>USA has "muh human rights violations"
>Russia has "muh Russian minority"
What does your country use as its go to excuse for military action against a country?
>USA has "muh human rights violations"
>Russia has "muh Russian minority"
What does your country use as its go to excuse for military action against a country?
>Muh fishing vessels
usually the threat of getting kicked out of nato
But we didn't do anything
Americans ordered us to
muh international peacekeeping
Oppressed Muslims.
Of course we didn't
They've only used it once here though. Not a rule.
Exactly, why are you repeating what I just said?
>only once
Forgot about that Ossetian minority already?
Qt
Forgot the OP already?
We don't. It's just no one ever invaded us after all the shenanigans in the 19th century were over.
Even though FARC shenanigans in the 90's.
They are a minority in Russia, hence a" Russian minority".
4U, lol. You can't even say it in Russian.
Intentional ambiguity is one of the Perfidious Anglo's greatest advantages.
It's called lack of education. Profits any power.
>implying
I think it is a common knowledge.
Muh "must preserve alliance with America that seems to be entirely one-sided even though our major trade partner is china"
>muh america dragged me into it because im too beta to say no
Pretty much covers everything except Iraq, the one time we balled up
>what is Vietnam?
We were still supplying shit to the US like ammo and napalm. I guess it wasn't combat direct but we were still contributing war assets against another country
>What does your country use as its go to excuse for military action against a country?
"muh ausschwitz"
>muh queen said so
So was Spain, Japan, Iran, Brazil, the list goes on
So do you think a treaty with China would be better and not one sided?
Previously
>where Britain goes, we go
Now
>we'll go, but i-it's not because we like you or anything, baka Americans