Atheism is the death of Society

This is not an argument about the epistemology or the metaphysics of god's existence or lack thereof. This is an argument about the usefulness of religion. Religion provided many things to society when implemented correctly. The truth is that most people are sheep and weak willed. Myself and most here included. We need something to give us purpose and keep our actions in check.
Religion did this:
>gives people a reason to strive and contribute even when their lives are shitty (i.e. afterlife)
>prevents and punishes degeneracy
>creates strong in-group bonds that gives strangers reasons to care about the others well-being
>keeps female hypergamy in check. Maintains the family. Promotes marriage
>Has an ever-present big-brother(god) that prevents many people from committing immoral actions.

Many of you will counter that nationalism is a secular substitution, but it is not.
Even Hitler needed his neo-pagan religion to keep people in check.
Even the Jews would collapse as a force without their religion to keep them in check. This is why even "atheist" jews still identify as jewish and participate in jewish customs and rituals. It's a way of maintaining community and cohession

Other urls found in this thread:

jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1386689?sid=21106321008783&uid=3739936&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256
uonews.uoregon.edu/archive/news-release/2012/6/belief-hell-according-international-data-associated-reduced-crime),
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge
youtube.com/watch?v=EYX2pmXe14U
youtube.com/watch?v=vqQdc0mX1_c
youtube.com/watch?v=I-rD4gD3Oe4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Sure religion has helped instill the idea of community and groupthink.
But now we've got FREEDOM to independent thought and objective morals and ideas of justice and how to treat fellow humans so we don't need your religion bullcrap.

bump

18+ only in here

*tips copy of Beyond Good and Evil*

> objective morals
Do you know what objective is. Religious morals are by nature objective because they derive from god. Atheist morals are for the most part subjective. Unless you are a Kantian which most atheists are not.
>FREEDOM to independent thought
Get's all opinions from Hitchens,Dawkins, and (((Harris)))

Kantian=autistic so yes in a way atheists are Kantian

Why do you think Kantianism is autistic. Other than the fact that the categorical imperative is very spergy.

Modern technology is ultimately what killed faith

The simplicity of farm life and pre industrial life is tied to strong morals and religion and really the Internet and Computer was the death of the soul.

Amish are totally right. Its more than mere ritual, the masses need to have their very lifestyle be simple and narrow.

You mean (((Hitchens)))

Those are some valid points OP. It's unfortunate that they are counteracted by the extreme brutality brought about in the name of religion, including millions of tortures and deaths, dismissal of scientific knowledge and indoctrination of young minds with nightmarish depictions of hell which continue to this day

You said it, the categorical imperative. The first time I read of it, I just knew Kant was autistic. How else can you argue against nuance or particular situations?

Hitchen's actually was pretty anti-Israel and named the kike (Kissinger). Harris is full blown jew-cuck.

Replace religion with nationalism.

Hitler tried and failed that

>Modern technology is ultimately what killed faith

Then why in modern times did Russia experience a mass conversion to Christianity? According to jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1386689?sid=21106321008783&uid=3739936&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256 for example, just in 1994 in Russia "a third of the Russian people who once said they do not believe in God now do believe in God".

Modern technology doesn't seem to have much of an effect. Russia has become Christian, China’s development coincided with a rise in atheism, and development and spread of information in the Middle East didn’t coincide with any change in the fact the region is unanimously Islamic.

There’s barely correlation here so we don’t even have the illusion of a basis to say there’s causation.

>Has an ever-present big-brother(god) that prevents many people from committing immoral actions.

Explain pic related

>by the extreme brutality brought about in the name of religion, including millions of tortures and deaths
2 of the largest genocides in history (Mao and Stalin) were conducted by atheists. Atheists have killed tons of people. Atheists torture as well. Islam and certain sects of Christianity actually forbid torture.
> dismissal of scientific knowledge
big bang theory: catholic
algebra: muslim
general relativity: jew
etc, etc, etc
philosophy until 1900: muslims, christians, hindus,buddhists
>indoctrination of young minds
lol. Because atheist hollywood isn't fucking up young minds. Right.

So fooling the public with lies is the best way to run society?

