Was women's rights a mistake?

Was women's rights a mistake?

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.me/10728088
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Yes and no.

Yes

Of course. How is this a question?

No, mobilizing the free-loading 50% of our population into the work-force was not a mistake.

YES

Lower wages for men while single whores suck money from good members of society; good job goy.

They should be home taking care of their children

Yeah that's turned out real great.

Yes it was. But those titties ain't.

Just no.

Yes

I like little girls.

Yes.

Rape should be legal.

no

hello muhammad how are you?

>Rape should be legal.

no, fuck that. we have too many people on this earth as it is.

Just look at the GDP growth before and after.

>it was da woomenz
>not because of industrial war complex and other economic events

haHAHAHA

(I am guessing you are referring to around this time)

we have too many niggers and poo in loos and gooks.
First 2 arent human, last dosnt have soul.

we have too many people, period. too many of all races.

>Just look at the GDP growth before and after.

Who gives a flying fuck about GDP growth

I know sociopaths like you can't really grasp this, but there are more important things than money.

Female emancipation has almost destroyed the very foundations of our society. They are gullible and easily manipulated and it has allowed bad actors within government and business to fuck our society over by appealing to them.

rights are good. allowing them to be in charge of government is bad. that includes voting on anything beyond local civic issues excluding education.

To an extent. At my job the women get paid the same as men, and can't lift nearly as much as we do, so the men are expected to do what they cant.

Enforce forced abortions.

Of course

Is she Finnish or something? Her face is so fucked

Not really. Race is way, WAY more important than gender in terms of politics. The "women are to blame for welfare" meme needs to stop. If the US was all white, Obama would have never been president, and republicans would win almost every year.

Getting women into the workplace makes for a more efficient economy. That was a good move. In retrospect it's amazing that sometimes even the poor had women living full time at home.

Everything else was a mistake.

Have you looked at voting statistics or listened to college age white girls ever in your life?

NIGGERS ARENT PEOPLE you dumb burger mongrel, there isnt too many people, there are too many parasite subhumans.

does it really make the economy more efficient? seems like a lot of jobs were created out of thin air just to plug women in

if they married alpha white males they would vote with their husbands. quit being neet beta faggots.

she is a 20/10 in the US, lard arse

yes

liberals don't marry alpha white men and your whole point leads to the conclusion only men should be able to vote because good women will vote with their husbands.

>Does more jobs make the economy more efficient?

>i hate women

yeah we got that pretty clearly there

No, women deserve to have certain freedoms and rights. Women's suffrage however.

The sexual revolution was a mistake. I don't have a problem with "women's rights" whatever that means. I have no problem with actual universal civil rights. I just have a problem with special groups having special rights.

And I have a problem with fags and women trying to undermine the family and traditional gender roles.

>You need to fill a women diversity quota
>make job that does fuck all to produce industry so woman can do it
>pay women money for no industry created
>new job created

lets think about this Norway

Yes.

Yes. Women's frailty prejudices them against supporting individual liberty and responsibility. Women who enter the workforce reduce men's wages. It used to be possible to sustain a family on a single working class salary. No more. Feminism is driven by an unholy alliance between large corporations who want cheaper labor and the Left, who want to sterilize women, promote sexual license and abort children. Also, women have overly possessive tendencies, which can become very malicious when they rise to positions of power in organizations.

Putting short term goals ahead of longer term sustainability.
But i guess that is capitalism in a nutshell

Marryed man get two votes?!
For each child a half vote?

More responsebilety and so forth more weigth to a vote?

GDP would've grown regardless due to the postwar economy. What women in the workforce did was lower the per capita GDP of all existing employees in the fields they entered which led directly to the crisis today where men are unable to support a family on their own. And when both hypothetical parents have to work to survive you won't see many people having kids and those who do will often be raised by the crooked education system.
Other factors contributed as well but the widespread employment of women was a big one.

Is this even a question anymore

>Should we have genetic replacement immigration

pic related. Fuck women

No, it's just that the current definition of rape is wrong. Rape is using a cunt who belongs to somebody else. So, if a cunt isn't married and doesn't live in her father's house she can't be raped.
Little girls are best, way better than grown women in every way.

Women shouldn't be allowed to vote unless they prove in some way or another that they care bout politics

99.999999% of women don't give a niglet's nut filled shit and just vote what their husband, friend, or worst of all, the women person running

Everything else is fair game I suppose though

Did they vote again?

Of course it was a mistake...women voting is the worst idea ducking possible...they can barely drive cars. Have you ever seen a girl try and play any videogame? When a girl plays an fps it's like watching a 4-5 year old male play even when they're grown woman.
Literally women struggle with simple tasks.

It should be legal to marry multiple women to shut out the betas. Read your Bible.

