How long until she gets picked up by Fox News?

How long until she gets picked up by Fox News?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jgNvzc-ZdME
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderation
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

more like how long until she gives in and does porn

what did she do to get banned?

I like that there's a Canadian version of her also named Lauren.

Said shes pro-choice

It's funny because these right wing retards bitch about liberals needing safe spaces but the second one of their own hints she doesn't agree 100% with everything they say, the republicucks snap and demand a safe space

She is controlled opposition.

pretty face but an intellectual lightweight people proclaim is a representative for the right to bring on their shows and beat down.

They're not asking for a safe space, they're firing her because it's a political website and she's opposed to one of its main principles. Imagine if one of those Salon/Slate people wrote an article about how we need to deport illegal immigrants, they'd be fired immediately.

imagine forming a seal around her nose with your mouth and having her blow out all of her snot

its just glenn beck though, hes an autist

Why does she yell when she speaks?

That's what she gets for trying to have thoughts of her own.

>the blaze

L E L

Because that's how you know you're right.

Look at her, she's had at least one abortion. How are they so dumb this wasn't obvious immediately.

The problem comes from the fact that she didn't write a piece about it, nor did she do a video segment on it. She made an offhand comment that lasted less than 15-30 seconds on a random talkshow that wasn't hers. She didn't say it on the blaze website at all.

You're conflating "alt right" types with republicans.

I think this might be true. She's unbelievably stupid and it seems like nobody on the right respects her, but she keeps getting called to talk on left-wing shows as some kind of representative of the right.

It's the exact opposite of that left-wing guy who used to go on Fox News and say deliberately stupid things so Hannity could yell at a strawman for 30 minutes.

>doesn't agree
Its not just a point of contention. Pro-choice means 'I support murdering babbys'
I wouldn't want to have retards who it's okay working for my company too

Would love to see this girl get BLACKED tbhfam

post her tits

I want to kiss her feet

They're really the same at this point, plus or minus jesus.

she's a gross ugly whore and really annoying. idk why anyone likes her

Sup Forums calls anyone from their ideology acting in a negative way controlled opposition

Trump would've been controlled opposition had he lost

>Pro-choice means "I support murdering babbys"
Conservatives, everyone.

Glenn beck, her boss, called her out on being pro choice when previously she was staunch pro life.

He then pointed out how she has changed views to fit what ever narrative she is trying to push.

Are you retarded? She's a public figure, she doesn't have to just voice her differing opinion on her employer's website for them to drop her. And besides it just shows that she's a useful idiot and controlled opposition like some other user already stated.

She might actually be controlled opposition, though. All she does is go on left-wing shows and shout.

...

Pro-choice means the right to make an abortion.
Abortion means terminating human life
Therefore, Pro-choice means the legal right to terminate human life

Sort of reminds me of a thing, I think we called it slavery

>I wouldn't want to have retards who it's okay working for my company too
>retards

Were they the ones who taught you English?

And? That's literally what it means Captain Obvious(ly retarded)

hahahaha no

republicans and democrats are basically the same

So she had an abortion some time this year, meaning she probably got knocked up at a new year's party. Who was the father, Sup Forums?

>#wrekt

>l-life begins at conception you guys!!!
kek

Trevor Noah, obviously. BBC conquers all

>le I'm to smart and have transcended mere politics babby

She's a complete fraud so she would fit right in.

youtube.com/watch?v=jgNvzc-ZdME

>le both parties are the same meme
Nah.

Where it begins then, smartass?

>controlled opposition

Or she's just a retard like PJW

>mfw the Right always eats itself

>imblying it doesn't

I'll make an exception in that I do agree that you're mum should have had an abortion

Not at conception, I'll tell you that.

>15-year-olds debating politics
smells like reddit in here

Standing up for women's rights

>every right wing retard who shows how retarded the right wing is is "controlled opposition"
Maybe you should reflect on how your ideology is fundamentally retarded instead of having to comfort yourself with the idea that everyone who exposes how retarded it is to the masses is involved in some sort of conspiracy.

>I'm to smart

Good job with that verbal lambasting

>reddit: the post

>le truth is in le middle
>South Park told me that everyone is stupid except me
>radical centrism is a valid political ideology
You are the worst kind of person

>a blob of cells that has no brain or heart should have the same rights as a fully formed human
kek

...

This is why I always tell lefties and righties to fuck off. They both have their extreme nut case ends that like to get their claws into the parties when the parties themselves get in.

Middleground is so much more sensible. There are good ideas on both sides. Bad ideas on both sides. And there's some stuff from the third parties that should be looked at, or dismissed, as practical and logical.

