State’s Churches Must Ban Sermons on Sexual Identity; “Not A Bona Fide Religious Purpose”

This is what happens when you tolerate gays and trannies. they don't want to live and let live. They want control.

familypolicywv.com/new-law-requires-states-churches-censor-sermons-sexuality/

>State civil rights commission says churches must censor unwelcoming sermons, open childcare to trans workers. West Virginia’s homosexual activist alliance across the state including local human rights commissions, several city councils, state manufacturing associations, hotels, restaurants and corporations are secretly plotting to deploy Orwellian restrictions on church sermons and childcare operations in every county in our state. Violate the censorship and suffer penalties.

>The article below details this free speech-killing assault on religious liberty that our attorneys are already fighting against on another front. Wheeling is the next West Virginia stop on the “trans” activism train. Leftists are colluding with Ohio County elected officials to push this type of censorship and tyranny onto faithful Christians and others who dare dissent. Officials in Wheeling have been secretly planning to steal privacy and safety from its women and children like several other cities have done. These activists across the country and here in the Mountain State will not be satisfied with suing Christian businesses. Now churches must also comply.

Other urls found in this thread:

lifesitenews.com/news/iowa-church-sues-to-preserve-free-speech-on-transgender-issues
youtube.com/watch?v=VkjpaxBlKIU
icrc.iowa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/2012/SOGIPublicAccom.pdf
realhealthcarerespectslife.com/summary-of-known-health-risks-of-abortion/
priestsforlife.org/speakersmanual/ch4theologicalcasebible.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Holy fuck Western Christianity is KEKED

What happened to separation of church and state?

It isn't convenient.

>What happened to separation of church and state?

Only applies when it goes their way

and so it begins.. Fellow red necks getcher asses in here. Now granted, i dont think this shit will fly once it is exposed and fought even a small amount, seperation of church and state can actually be useful here, but what Im wantin to know is the names of these officials.

Interesting, but could we possibly get a less biased source? Surely if it's a new law there's reporting on it in the regular news somewhere, or at least an official report from the government body that enacted it. I'm not seeing anything skimming through that article.

Based. Get em son.

>Tfw The Jacobins are making a come back in the 21st century

This is happening in Iowa, too.

lifesitenews.com/news/iowa-church-sues-to-preserve-free-speech-on-transgender-issues

youtube.com/watch?v=VkjpaxBlKIU
We have a coalition to defeat them again, lads.

This should only really affect protestants so who cares. The sermons at Catholic or Orthodox parishes are concerned with the liturgical readings of the Gospel.

I want the Ten Commandments on the state capitol then. I want Crosses on every government workers uniform.

icrc.iowa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/2012/SOGIPublicAccom.pdf

Here's the official state document.

wtf?! I blame gay men for this.

If your church's homily doesn't touch upon social issues, you're going to the wrong church.

If your Church touches more on social issues than how to be a follower of Christ and understand the true faith of the Gospel, you are going to the wrong Church.

Nobody is talking about a law being passed or enacted, the blog talks about a "homosexual activists alliance", comprised almost if not entirely of private organizations and none of whom are named by name, which is "plotting" to do this. The blog then asks for a donation so their church can fight it. Its literally nothing, no legislation is being proposed and nobody whose opinion actually matters is involved. This is closer to welfare fraud then a news story.

Why do you assume the two are mutually exclusive?

Church should be about God and His word, not some pastors pet social issue.

>the Bible has no relevance to society

Do you really believe that?

Jesus talked a lot about greed, and money lending, and loving your neighbor, He never said a word about homosexuals.

See also
I'd also make the claim that the Bible's stance on abortion is less than clear.

This. Tyoical protestant faggotry.

Tell me more about these faggots and stuff..

>DOES THIS LAW APPLY TO CHURCHES?

>Sometimes. Iowa law provides that these protections do not apply to religious institutions with respect to any religion-based qualifications when such qualifications are related to a bona fide religious purpose.Where
qualifications are not related to a bona fide religious purpose, churches are still subject to the law’s provisions. (e.g. a child care facility operated at a church or a church service open to the public).

HOLY SHIT IT'S REAL.

>Not bombing every single church that accepts this and runs with it
>Not castrating the pastors and feed their burning carcasses to the wolves
>Not impaling the government employees that see it fit this happens
>Not rolling trannies off cliffs
>Not shoving dynamite up fags asses
>Not twisting lesbo's inside out with industrial presses

It's like you fags aren't even redpilled, since when did Sup Forums become so cucked?

WACO 2.0

>both homosexuality and abortion have been pretty much universally condemned by Christianity for 2000 years, but let's pretend we know better now.

We need the IRA's expertise on bombing first.

Abortion was not even much of an issue until very recently. Read a fucking book.

>Abortion was not even much of an issue until very recently.

Because it was condemned universally until the feminists made it into a "right".

Ironically, the banning of infanticide was considered a moral landmark of western civilization and religion.

The 20th century thought putting the genie back into the bottle was "freedom"

>people have been infering things from scripture that Jesus never said for years and that makes it the word of God
Not buying it

No, its just that in the last 50 or 60 years medical science got to the point where abortions actually became safer than having a baby.

That's what the media and the (((activists))) want you to believe.

realhealthcarerespectslife.com/summary-of-known-health-risks-of-abortion/

priestsforlife.org/speakersmanual/ch4theologicalcasebible.htm