Gender & Clothing

Why does /pol oppose men wearing women clothing? (Most) clothes are identified with one gender or the other only as a consequence of tradition (Of course there are exceptions; e.g. brassiere).

High heels and skirts were used by men for example. Women didn't wear trousers until very recently too.

I, personally, wouldn't use women's clothing (They look way too uncomfortable), but i can't see any logical reason to criticize men that would like to.

I would be more than glad to change my mind if somebody presents a reasonable argument.

Pedro, look at the man in the picture. The Sun King is a faggot by today's standards. And rightfully so.

I swear to god, we need the wall now more than ever.

>One of the most powerful men ever was a faggot just because a burger said so.
I said logical arguments, amerifat. Appeal to emotion is idiotic

And good luck with getting the resources to build that wall bt-w.

>high heels
>skirt
>panty hose
i do believe you posted a cross-dressing faggot user

You do realize it wasn't cross-dressing in his time, right?
Again, no argument from you besides name calling. I expected too much from /pol it seems.

>men didn't wear boots
>men didn't wear pants
keep telling yourself that

>Never said that.
>Never said that.
I don't tell myself anything but you do.

...

We have the resources--we're going to mortar the walls with the pulverized bones of your 30,000,000+ countrymen here illegally.

>'Murica

>"we're going to mortar the walls with the pulverized bones of your 30,000,000+ countrymen here illegally"
Such an edgy teen.

man the i love 17th century clothing

Changing standards of dress != dress dysphoria

The men in these pics were not wearing women's clothing by contemporary standards.

>all men wearing pants and waistcoats
>none of them in 3 inch high heels
>wearing knee-high stockings instead of tights

meanwhile, here's your fuccoi in another skirt and high heels picture

The point is why should people maintain contemporary standards that have only tradition and no logic behind?

So stockings and "short" high heels are o.k.?
What is the difference, burger?

heeled shoes are just stylish, but high-heeled shoes are for women

stockings cover as much as they need to. panty hose are designed for skirts to prevent chaffing of women's thighs

your boi was a cross-dressing homo

>1.Fashionably elegant and sophisticated.
Subjective. I do wear Oxford shoes though.

>"High-heeled shoes are for women."
Where does a heeled shoe becomes a high-heeled shoe? Great circular logic bt-w.

>"panty hose are designed for skirts to prevent chaffing of women's thighs"
O.K.

>"your boi was a cross-dressing homo"
Still not giving any logical argument. You are just saying: "it is because it is" and "it is because i like it that way".

It's almost as if fashion changes over time.

Women wear high heeled shoes to extend their posterior and look more attractive to men.

That's why it would be odd for men to wear high heels.