd

Notice that all of these people are mediterranean. There's a reason this ideology was a thing and the main opposition to Nordicism at the time: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediterraneanism

>Italian anthropologist Giuseppe Sergi claimed that the Mediterranean race was "the greatest race in the world". He defined it as "the finest brunet race which has appeared in Europe…derived neither from the black nor white peoples, but constitut[ing] an autonomous stock in the human family.".[2]:24–27 Sergi claimed that the Mediterranean Race probably historically spoke a Hamitic language related to the language of the prehistoric Egyptians, Iberians, and Libyans.[2]:24–27 Sergi noted that the Roman Empire led to the spread of Mediterranean civilization across Europe and thus contemporary European civilization was bound by ancestry to the Mediterranean race.

That's Roman architecture, the Muslims stole it from the Byzantine Empire.

WE

DAS RITE DEM RACIST MUZLEMS STOLE OUR KULTURE

Hence, Judeo-Islam.

well you baiting

...

m8 we have an inbuilt need to shitpost

>They live in tents

That's simply not true, though.

Pic related.

...

the romans were cucked by mongols
>gib back muh legions

checkmate, whitey

Imagine being an Anglo, inferior to other peoples. Then imagine being so shit as an inferior Anglo you get exiled half way around the world.

>Magyar architects
>Steindl
>Schulz
yes, bitches! hungry stronk!

>Atilla was dumb enough to get convinced by a pope to turn back

kek

King Arthur was Roman. Checkmate.

Yeah? And Argentinians are white.

You're thinking of the Anglos.
Arthur was a proud Romanised Briton who fought the Anglo invaders after the Romans had departed Britannia.

King Arthur was still a Roman.

The germanic tribes were just way more primitive.

No! That's not true! The ancient Romans wuz Nordic n shiet. Germanics totally weren't responsible for causing the dark ages, I swear! We dindu nuffin.

G-Germanic master race!

...

>Magyar Architect
>Austrian names
>Austrian period

Sure thing Pisti.

I wonder where did they get the bullshit that they were all blonde.

Medieval kings and dukes claiming we wuz romans and trying to use any bit of leverage to legitimize the claim.

>Precisely the opposite view emerged during the Age of Discovery.

At least read the shit, damn.

WE

WUZ

ROMANZ

AND DA ACHUNT EJEEPSHUNS

Born in Hungary.
Mother tongue Hungarian.
Strong Magyar identity.

Yep, Schulz and Steindl were Magyars!

Anglo's get their creative energy from drinking Aryan blood

Everyone was inferior to Rome at the height of both the Republic and the Empire.

is there an actually nice romanian city built by romanians?
>inb4 bucharest

Com block architecture has ruined most cities. You can still find nice towns and smaller cities, but besides Iasi city center and maybe Constanta they are quite ugly.

Targu Jiu was nice last I saw it.

>Just as the British Empire was superior to the countries in inhabited and revolutionised.

stealing their resources and making wealthy (((british)) wealthier?

Some are described as blondes in the original sources, like achilles, which is very light in the fresco too.
And it's not like the colours have been preserved unchanged or where intended to be photorealistic to begin with.

There are blonde Mediterraneans, albeit they're less common than brown haired ones.

However I think that most of the faggots on Sup Forums that claim this are delusional stormfags who believe in muh aryan master race and think that ancient greeks & romans were somehow aryan, and that modern day mediterraneans aren't the same group of people.

I've seen that movie too. Its not accurate, at all.

Photos of faded paintings in dark lighting. And they still look white. Achilles even looks blonde.

Written sources, such as Homer. They weren't all fair haired however, some were though.

>White means Scandinavian now apparently

You would know, we shipped all our theives off to Australia after all.

You know Romans claimed to be the successor of the Trojans right. They weren't 'Greece's biggest fans'

>30BC
>French

>He thinks he means South and West Africans
>Not Egyptians and Carthaginians

This source is shit, and clearly doesn't understand its own source.

>tfw entire life thought i was anglo saxon
>recently got comprehensive info on family tree
>absolutely nothing but pure irish and scottish
DÚISIGH MÉ

WE

You mean, there were normal people living in these temples? It wasn't only for the Gods and their servants?