I once thought like you but then I realized:

Science and technological progress really was a mistake. The Industrial Revolution was the end of the west.

It came at the cost of destroying the fabric of society. And really it's just magic. Your computer screen is the exact kind of thing the Bible called witchcraft or scrying. And forbade for clear philosophocal reasons. Whether or not it's supernatural doesnt matter.

Technology is man trying to play God and find cheat codes instead of following the rules of the game. Worhsip of mechanical idols (the internet)

There's no compatibility between sound morals and modern technology. Ted Kaczynski understood this and went mad.

I really see no way around this terrifying conclusion.

Did you even read my entire post. I addressed that point specifically.

Keeping them busy is most important.

Which is why technology directly led to feminism and pretty much every other leftist movement

Fringe groups, by definition, are at one extreme or the other

>russia and middle-east
Technology hasn't really spread through these societies like the west. Yet, I can vouch having been to the middle east that the increase in technology is causing a decrease in religious adherence and rise in degeneracy.

Russia still has lower standards of living.

Faith comes from struggle

OP is 100% correct. religion is not an end in and of itself, but a tool to use for the benefit of the nation. this is what makes the tragedy of the current cuck pope so bad.

>objective morals
lmao

I agreed up until you mentioned Hitler's "neo-pagan religion." He was publicly Catholic until the day he died. He and other Nazi leaders even made fun of Himmler's occultist obsessions in private.

However he was definitely an atheist. He, or saw the benefits of religion and continued to practice christianity.

Also most of those muslims are black. People forget that black muslims are one of the largest groups of muslims in America.

>Hitler
>neo-pagan

In what imaginary universe do you live?

I dismiss your subjective opinion off-handedly

>So fooling the public with lies is the best way to run society?
Yes. Most people are shit at critical thinking and being rational.

That's it. I'm am now a muslim
Praise ALLAH الله أكبر

How does pointing out that Atheists have killed people do anything to prove what I said wrong. Atheists don't kill in the name of their religion, which is what we are talking about here. And if you the influence of Hollywood has had a detrimental effect on the minds of young people than religion then you must be daft.

>including millions of tortures and deaths

Yeah its not like atheistic Communist movements tortured and killed millions and millions more people in the past century than Christianity ever has

> dismissal of scientific knowledge

"they disagree with me so they deny science itself"

Just like they dismissed the historical sciences that pointed so firmly to Communism right? Or how they foolishly held that Belshazzar was a real person despite Daniel obviously being wrong? (Sure archeology later definitively proved that he existed and was exactly like the book of Daniel portrayed him, but that's beside the point guys!!!!!)

>indoctrination of young minds with nightmarish depictions of hell

How sad that they tell people about the permanent consequences of evil. Sure belief in Hell creates moral behavior (uonews.uoregon.edu/archive/news-release/2012/6/belief-hell-according-international-data-associated-reduced-crime), but its wrong of them to warn kids about consequences!

Pope Pius XI issued an encyclical against his neopaganism, so it's far from a meme

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge

>The encyclical condemned breaches of the 1933 Reichskonkordat agreement signed between the German Reich and the Holy See.[4] It condemned "pantheistic confusion", "neopaganism", "the so-called myth of race and blood", and the idolizing of the State. It contained a vigorous defense of the Old Testament out of belief that it prepared the way for the New.[5] The encyclical states that race is a fundamental value of the human community which is necessary and honorable but condemns the exaltation of race, or the people, or the state, above their standard value to an idolatrous level.[6]

Agree with OP, here's a pic I like

The way i see it the Internet must be destroyed or made inaccessible to the majority if we are ever to return to traditional society.

Sup Forums is a perfect example of how too much information even if true is demoralizing.

Most people should be simple in their lives and knowledge and social circles. Really even mass literacy was a mistake

people also forget that most of your black "muslims" are NOI niggers. the rest of the muslim world considers NOI to be either not muslim at all or a bunch of weirdo heretics.

How much cinnamon toast crunch did you eat today?

But for what purpose? What is the goal of society?

Even if you're right and atheism will destroy society, who are you to say whether that's good or bad? Maybe if knowing the truth leads to the death society, then society deserves to die.

