This piece of shit movie is being artificially pumped up by shills

This piece of shit movie is being artificially pumped up by shills

Do your thing and give it shitty reviews

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RPAklIlov-A
youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>IGN
>6.9/10

when IGN doesnt rate 10/10 it's LITERALLY shit

>77%
Pretty good
>59%
Mediocre
>69%
Just OK

Sounds about accurate actually. Have you seen it?

>falling for the jewditor reviews
wait until tomorrow for the first user reviews to come in
the shitstorm will be ebin
meanwhile lookup the "official" videogame on metacritic and steam

My local radio station was shilling this and said only women hating men hated it and were a minority.

They also interviewed the director and he said hollywood should do more reboots instead of make new concepts and concluded with a hint at soul sisters as a reboot of blue brothers.

Everybody knows you can't trust iternet scoring you dumbfucks, who gives a shit, just don't give your money to them retards

>40€ + 4€ DLC for a game that looks like a boring version of Magicka
>all reviewers refunded

I like how they don't show the IMDB score.

Honestly I don't even need to.

The best they can shill for it is to say
"eh"

As if even the shills have to admit it's a pretty piss-poor attempt at a film. They could get away with this with an action flick or a low budget horror but comedies need to soar in order to really do anything.

They only give Call of Duty 10/10 you shrill.

who fucking cares, it's a movie. why are you spending your energy getting mad at a movie and making a thread on Sup Forums about it

Did you watch it?

> give it shitty reviews

Look at the reviews it's getting for fucks sake. They're already trying to backpedal.

They tied themselves to this movie like it's a cultural watershed moment, even though female led movies have come and gone with success and nobody cared. We had major female leads in the 80s and 90s. The "battle" is already over except in the minds of these virtue signalling retards.

When the positive reviews spend more time talking gender wars than movie content you know it's a shillfest.
It's like a testing ground on whether you can sell a product on leftist ideology alone. There are "reviews" that encourage people to buy plastic toys to support the movie, not on merit, but ideology.

MGSV

How is "enjoyable, disposable fun" rare? It's the definition of a summer blockbuster.

Do these people even spend 5 minutes stringing words along?

Here is an example of a non-paid review on imdb

>I don't like this movie so no one else should either
What the fuck is wrong with you? I've already watched it by the way and while it wasn't the best movie ever, it was still pretty good.

>d-d-damage control
reminds me of Chris Evans "TopGear is doing fine" tweets

Worst adaptation of this cartoon ever!

Ewwww cooties: the thread

I'm certain you summerfags are giving this movie more attention than the people who actually like it.

>I le down voted it on the Internet xD le legion le forget. That will stop people from watching it xD

Kys

This movie out or not?

What are the sales like? Seems like no one is posting that info

It seems to be thought of as extremely mediocre.

Girls under 10 are excited about it, an action movie for their demographic. Which is a goal I can appreciate, in and of itself.

its edging up as reviews come in , soon it will be in the greatest movies of all time (all categories) section.

maybe Sup Forums was wrong?

But this one actually got a gorilla this time around

The movie failed because the creative energy was spent thinking about feminist issues instead of the script, the cast and the story.

Female leads dont make a movie automatically bad, its just you should focus on the movie instead of the fact that it has female leads.

I just watched Devil Wears Prada again a couple of days ago and its still a movie I can rewatch and enjoy despite it aimed at women. It's because it has a good cast, good story and good chemistry between the actors.

>Giving a fuck what critics think

They are literally people that are paid to shitpost

...

>disposable fun
>pumped up

Amy Pascal (studio exec) and Paul Feig (director) will rue the day they screwed over Ivan (origional director of first 2 movies) and destroyed this franchise to live out their hyperfeminization fantasy.

Also they give huge sums of money to Clinton, Clinton Foundation, and associated PACs the both of them. They had a political agenda and we don't want none of it.

youtube.com/watch?v=RPAklIlov-A

kek I was waiting for that!

>soul sisters
>blues brothers reboot

I haven't even SEEN blues brothers but already I feel disgusted. Honestly though without feminism you wouldn't really get the same drama in the news.

go look at "Spy"

female lead? great reviews automatically

I agree with you but I think i'd like to add who ever was in charge of visual effects needs to die in a fire.

A big part of (real) ghostbusters is the "feel" of a gritty, spooky b-horror movie from the same 70's/80's era. Practical effects, lighting, filters all contribute to that mood. This new movie has none of this, it's like a plastic wrapped cartoon parody of itself. Visually, this definately got the phantom menace CG treatment.

What kind of idiot gives a fuck about movie reviews?

>salon.com

It's almost funny.

>soul sisters

Just kill me now.
Plus, who the fuck are they gonna get to cameo?
Theres only like cee lo green and amy winehouse left in the soul genre, and one of them is dead.
Maybe they could get luther vandross in there but

The original had aretha for christs sake, man the remake is gonna suck

If they do this with movie reveiws, just imagine what kind of manufactured consent they create in the news with current events and politics.

...really makes you think.

>laffs

What is he, 12 years old?

Spy is actually funny. Only good movie that fat chick has been in.

see
and
They've made seeing this movie a political act by tying it in with virtue signaling. They made it political.

Salon
> virtue signaling cucks

I'm pretty sure most of these were forced by the studio, probably the same with the casting,

This is sad because even if the people who made the movie really wanted to make a good movie the script and everything major was decided by the studio, not them.

Don't watch it, don't talk about it. The movie will go away on its own. If it's artificially pumped up, the normies will watch it and still hate it.

Reviews dint make a bad movie into a good one.

youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8

\youtube.com/watch?v=OG83qBuQ_A8

why do they think the only type of people who hate the movie are basement dwellers?

>user reviews
>fair and honest
This movie has become a cultural/political crusade on both sides. Don't expect any reviews to actually be based on the movie's merits or lack thereof.

Well, the IMDB score has been vote bombed by people who haven't even seen the movie. Makes it easy to dismiss.

They don't. Or rather, facts are irrelevant. They can paint their enemy like basement dwellers and then act like people living in mom's basement are also high ranking nazis who are ready to take over the government.

It doesn't really make any sense. If it's just trolls and losers online, how do they have any power?

On the one hand they want to undermine people criticising by painting them as powerless non-people. But that doesn't work when they're trying to paint the stakes of the moral battle they pretend to be involved in. So they have to have both images simultaneously which makes no sense, but they're leftists so they're used to logically inconsistent viewpoints.

watch the video
It explains

This.

The movie is destined for the $5 DVD bin at Walmart by this time next year. Ignore it and it will go away.

Comes out on the 15th in the US. Hasn't stopped thousands of 1 votes from US "audiences" on IMDB.

thanks

The left dont spend money, you have nothing to worry about.