I wouldnt fuck that mongol faced gash even with your dick bra

Women should have rights, just not the right to vote

That's cause you can only get off to lady boy fag boy ;)

rough numbers adjusted for inflation:
Dec 31, 1950 $2.27 trillion 20% of women in workforce, working population: 60 million
Dec 31, 1980 $6.50 trillion 50% of women in workforce, working population: 110 million

1950: 0.0378 $tn/million workers
1980: 0.0590 $tn/million workers

Despite the fact 1980 had thirty years of technological advancement, it was only twice as productive at the cost of destroying the traditional family. Hardly worth it when you consider the women working at home can be considered an unpaid job.

Yes but so is democracy

>OT

u sure showed him bro

That's why I frequent Librechan now. That have a Sup Forums board there too.

>Every fucing day with this. Dude just cut your fucking dick off commit suicide and stop posting this shit.

Thanks for taking away my privilege to sit at home, play video games and raise a few kids, then making husbandu a sandwich when he gets home from work.

If I do that I'm an idiot, if a guy does it he's 'progressive'.

Fuck feminism

Of course not.
Let most of them get single mom'ed or end up bitter lesbians with cats.
The practical ones will always set a proper price for the services they have to offer.

Not until September I think

>tfw will never suckle a dirty pig girls giant titties

Why live m8s

>married women tend to be more conservative
>liberals push for "single mother" culture to prevent this

No, it's all gone according to plan goy

all rights are a mistake

Better question why did this rise in popularity over the last couple of years? I swear to god prior to 2010 I've never heard the term cuckold, now it's flooding porn websites and trannies invade everything.

It's terrible for a multitude of reasons.
It's responsible for decreasing white birth rates, increased the number of children born out of wedlock, increased immigration, keep us perpetually stuck in a leftist government limbo which we cannot get out ourselves out of (as they vote predominately left/liberal), and taught them to be groid sympathizers/traitors to their own race. The cultural shift of recent decades + Women's liberation + the fact that the majority of women are malleable, short-sighted, and petulant dolts whose sole intent is self-gratification and garnering as much attention as they possibly can = huge fucking mistake. Women were made to be pliable to men - if males of their own race suddenly cannot provide them guidance, they'll seek it somewhere else.

The only one taken out of context is the rapist slide, unless you are inferring to pre-marital sex as rape; then again, it would be viewed as lost of property.

Yes
Anyone who say no need to leave Sup Forums forever and become a member of reddit and tumblr.

USA was a mistake, you should stay a colony fucking burgers.

The largest we ever let the jew convince us to make user.

Those are big tits for a chink

I'm actually perfectly fine with equality. Problem is most women nowadays don't want equality but unjust privileges.

once non-landowning males could vote. That was the downfall.

Non-landowning males have no stake in a country, they don't care about the future, since they can (((wander))). You can't rely on them in times of war since they won't defend their land. They'll vote based on fancy speeches, and gibmedats, and muh feelings.

Only land owners should be allowed to vote. If every nog and every illegal and every millenial starbucks barista couldn't vote because they didn't own land, this country would be a lot better off. Plus women wouldn't have won the right to vote since trashy non land owning proto-liberals wouldnt have voted in favor of it in congress.

Women had plenty of rights before the "women's rights" and the suffragettes. It's just that their role in society was different. This movement may have seemed pleasant and desirable at the time and the idea of getting rid of those rights is distateful but it was a big factor in getting us in the shit situation that we are in now and society (and women) would be much better off had women's liberation never happened.

Excellent.
I love me some big diddies

Nice enfranchisement there.
While i agree that voters should have responsibilities, they need to be given a stake in the future of the nation, and self-sufficiency.
So everybody should get land, and you cant own more land than anyone else.

They were already mobilized into household's workforce. But now you sent women to do men's work and men to do women's work. Good job, genius.

why the fuck should everyone get land?
Land is the most valuable thing you can own and its value never depreciates.That's like saying everyone should get free gold just for living in a country.

That's stupid, stupid "thinking" That's also fucking communism and redistribution of wealth (being land).

You're not smart.

>there are things more important than money

Like keeping women from working? I'd prefer the money.
Working is sucking money now?And what's the value of a person washing clothes and cooking? Because the average worker earns 70k

As far as I know we should vote again on 2 October, but I´m not sure tho.

>And what's the value of a person washing clothes and cooking?
Median salary in US is $26K, average is $44K and average live-in nanny cost is around $30K. Nice mobilization of workforce, goys.

degeneracy accompanies collapse

strawpoll.me/10728088

mostly yeah
commencing feminism dump

If you believe this we might as well just convert to Islam.

...

...

...

...

...

...

Who cares?

let's see more of those tits.

...

...

...

yes it was. it was the coup de grace on destroying the family unit.

Haha silly communist, taxes are never a mistake.


>ofc it was a mistake

If everyone gets land everyone has the means to make a living and have a stake in the nation.
This is what citizens should have