I'm not a feminist or anything, I'm just curious

I'm not a feminist or anything, I'm just curious.

Other urls found in this thread:

breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/02/sorry-girls-but-the-smartest-people-in-the-world-are-all-men/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Both are right.

The first one nullifies the second

One of them is correct

...

Both are attention whores playing the gender baiting game.

one is a journalist and one is a Kickstarter scammer

there is no difference. Sup Forums (and the alt-right) are reactions to the extreme regressive left. They brought in identity politics, called everyone racist, and eventually some people said "fuck it if your racist why cant I be"

two sides of the same coin

I still hold Sup Forums to a higher standard though because there is a definitely a contigent here that doesn't give a shit about either but wants to watch the world burn for the inevitible violent racial conflict between both of them

case in point: Dylann Roof and Micah Johnson

Okay, but how are their arguments different?

They're both shit, why does anyone act like Milo has anything intelligent to say?

He's basically Ow The Edge: The Person

inb4 "leftie btfo"

I'm voting for Trump.

One is open to debate the other is always behind her safes pace and white knights.

Lel

Rape isn't an inert state of being the way being stupid is

There both subversive (((Jews))) looking for free money, nothing either of then say is of ANY worth

Stupidity is not a criminal offence.

Seriously, I can't fucking stand Milo. He's like that one kid in class who wants to know everyone's IQ

Milo probably is less serious about it. He knows his fans are stupid and gullible. He's just playing them. Sarkeesian probably actually believes in her bullshit.

But generally they're not much different from each other, they have simple answers to bullshit that really doesn't matter. They, or their fans, are not aware of real politics and worldwide issues. They think everything can be solved by attacking "those SJWs" or "those misogynists". And this is pretty much how Sup Forums works as well.

pol loves the gay jew who cant stop talking about black dicks.

Yup, first one is right and explains why the second one is false.

One said most (and is right), the other said all (and is wrong).

But they're both sweeping negative statements with little to no evidence.

I'm not sure where he said that but he also has said there are more phenomenally stupid men than there are women because of how Iq is distributed.

One gets shut down by BLM

One spoke to the UN acccompanied by a porn actress and was taken seriously

Who actually listens to his speeches? Does he even prepare them anymore? I've tried like three in the last few months and every time it just results in people yelling and interrupting after he says something edgy. I think that's his entire act. At this point I wouldn't be surprised to find out that he's paying people to cause disturbances at some of his events to build up hype around himself because if people stop giving a shit, his public speaking career is over.

People like him because of his edgy meme status. There's just as many idiots in this community as there are in theirs, it's just our idiots aren't as malicious.

>false equivalence
Nice slide thread you got here. It would be a shame if someone saged and reported it.

>Milo probably is less serious about it. He knows his fans are stupid and gullible. He's just playing them. Sarkeesian probably actually believes in her bullshit.

I think it is the exact opposite and Sarkeesian has shown this by having a kickstarter for her shitty videos and making thousands of dollars off of them. I dont see Milo trying to scam his fans.

I'm pretty sure that one of these is about retaining the historical definition and the other two are about changing the definition for their own benefit

But you're from tumblr anyways

Also actually what Milo says is that "gay men are more intelligent than men and women".

>But evolutionary science, it seems, presents us with an even more compelling reason why gays should pipe down and get back in the closet. It’s all down to how smart gay men are, compared to the rest of the population.

>We’re told that behind every great man is a woman. It follows that a great man with another dude behind him would do even better. And so it has been for much of the life of our species. Historically, homosexuals have been massively over-represented not just in the arts but in all the various corridors of intellect, power and influence.

>The British Establishment, in particular, has long relied on gay geniuses. Consider Alan Turing, Oscar Wilde and John Maynard Keynes. OK, maybe not that last one.

>Elsewhere in the world, the story is the same. Abraham Lincoln was almost certainly at least bisexual. And then there are figures from remoter history, such as notorious bum bandit Alexander the Great. It seems that wherever you find human greatness, gays are joyfully abundant.

>That’s at least in part because gay men are smarter: we test higher for IQ than our heterosexual counterparts. Intelligence allows us to “transcend” our evolutionary programming, according to evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa, which may explain the correlation between homosexuality and high IQ.

this. Milo's nothing but an attention whoring trouble maker. all those alt right e-celebs who coopted gamergate for their personal gain are faggots

One is an opinion, other is a statement on something that has to happen and is a crime, without any basis.

If you consider anyone who is dumber than you stupid and he's probably a bit higher than the average person on IQ, with the way women's IQ Is distributed he would be right that "most of them are stupid".

If he say has an IQ of 115 then more than 50% would be "stupid" given my definition so that would be most.

>I'm not a feminist or anything, I'm just curious.


yes, and also mentally retarded

Milo is right.

Because it's observable fact that the majority of white girls are idiot normies wheras most men have not in fact "raped" a women unless your definition is so broad that even looking at a woman is rape

The first is true and the second is false.

Keynes was based though. NatSoc was Keynesian

>being stupid isn't a choice
>being a rapist is
Not all people are rapists but the majority of the world is stupid...

But Milo even admits that he believes in nothing he says. He said Trump is a joke and doesn't really want him to win. But he saw a good opportunity in gullible conspiracy theorists and alt-right manchildren so he went for it. He's not a scam in same way as Sarkeesian he just enjoys the attention and sells his merchandise while doing it. He's basically a performer.

One is right and one is wrong.

awww poor guy did OP hurt your feelings? :( This is not your safe space kid

The first statement is objectively correct in that it uses IQ statistics.

The other is an ad-hominem, and a lie, as there is no study available which objectively proves most/all men have at some point in their lives, raped a woman.

Keynes was also dead wrong about most things.

In economics he's basically like Freud. Most of his reasoning is bullshit upon further inspection and he's only really studied because he's important to the history of development of his field.

Most women are stupid and most men aren't rapists. Pretty basic really.

This. Men have a larger standard deviation, and are more creative and risk taking. This leads to (violent) idiots (hill billies and niggers), but also allows for geniuses, comedians, entrepreneurs, and inventors.

>muh historical definition
Found the Hillary supporter.

facts v feels

>Traditionally religious institution, granted government dignified legal structure to support the natural product of marriage, the proliferation of legitimate families, which are future tax payers

>LOVE IS LOVE FUCKERS, mutual masturbation deserves LEGAL authority to club those INTOLERANT religious people over the head to participate in glorifying sin, MUH FEELS

lol of course he thinks women are stupid. Hes a cocksucker. If you werent sexually attracted to women you would see how retarded they are too.

>most women are stupid
is that his actual quote?

not...
>most radical feminist are stupid
?

I.e. Hillary Clinton

Well put user

breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/02/sorry-girls-but-the-smartest-people-in-the-world-are-all-men/

This is what I was talking about.