Traditional Catholicism or Orthodoxy

>He was publicly Catholic until the day he died.
I agree, but he wasn't a traditional catholic. Regardless my point still stands. Religious observance was a very important part of the nazi ideology.

Again another reason thw Internet must be banned.

Atheism is directly correlated by internet access. As much as Sup Forums doesnt like this we would all be better in a less connectwd world where close community is more important.

But what does any of that have to do with akira

...

False. I'm religious and morality is subjective.

>Did you even read my entire post. I addressed that point specifically.

You falsely claimed that Hitler needed paganism to have people believe in nationalism.

Fact is most Germans at the time were Christians and most of the organizations of Nazi Germany were highly religious by today's standards.

Their is no need for fairies and sky daddies to have people believe in nationalism or racial superiority.

It's not atheism; it's a lack of duty. You can attribute the shortfall in our societies to atheism because of the pure justice that comes from a belief in Christianity. Not enough time between the two points did not allow for a secular notion of duty.

So no matter what you believe it won't change the truth right? We're on the same page here correct?

What you believe is about how your brain is written... also right?

The atheist-theist debate is based on slight changes in the way the opposing brains are written like... correct?
Both brain's programs share enough overlaps to oppose another, a contact point is persent right?

The contact point also has a particular structure... doesn't it?

>How does pointing out that Atheists have killed people do anything to prove what I said wrong.
It doesn't it just shows that getting rid of religion wouldn't solve the problem.

>Atheists don't kill in the name of their religion, which is what we are talking about here.
They do. Mao specifically killed christians and Buddhists because they weren't atheist and adhered to their god over his communist ideology.

>And if you the influence of Hollywood has had a detrimental effect on the minds of young people than religion then you must be daft.
It has. Religion doesn't have young girls turning into sluts. Religion doesn't have young men turning into thugs and degenerates. Religion doesn't raise the divorce rate.

I would argue that atheism is not the death of society. Rather, ones viewpoint on free will is the death to society. People who thing they do not have free will of their life, will likely do things that are not morally just thus leading themselves down a road of determinism or worse- fatalism.

One can be atheist and still believe that they have free will over their own life and actions.

>he was a pagan because he was racist

Nice try Christfag

>Fact is most Germans at the time were Christians and most of the organizations of Nazi Germany were highly religious by today's standards.

>Their is no need for fairies and sky daddies to have people believe in nationalism or racial superiority.

wot the fuck

>Religious observance was a very important part of the nazi ideology.

lmao are you serious?
real talk: neither hitler nor the rest of the NSDAP gave a fuck about christianity. they sometimes paid lip service to it when it was politically convenient, because most of the population was still christian (though not very pious) but that's all there is to it. overall they rather disliked christianity for glorifying weakness and failure, but they didn't act out on this dislike because they couldn't afford the loss in public support that would have entailed.

I see the lack of simple clear cut roles that people had in pre industrial society as inherently tied to lack of religion.

They both go together and are inseperable. You really cannot have pervasive tech that makes life this easy and too sociallly mobile and also still have religion and a sense of duty.


People tend to ignore that technology defines culture.

>>'80986193
Damn you guys are dumb. These atheists you are talking about don't kill people because they are Atheist do they? No, they have other motivations and justifications for their killings, unlike people like Vlad the Impaler who murdered and tortured thousands of people in the name of Christianity. I'm not sure how you're trying to deny that they dismiss scientific knowledge when they used to kill people if they didn't believe the earth was flat and continue to dismiss evolution in large parts of America, I could go on and on. The fact that you believe teaching kids that they will burn in Hell for eternity is a good thing says a lot really.

This is also true.

KEK FUCKING CONFIRMS IT, FAGGOTS.

>low-effort bait/not reading the link

>Even if you're right and atheism will destroy society, who are you to say whether that's good or bad? Maybe if knowing the truth leads to the death society, then society deserves to die.
This is the kind of nihilism atheism creates. Truth has no inherent value. Truth is only valuable because it provides something.

Atheists don't kill because the rule of law is still in place

Give it a few years

This is why i reject Darwinism including racial eugenics.

It's just more fatalistic modernist trash

The contact point.

youtube.com/watch?v=EYX2pmXe14U

It doesn't. I just needed a pic.