I really get sick of people taking either side, or any side. People need to do what's good for them, not political or corporate groups that have their own interests (and often screw over the little people to get ahead). Unless you're rich, and guiding these parties or corporations, you have no business supporting them. Government and Business is always by the government and for the government, and by the business and for the business. Never by the people. Never for the people.

Only idiots buy into shit like that.

>can't into obvious irony

Stick to 9gag kid.

They are equally stubborn opposite ends of the spectrum. There is no room to pass any meaningful legislation when neither side will bend. How stupid are you?

Is everything you don't like controlled opposition to you paranoid Sup Forumstards?

Blame Sup Forums. They brought them here with their dank memes.

When they can actually live outside of the woman's body would be my guess.

>they are equally stubborn
Hahahahahaha, no.

>wanting your country filled up with brown people, future criminals and all around children of single mother scum

>Standing up for women's rights

>Killing Fetuses at the stage where they're all women

>*carelessly uses the wrong word*
>"I did it on purpose, homo."

Sure.

The way the Republicans have completely torpedoed their own candidate's legislative agenda for ideological reasons makes me think that one party might be a little more stubborn than another. At least the Democrats managed to push through bastardized versions of Obama's policies.

>Hahahahahaha, no.

Good counterpoint.

>developing person shouldn't have rights as a person

We're all blobs of cells genius.

So it's okay to abort babies 5 minutes before birth?
What about prematurely born people? Is it okay to kill them because they're not 'real people'?

how do you know she had an abortion

Well said, get into some politics or something

Where do we draw the line, though? At what point do we look at that clump of cells and say "ok, it's wrong to kill that?".

how ironic coming from a commie

I know the whole BBC thing is a meme, but after she went on Trevor Noah's show a few months back they went to dinner together afterwards.

>democrats have hearings for Gorsuch
>republicans outright refused to even consider Garland
>TH-THEY'RE THE SAME YOU GUYS!

Brain and heart forms within the first few weeks.

>commie
Behold the idiot conservative, attempting to communicate displeasure after having had his idiocy thoroughly exposed.

I had to write an essay on abortion
I'll boil it down in case anyone thinks they are actually smart in having pro-life viewpoints

>a fetus has the right to life
>a woman has a right to her bodily autonomy
>for abortion to be morally wrong, a fetus' right to life must impose welfare rights on the woman that trump her right to bodily autonomy
>if that is the case, then a homeless person's right to life must be the same
>therefore homeless people have the right to steal whatever they need to survive
>this is not the case
>therefore the right to life does not entail welfare rights on the woman that super-cede her bodily autonomy

Debate me someone

>newfag doesn't recognize to smart

Stay normie.

So you're okay with an abortion in those first few weeks, then, and you would agree that if sufficient non-functionality can be demonstrated in those organs, the limit should be moved even further out. Thanks for playinh

so the ambition for the right wing media is to be just as good as salon/slate? amazing

you sure exposed me

>People are gonna get guns anyway, there's no point to gun control laws!
>Whaddya mean women are gonna get abortions anyway? NO, WE CAN LEGISLATE THEM AWAY!
Conservative logic.

ITT more proof that the Alt-right are the new SJW's. Just put them all on an island together so normal people can live in peace

>Socialism
>Good idea

>caring about female bodily autonomy

lol

nice strawman

Discredited your own argument right in the second line. Why does the woman have the right to bodily autonomy but the baby doesn't? Who made you god to draw the distinction?

>m-muh clump of cells non-argument!

>all developed countries have socialized healthcare except the US
>all those countries spend way less on healthcare per capita than the US
>SOCIALISM IS LE EVIL IN ALL CASES NO EXCEPTIONS YOU GUYS!
Conservative logic.

What's funny is that she used to call liberals baby killers because they're pro-choice. Suddenly, she's pro-choice. I can only assume she, or someone close to her, recently had an abortion or something to explain this change in tune.

the fetus does have the right to bodily autonomy
the woman's body is not the fetus' body
pretty simple bud

So you've given two examples.

That must make your argument right.

There has been historic partisanship for going on two decades now. Don't be obtuse. If the House and Senate aren't majority same party as the President, then nothing gets done. There is no more compromise.

She already is a contributor.

>american education
Got that PhD in gender queer faggotry studies yet?

She's gonna be a star
Pretty white female
young
huge online presence

putting her on fox would dilute her brand but if she created her own conservative brand similar to TYT she'd be set

It's okay when republicans do it

>get disproven with an extremely relevant example
>N-NO THEY'RE STILL BOTH THE SAME
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderation

...

I've been here for like 5 years. You fucked up, guy. Never convincing me otherwise. Deal with it.

Explain where the woman's right to murder it comes from then.

I'm not American and gender studies isn't a real subject
Why would ethics imply gender-studies?
And why are you attempting to attack me instead of my argument? Is it because you can't?