Attached: 332223.jpg (172 KB, 960x720)
Other urls found in this thread:
I keep it
Fuck these kids
Tell child A to give something in return to child B for the flute. Fuck C
A should buy it from B if she wants it.
C is a nigger, can't make anything, doesn't know what to do with it, but would be perfectly willing to take it and smash it to pieces then keep asking for more.
D: Child B should shove the flute up Child A's pussy while Child C fucks her in the ass?
the answer is always D, All of the Above
B, If I truly wanted I could make an argument for A. But who here would even consider C? And why?
I refuse to choose because the question assumes the third child was fully capable of making and playing a flute and just chose to be poor instead. A society is only as good as it's weakest.
Sure sounds like Child A should teach Child B how to play the flute in exchange for making her another one while C fist fucks her from behind.
Break the flute into 3 pieces
B fucking made it. Who is anyone else to argue over her belongings
Truth is, B actually received considerable assistance making the flute, like a free public flute carving education, subsidies like electrical and transportation infrastructure provided by the community, labor from C's parents kept cheap by captured regulators, and prior art and inspiration by A and her peers.
I get the feeling that Child B is supposed to represent the rich who don't want to be taxed, and Child C is supposed to be the working poor.
But that can't be right because the rich didn't make anything, they sat their asses on a sofa and collected dividend checks from a stock portfolio made up of companies that they have never heard of because someone else manages their money.
Also, if you gave money to the poor they would be able to use it.
This conservative think tank propaganda corporation didn't think their picture through very well.
Not saying I'd necessary give it to C in this example but I can explain to why it's a valid thing to think about ... In this example, the kids are obviously representative of the working class, the rich and powerful "job creators" and the lower class. In real life it's lot as cut and dried as this though, and they're trying to equate something like giving a flute to someone who can't or won't use it to giving money, jobs, services to the poor.
There are, believe it or not, people in this world who are poor because they're disabled, or have a mental condition, discrimination in the workplace causing them trouble getting well paying jobs, etc. , And it's worth at least considering helping those people via government services, welfare, etc. Because a lot of people on assistance actually DON'T want to be on it and ARE trying to dig themselves out of whatever hole they're currently in. Asking for and receiving help is stigmatized in our culture as this sign of weakness or being a lesser person because you couldn't do it on your own.
From a completely realistic view; musical instruments are stupid fucking expensive and of you gave one to a poor kid, it'd be a huge help to them when normally they wouldn't be able to take band class because their parents couldn't afford to rent one for 50 dollars a month.
Thanks for the perfect example of a generated false narrative. This is the kind of shit BLM and Occupy, and Extinction cult people dish out constantly. It is pure literal bullshit propaganda generated out of thin air just to try to destabilize the system.
Take the flute. All three children learn a lesson about sharing.
Which is the false narrative?
Her claim of "I made it myself?"
Or user's claim that she had help?
I'd say there is a good argument to cull the chronically weak and sick instead of, you know, literally subsidising not only their continued subsistance, but also subsidising their capacity to reproduce, thereby multiplying the problem each generation.
Hard decisions are best made early. I get it, most people are too pussy, I get it, right? Most people are dependent, I get it right? There's a limit and it's coming, whether anyone likes it or not, it's just nature, a cancer grows so far naturally before its lack of proper vascularization kills both itself and its host.
You should ask yourself who this world is for. Is it for some bacterial colony to take over and destroy? No, it's for the best. Who is the best? Well, someone sure as fuck is, and you may or may not live to see that glorious day, but it's there in the future shining like a beacon in the night.
Instruments in band class in the publicly funded schools are fucking free you twat. Unless of course you have to have a brand new one, in which case I guess C is outta luck. OH NO UNFAIR!
Get a job.
Take the flute
Take the flute, sell A into sex slavery, make B work in a flute factory 16 hours a day for pennies, and harvest C for HGH so you can live forever.
B, i made dis,
A, Gimme dat fo free
C, Gimme dat fo free
you can sell the flute to A, or lend it in return to payment/cooperation as A can use it the best although she doesnt represent the flute existance/origins, C is useless if you dont know the background of its capabillities, you can only make vague predictions, that will bear no fruit if its loose based, based on fantasy. C cant use the flute as it is. C just demands it as his, wont utilise it good, doesnt represent it, C is a parasite, a potential black hole of investments.
Free education for all.
Basic sustenance and shelter away from major population centers for deadbeats, sadbrains, the lazy, homeless, etc. mandatory birth control implants for ALL. When you prove you can 100% financially support a child, you get to have one.
You can live out your life in the free barracks with free food and free internet/ TV if you don't want to work, fine, but you don't get to reproduce, and nothing that is issued can be converted to cash.
Boom society vastly improved in like a generation.
Hey now C just needs more money for dem programs. C is also a valuable repository of votes!
Who the fuck gets rich from dividends?
People with a lot of money which is bad mmmkay.
I take the flute for myself because I'm the governing body and a socialist.
literally B's property, the fuck even is this?
I break the flute into three pieces and distribute it equally amongst the children.
A test to see if children have been indoctrinated enough to believe supporting societal dead weight/ redistribution of wealth is good and just.
Child C fucks who in the ass, child A or child B?
The entire world eventually.
Lol B should lease the flute to A for 90% of profits and 15% of any record deals forever. If A manages to build a Neighborhood, B should pay to move C into A's neighborhood to bust the block and make a huge profit.
B should settle somewhere noone wants them behind a giant wall. B should then flood A's home with C's, and claim that walls are bad.
A presumably already has a flute since they learned somewhere. Just give it to C so he'll shut up and give B the materials to make another. The new one will be better assuming B isn't a retard and knows how to improve.
Bonus: If C gets a flute, he can learn and also be an annoying pretentious flute playing shit just like A, then they can be friends or something.
B owns the flute. If you think A or C should have it, you are a fucking moron.
I would create a public education and health system. Standards for basic living. Flute manufacturing and playing knowledge for all of the children with be available.
Their parents will be given opportunity to work in flute or mines. Railways and highways will be constructed to improve logistics and infrastructure.
I will give their families free radios to listen to flute broadcasting. We will become flute masters.
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for flute children.
Kek, flute ore