There is no God but kek. Christfags should be purged

What fucking religion are you.

...

Sky Tengri.

Then please use proper nouns.

...

Can you stop

Independant thought with no moral backing always ends in the worst in humans. It leads to vanity, insecurities, excess, lying, cheating, stealing, rape and murder. When you answer to no higher authority then you will never be the best you can be as a man, or woman. You have got to understand morals.

We received Obama because the nation wanted everything besides religion. Now look at us... if the nation still wants your type of thinking then the nation will factually end. Freedom is never free, if not blood by war then chaos.

But you didn't answer the question. What is the goal or purpose of society that is so important you have to brainwash the masses with lies to make sure it doesn't fall apart?

Look at Sup Forums.

Internet anonymity is the ultimate example of degeneracy. It prevents social shaming and reallt shouldnt be allowed in a righteous society.

Sup Forums promotes anti authority views. It is by nature bad for you

Christ fags are killing the west. Retards get pushed away from right wing politics because they use the bible to justify their stances and now you have this mass perception that everyone right wing is a religious nut.

youtube.com/watch?v=vqQdc0mX1_c

youtube.com/watch?v=I-rD4gD3Oe4

Was posting molymeme who agrees with OP part of your tanned german plan?

...

The West has been dead since the Industrial Revolution

Christian. Finally the gays can be put to death, and we can have good honest wholesome nations.

>Sup Forums promotes anti authority views.

The authority now is amoral and degenerate

then why are you here

It is but falling for the ''I'm a rebel'' culture of this place means that you will stop truly being moral if it ever becomes the norm. Sup Forums cares more for being different than actuallt being consistent in principles.

If you're not OK with Sup Forums being banned in your ideal society you're just an amoral contrarian rebel akin to 60s hippies just in reverse

atheists are usually more educated, so they like to say

When was the last time you went to Church OP.
Practise what you preach first.

Many hippies grew up and became neocons.

Same will happen to unprincipled Sup Forumsacks. They'll probably go back to being progresives after two terms of Trump just ro be against the norm

>Religion is good! Religion is great!
>Looks at Islam.
>YeahNope.jpg

Religion may come from god, but ultimately a human is the middleman. Ultimately it is corrupted. Ultimately it is made perverse and distorted for the sake of a ruling hierarchy that claims to hear the word of God.

I will have faith in God when God shows himself to me unequivocally, no sooner and no later than that.

I'm a Christian mate. I have only one set of morals regardless of who is currently in charge now

Gotta agree with you OP. Also the slippery slope is real, first you are not saying grace and the next thing you know you are a omnifaggotos non binoculary fish mouthed degenerate having your dog eat peanut butter out your ass while Jamal fucks your wife in the other room
Aka
Canada

Islam was made by jews

So was Christianity.

"From God's lips to my ears, from my lips to your fears."

Athiest here.

The main problem aethiests have is that they stupidly equate morality solely to religion, then proceed to rationalize that if one does not need religion they do not need morality and ethics.

In other words they use it as an excuse to be lazy, which offends the shit out of me.

You included.
Have fun working in a coalmine for twelve hours a day because the "Volk" needs you. I'll be sitting here, enjoying my free society. All of you edgy cuntlords think that National socialism and religion are so good because they suppress the people, but you forget that you are part of "the people". Yes, degenerates are annoying and all, but it is a small price to pay in Exchange for your personal liberties.
Get fucking real. Go outside and witness all the shit that you are allowed to do in the West. If after that you still long for a dictator telling you what to do and how to do it, move to best Korea and see how that works our for you...
Goddamn edgy faglords

...

You are a fucking retarded cuck. First off Vlad the Impaler did not kill muslims for christianity, he wasen't doing crusades. He was killing them because he was a nationalist patriot and they were invading Romania. But I guess you english cucks wouldn't know anything about defending your borders from invaders would you? Also your other things were wrong. And for your last bit, are you saying you should tell a kid that if they kill, rape, and steal they go into heaven? Are you that retarded?

I was beaten to it. Oh well, have this nice image instead. I'd say we're at around the third step.

Yeah. And now even the smartest atheists now will look back and say that a christian society is more efficient.

You have no say over our religion