Who would win on a neutral field, college style rules?

Who would win on a neutral field, college style rules?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8GKmkD1pUG0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Browns by 70

Browns.
Every time someone posts this, the Browns.

Bama
Kizer is a college QB

>a bunch of college kids vs a group of roided up negroids
hmmmmm

Unlike Hurts?

>a bunch of former mediocre college players vs the most dominant team in college football right now

hmmmm

jalen hurts would try that running shit and get blasted.

Hurts has a better line, defense, and receivers

>Better Line
>Better Defense

I don't know anything about college football. Are the alma maters of the current Browns roster any good?

Alabama would unironically win this year. The Browns probably have less guys that deserve to be in the NFL than Alabama does.

Alabama by 3

The professional team wins every time this comes up, in any sport. There is no accounting for size and strength differences between 18-22 year olds and grown men with access to NFL trainers, coaches and equipment even compared to a top flight college program.

Additionally it's just extraordinarily hard to make an NFL team. Even players on a team like the Browns are in the top percentile of former college players. Chances are most Alabama players won't even make an NFL roster.

Everything this user said. If you seriously think that a college team is a strong contender against an actual NFL team, you deserve to be purged.

>The professional team wins every time this comes up

Okay, but we're talking about Alabama vs the Browns.

All graduating Alabama players should just instantly be sent to the browns until they win 2 games in a season

Name one starter on alabama's roster that isn't going to make an NFL roster

you can't

...

...

>boys against grown men

really makes me think

Bama has some good college players but every person on the Browns roster was a good college player/at least good enough for the NFL.

Browns every time.

That said, if we were to match the Browns against a team of college all-stars, then the college team would have a far greater chance at winning.

>motivated, pumped up kids with a thirst for blood and something to prove, many of which are NFL ready
vs
>0-16 team called the 'browns'
My money would be on Alabama

Alabama would unironically lose 90-0 and their O-line would literally get steamrolled on every single play.

Posting Alabama should get you banned from here desu

>im gna bet on de kIDs

Could Alabama even get a punt off?

>literal teenagers vs a group of the strongest and fastest men on earth

The Browns are a dogshit organization, but it's still an NFL team. Half of Alabama's team would probably get injured. There's no getting around the size and speed difference in the nfl

i will never ever understand these threads

no one can honestly believe bama would stand a chance right?

It's a retarded shitposting thread but since it's "sports related" the mods won't delete it

Never underestimate southern rednecks devotion to college football

>This meme has been around forever
>Its always still the browns

Browns would be up 62-0 with 3 minutes left in the first half when bama would have to forfeit due to not having enough players to field a team anymore due to injuries. Most requiring hospitalization.

Browns. Stop making this fucking thread for the love of God

Bama

Bama?

Alabama arent even national champs yet kek. That honor belongs to UCF

If you assembled a roster from the worst player in the league at every position they would STILL push any college team’s shit in.

the brows already exist

Browns had a lead in the 2nd half of 3 games this year. Bama wouldn't lead any NFL team after just 1 quarter.

But it's the fucking Browns.

I mean, could they ever?
youtube.com/watch?v=8GKmkD1pUG0

>this question again

i would honestly love to see this game played just to see the browns not only win a game, but absolutely and completely crush an opponent in the most one-sided game in history

it would be a massacre

Neutral field means Bama fans would easily outnumber Browns fans, which might give them the edge.

They used to actually do it where college teams would play professional ones.

1. That wasn't a punt
2. "Getting a punt off" means could they even snap the ball and have time to punt it, which if he were referring to a field goal, was done in this video.

>Bama fans would easily outnumber Browns fans
I didn't know that Food Stamps could be used to buy football tickets

If you really think the Browns' problem is with the players and not with the coaching, management, and ownership, you are part of the problem.

The Browns can exist because the ownership can, year after year, convince the fanbase that "this year is the year in which we will draft the best QB in the league! this year is the year in which we draft the best in the league! this will be the season that we start winning big time! keep watching, goy!" Face it: the problems with the Browns are structural, not individual.

Fucking this. People act like the Browns get blown out in every game on a 70-0 margin or something. They score in most games they play, and a large number of games are still either 1 or 2 possession differences. At some point, we just need to stop responding to these idiots.

No they didn't. They would do a college all-star team vs the NFL/Superbowl champion from the 30's to 70's.

The NFL Champions were 31-9-2 vs college all-stars and the average score was not close. The difference between this and a team like Alabama is even during their best years, schools probably only had 2-3 players on the all-star team at most.

An actual complete college team would get destroyed by any NFL team, forget about the defending champion.

> "Bama has a legitimate chance of beating the Browns"

Georgia>Bama

Browns Scout team by however many points they wanted to score.

>This is what rednecks actually believe

they should have this game and then make the spread atlanta +30. imagine the fucking cash flowing in

This probably isn't true. The worst player in the league is some practice squad guy with 1 NFL game under his belt and is probably worse than quite a few college players

>The worst player in the league is some practice squad guy with 1 NFL game under his belt and is probably worse than quite a few college players
But still better than a vast majority of them.

A lot of good schools among their roster. Some historically good, some with recent success, so yes

But the Browns don't have real NFL players either. It's not shit posting if their own GM says it's true

my ex gf's retarded cousin said a Saban coached team could beat any NFL team

This

ummmm shouldn't you be asking if Georgia could beat the Browns??

Cleveland by about 40.

Can you imagine Alabama's quarterbacks against an NFL defense? It would be a massacre.

For any of yo autists actually thinking Bama could win:

>Approx odds of CFB player making NFL roster are about 2% or 1-in-50
>College rosters typically have around 100 players on them including redshirts
>For bigger programs like Bama this means about 5-7 players are NFL caliber from their current roster
>Let’s be generous and round this to 10
>Browns have a roster of 53 players good enough to get into NFL

Browns in an obliteration. Georgia and Bama could combine their teams and they wouldn’t win.

>size
Cleveland has 18 players over 300 lb, Alabama has 20. Cleveland has 9 players over 6'5, Alabama has 23.

She was fucking him and he was probably the product of incest

>Browns have a roster of 53 players good enough to get into NFL
Debatable

Alabama would have negative yardage by the end of such a game.

Tua is legit. They have a chance