Europe's ethnic anomalies triggers my autism

>Why are there Southern Slavs disconnected from other Slavs.

>Why is Romania so far away from other Latin languages

>Why does Hungary exist. It should be in Mongolia

1. Hungary
2. Hungary
3. 1 and 2

>Language maps are ethnic maps

It's true for the most part.

When another ethnicity adopts another language they usually forget thier ethnic origin and adopt thier language's ethnicity.

Irish are the exception

>Why does Hungary exist. It should be in Mongolia

Hungary is genetically South Slavic now

Sad, but true

If by South Slavs you mean Slovaks and Slovenes, then that's true.

Because to a large extent it's arbitrary, you silly gook.

Let's begin with the fact that Basques, Celts and Dutch speakers inFrance don't fucking exist. Or that the various linguistic groups of Switzerland don't feel any less Swiss. It's not like you go from one village to another and suddenly everyone stops/starts being Germanic or something.

Thirdly, Romanians are slavs. Just snowflake Slavs who wuz Romanz 'n shiet and copied a buttload of Italian and French when formalizing their language in the 19th century.

We are not slavs, we are gypsys you wh*Te cracka. Moldovans are the only slavs.

>t. user who's never been in Hungary
Maybe you would like to visit us sometime.
If anything, you could have associated us with gypsies, since that is what the media thinks about us.

>Thirdly, Romanians are slavs. Just snowflake Slavs who wuz Romanz 'n shiet and copied a buttload of Italian and French when formalizing their language in the 19th century.
That's wrong though, Romanian is in it's core a pure latin language, they just have a lot of slavic laon words, much like the English languge has a lot of latin loandwords, but that does not make English a romance language.

Jokes aside, literally this. One exception though, moldovan region is mucho slavic in my opinion, and represents something close to 35% of the population

Green pride world wide.

During later Roman empire fell Germans migrated into Balkan area, they got displaced by Huns and moved into Italy and Iberia, this pretty much left all of "western east Europe" pretty empty. So around 500AD to 800AD proto-slavs mass migrated from contemporary Belarus, Ukraine and west russia, into all of europe.
They even displaced Germanics in central Europe all the way up to Lubeck/river Trave.
To trigger more Slavs. Most of modern Poland was Germanic during the first millennium.
Why do Slavs breed so much?

Also Charlemagne/frenchies killed off whole non-christcuck Germanic ethnic groups.

>Romanian is in it's core a pure latin language
I know, but there were active latinization efforts in the 19th century. To complete the analogy to English, imagine if some retard decided to actually follow through with that retarded Aenglish shit.

...

t. davido-kun

It's not an ethnic map, it's a linguistic map, you retarded gook.

Wow the Japanese education system sucks. You don't get taught about Danic people?

>>Why are there Southern Slavs disconnected from other Slavs.

Save for Slovenes they are mostly Balkan natives who adopted the Slavic language in the latter half of the first millenium AD. Which makes them cultural Slavs but not ethnic Slavs.

>>Why is Romania so far away from other Latin languages

Again they are Balkan natives who adopted Latin back in the imperial days of Rome.

>>Why does Hungary exist. It should be in Mongolia

Again they are mostly natives (predominantly ethnic Slavs) who mixed with migrating Finno-Ugrics (the Magyars), the latter establishing itself as the ruling class and imposing its language and culture on the natives.

In that sense they can be compared to Turkey, who are mostly culturally Turkic but not ethnically. When the Turkics conquered the Greco-Anatolian and Kurdish natives of Asia Minor, the natives outnumbered the invaders 10 to 1, but still the Turkics managed to impose their language on them.

I hope all this makes some sense to you now.

You confuse me. Im not sure anymore that you are really pretending to be retarded.

1 Hungary
2 Hungary
3 Hungary

good meme

Breddy Gud :DDD :DD

>So around 500AD to 800AD proto-slavs mass migrated from contemporary Belarus, Ukraine and west russia, into all of europe.

Although this is true, it must be said that Venedics, aka proto-Slavs, already lived in Central Europe long before that. The Venedi were a settled people according to Tacitus, they intermarried with nomadic Sarmatians whose tributaries they likely were, and they also seem to have intermarried with Germanics.

The Vandals for example, although they are generally considered a Germanic tribe as they spoke a Germanic language and had Germanic names (at least their nobility did), culturally they differed markedly from the West- and North-Germanic tribes in the sense that they cremated their dead just like their eastern Venedic/proto-Slavic neighbours, a practice which was loathed and only reserved for criminals and general unwanted elements by the Germanics. They also seemed to have a pagan religion which differed and contains elements common with the Venedics to the east.

We have some idea of the genetic composition of the Vandals, because they were next to the Romans the only foreign tribe to settle on Sardinia (together with the Alans). So a research group (Francolucci et al. 2013) extrapolated from the genetic data of Sardinian population and found back the Vandals in the north and the Alans in the south. The Alans were mainly represented by R1a-Z2123, a subclade associated with Caucasian Iranics and mainly found there today in their descendants the Ossetians. And the Vandals were similarly found to mainly consist of equal amounts of R1b-U106, commonly associated with North-Germans, Flemings and Dutch, and R1a-M458, a subclade closely associated with West-Slavs and most common in Poland today.

Furthermore, the East-Germanic tribes absorbed a lot of Venedic elements, most notably the Goths who during their 4 centuries stay in what today is Poland and Ukraine, absorbed so much proto-Slavic and Scythian elements that today a remnant of Visigoths in Spain is not marked by I1, the haplogroup most common today in Gotland, but again by R1a West-Slavic subclade. You can find a representative peak in Cantabria, where indeed a lot of Goths settled during the invasion of the Moors in Spain.

>Also Charlemagne/frenchies killed off whole non-christcuck Germanic ethnic groups.

Naah you exagerrate, only the Saxons, and they weren't exactly decimated, just forced to convert. After that there was one uprising (Widukind) but Charlemagne suppressed it and only ordered 4000 rebels killed, a number which many historians think is exagerrated. Widukind himself fled to the Danes, but was even pardoned later because of his willful conversion to Christianity. For that reason the Saxons spoke highly of Charlemagne (even though they were now made part of Francia) and there were no more uprisings against the new religion.

And France didn't exist back then, Francia both contained Gaul and Magna Germania. Only after Charlemagnes death France and HRR Germany emerged from the 3 parts Francia was first split in (Charlemagne had 3 sons).