How is this true?

How is this true?

Attached: QuickMemo+_2019-10-19-11-38-05.png (469x320, 52K)

Well, you see, the homos get really turned on by uncut dicks. They can't help but suck them, bite them, shove them in their butts. So the less uncut dicks there are, the less bloody buttsecks there is.

It isn't, its a myth people believe becase the foreskin grows bacteria or some other noise, yet hiv is a virus

harder for things to break through the calloused head.

It isn't a myth. It's based on the retention of disease/virus causing cells underneath the foreskin which increases infection rate.

This is true actually. The foreskin is kind of the local headquarters for CD4 dendritic cells, which are the specific immune cells HIV takes advantage of to enter the body or leave to another body. Dumb but true, it's still not worth circumsizing every male in the world.

you know what else reduces the risk by the same amount, washing your dick after sticking it in that skank

Because no one wants to fuck those mutilated pricks.

It's also a statement based on a very small study of men from Uganda with very different sexual habits than the average white American man. The whole damn practice is a fabrication that needed evidence to support the continuation of the practice.

Got a source on that?