Reminder that corporations lose billions of dollars whenever there is even the smallest change in legislature regarding emissions or pollution.
There's 10 anti-environmentalism shill threads up at all times on Sup Forums because it's in the best interest of corporations to do so. They're paying a few people to spam this shit all day and ruin our board because they want to implant ideas in you.
The idea is this is more offensive than anything that gets posted on Sup Forums.
Fuck the shills, fuck the Sup Forumsincels, and fuck the anti-environmental spammers.
Sage the threads, spam them with trash, down with the corporate shills.
I'm down with the gist of the message, but this kid's over-dramatized, clearly coached, bullshit act for clicks and views is fucking lulz.
Am I a shill?
Adam Miller
Also, the arguments against her adopted platform aren't that the earth isn't warming- as your link clearly proves.
It's arguments about the severity of the problem and what the solution should be. Proponents of the Green New Deal want to rip up existing economies from the root and do untold damage to the peons working in those and related industries. Surely there's a better way forward?
Pretending like the opposition's argument is just "hurrr climate change fake news climate isn't warming" is doing a disservice to discourse.
Logan Collins
There isnt a single profiting business involved this time. Those children are right and just want a life on a healthy planet. Business and governments are fighting them anyway they can
16 year old moron. You just wish she was 12 so she would be the age of girls you only have a chance with. You're on Sup Forums so I'm guessing she's smarter than your 8th grade education.
Benjamin Murphy
Dude. There's like 5 of us here. The rest are russian bots, shills and trumptards.
There's no real people here, just move on. Why is this site even up anymore?
Sorry. I believe in climate change but this kid is a fucking dork. Angrily admonishing people? Fuck off you stupid cunt.
Dominic Cook
It's the best the left can do, bra. It's fucking hilarious and pathetic... and I fucking agree shit needs to be done about climate change. CRINGE ALL AROUND
There is definitely a better way forward. To reverse climate change without destroying economies. It's called Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and it would be effective and cheap. And I'm going to spam every fucking Greta or climate change thread until we actually start talking about this as a legit option. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_aerosol_injection >inb4 Already happening faggot! Drrr chemtrails!!
>speaking English about climate change 95% chance you're talking to people who are part of the preventative measures rather than the problem China is a problem That place in the Netherlands dumping toxic waste is a problem Coal-burning in Poland is a problem
Look, OP: anyone can mount a soapbox like a beaten redheaded stepdaughter, and start waxing about how awful we are to Mother Earth (or Father, I ain't gender specific, or Zazzer or whatever the FUCK) And in fact, I'd say most people have toyed with environmental activism at some point in their life given the state of the world as it is That doesn't make them aware of the problems, though-- and the problems are fucking everywhere, and most certainly not all the product of people who ride mobility scooters in Wal-Mart (tragic though their lot may be). This apple-cheeked youngin' running around like she's full on a modern philosopher or some avant garde activist is cute and a good image, but it distracts from the real problems, which are everywhere and anything. You can google big environmental no-nos and find so many in so many places, big, small, inconvenient, lethal, you name it and you'll find the full gamut.
What are laymen supposed to do? Throw down everything we're doing and fucking march behind you like some sort of personal army? You gonna pay for my mother-in-law's chemotherapy and medications (the many, many medications)? No? Then I suggest you take your self-righteous crusade somewhere the fuck else because I'm just trying to do something simple to make good enough money that my mother-in-law's health is not a privilege but a right she is readily afforded. The cruel irony is I might not make it.
But I bet you dollars to donuts that Greta Thunberg doesn't give a single fuck. I'm just returning the gesture, hoss.
Landon Lee
we are at the verge of economic collapse, povery and hunger.. we have 100 problems in Argentina and being responsable for climate change is not one of them..fuck off Greta
Adam Richardson
Just a friendly reminder that this retarded little girl has autism and is being abused on The Daily by her antifa, soros-funded, anti-American, anti Trump, anti West, Pro globalist parents.
You literally just said "Think for yourself" and then "Let someone else think for you." Science is not ruled by consensus. Linking a government website that tells you what to believe because "muh consensus" shows how fucking gone you are.
Do you even realize that you have two fundamentally inconsistent ideas rattling around in your head?
Isaiah Anderson
>t. Retard It links to the most credible scientific organizations, and a ton of them. The fact that you disagree with science and only foxnews agreeing with you doesn't make every source trash, idiot.
>disagree with science I don't. I just don't, by default, agree with political opinions on science. I read papers and make up my own mind.
>foxnews Believing any news media on this issue, regardless of their affiliation, would be retarded.
>your pic related No reasonable scientist is going to agree that science should be decided by consensus. Only politicians and the media function that way-- because that's what they are dependent on. Politicians need votes, and the media needs viewers.
I worked in climate modeling for two years, and I didn't hear a single person say anything to the effect of 'the consensus is...' or 'the definitive opinion on the climate is...'. It was all highly specialized individuals, gathering data, and trying to understand a small part of it. When you got into the administration, it got political. They had an agenda, and they had an opinion they were trying to prove. Probably because their funding depended on it. butt even the administration rarely made any sort of public statement. It was generally the media that pulled from abstracts, made their own (often incorrect) conclusions and spread it to the masses.
>TL;DR: Climate science is done by generally good people, specializing in their field. Climate science is propagated by bad actors who twist good work to their political purposes.
